 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Oceanography / May 2006Active undersea volcanos
Active volcanos on land are pretty well known. But what about those undersea? Are most known? And are known ones somehow regularly monitored? Alexmcw > Active volcanos on land are pretty well known. But what about those > undersea? Are most known? And are known ones somehow regularly monitored? If they supply tremors of 4 and more magnitude they will be posted on the NEIC site (or if they are in US waters 2+ Mag.) Thee is no real way to investigate deep sea vents by any other means. Most coast are pretty well known since bathymetry began about 100 years ago and grew to be intensely important for military purposesin the third world war. Compare the change of importance in military skills emphasised since Russia collapsed and that bloody fool Bush started WW IV. >> Active volcanos on land are pretty well known. But what about those >> undersea? Are most known? And are known ones somehow regularly [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Compare the change of importance in military skills emphasised since > Russia collapsed and that bloody fool Bush started WW IV. I suppose that heat released into the oceans by underwater volcanic activity is not too significant for climate.. (It is my impression that WW IV, as you put it, was initiated by 9/11 and other events having nothing to do with President Bush. I hope you are not one of those loonies who always seem to get everything sdrawkcab.) > I suppose that heat released into the oceans by underwater volcanic activity > is not too significant for climate.. Suppose that it is the heat that causes volcanicity and we might get somewhere. All the strange incomprehensible theories about blocks of earth mounting each other in sexually orgiastic fantasies is soooo ridiculous as to be worthy of some sort of of "foolish ideas of the millenium's" "highest achiever" award. > (It is my impression that WW IV, as you put it, was initiated by 9/11 and > other events having nothing to do with President Bush. I hope you are not > one of those loonies who always seem to get everything sdrawkcab.) The way that chimpanzee's minder's have used every dirty political trick in the book and the way it is all coming down on them like sh.t in sackloads is the funniest and the most tragic show on earth. Bush's minders have taken the once greatest power on the planet and turned it into a "third world country" dictatorship. And the leader of my country has colluded with those despots, to toruture and to kidnap. To miss out on discussing it at every opportunity, is to deny yourself that opportunity to take your name off the list of the good men who sat back and said nothing while the earth suffered. But tell me, how did the work of a bunch of disparate criminals on September the 11th, explain the invasion of Iraq? And even if it had had some as yet unexplained connection. How would the debacle going on now have sorted out any of the events of 2001? The USA started the century with most of the informed world despising their support of the evil regime in Palastine and now the work of the POTUS seems to have radicalised all the remaining neutral Arab statesmen into one united party of opposition to the insane and the criminal. Don't start calling other people backwards or ill informed until you know which end is up. You have to be concious for that. >> I suppose that heat released into the oceans by underwater volcanic >> activity [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Don't start calling other people backwards or ill informed until you > know which end is up. You have to be concious for that. It is a sad fact that the Islamic world, once a GREAT civiliization, has produced NOTHING of value to mankind for the past several hundred years. Now the more radical elements of it are engaged in blowing up people (using, for the most part, western technology to do so). All the ranting and convoluted analysis ain't going to change such facts. Yes, Bush and others have stirred up things, but someday will be praised as those who helped initiate changes which in the long run will help bring the Islamic world out of its intellectual stagnation. > It is a sad fact that the Islamic world, once a GREAT civiliization, has > produced NOTHING of value to mankind for the past several hundred years. Not counting the oil, I take it? If being a great manufacturing nation means that you have to build fences to keep people out? I thought that building walls and fences was the gift to the world of repressive regimes. If it is a measure of greatness, then the Muslims seem to have got it right. How many Muslim nations take people off the open sea and incarcerate them in Gulag Islands for Training in Moral Outrages where they can not get medical attention and where the worst and most brutal of that nation's soldiery learn how to hate and target them as future enemies? Like father like son. And all it takes is for decent men to say nothing. >> It is a sad fact that the Islamic world, once a GREAT civiliization, has >> produced NOTHING of value to mankind for the past several hundred years. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Like father like son. And all it takes is for decent men to say nothing. Yes, not counting the oil. And also not counting duststorms, sand and earthquakes. Also, the fence logic is not logic at all - it is merely a kid-like play on words. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.