Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Oceanography / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

about pollution

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Task - 07 Jun 2006 08:01 GMT
If an oil tanker leaks almost all oil out an ocean, how far leaked oil
spreads out and how much does it cost to recover as the ocean was
before?
Please tell me the answers.
William Asher - 08 Jun 2006 00:26 GMT
> If an oil tanker leaks almost all oil out an ocean, how far leaked oil
> spreads out and how much does it cost to recover as the ocean was
> before?
> Please tell me the answers.

Assuming the tanker is very small, carrying at most 1 gram of oil, the oil
might spread out to cover a few square meters and might take a thousand
dollars or so to clean up, but that cost is difficult to predict since it's
a strong function of where the spill occurs.  If the tanker sinks in a
bathtub, the cleanup costs are relatively small.  If it sinks somewhere
where a clean-up crew has significant travel costs to get to, such as a the
seas of Arcturus IV, then it could run into the trillions of trillions of
dollars, assuming a hyperdrive could be invented at all.  

As you can see this is a very difficult question to answer and if my
information makes it into your science report, do not quote me.

Signature

Bill Asher

Weatherlawyer - 28 Jun 2006 15:40 GMT
> If an oil tanker leaks almost all oil out an ocean, how far leaked oil
> spreads out and how much does it cost to recover as the ocean was
> before?

A lot depends on hpow the recovery is financed.

If it were to be the oil company or the ship owners to do the paying it
would be left to nature to sort it. But these days governments are
involved and so the money is not a problem. The ones doing the cleaning
usually co-operate with others in the trade and make the insurance
companies bleed.

The work almost invariably never starts until the weather turns nasty.

When BA wants to build an airport or runway, they get government
backing, so the more they spend, the more they make. If they can build
an airport for 3 billion or 1 billion they will make more money
spending 3 billion. The government then puts in 3 more billion.

Then instead of charging the airline companies 10 pence per passenger
to use it, they can charge 60 pence per passenger. Who is going to
quibble over 50 pence? I doubt 1 person in 20 is even aware of the fix.

I dare say it's the same in the oil-spill industry.

It certainly is with "rebuilding" Iraq. This sort of thing goes on from
Washington to Peking. That was how Russia functioned under the
gangsters when they were called the KGB and that is how it is run
today.

In Britain you were born into an aristocracy in which this sort of
behaviour was expected. Only a fool would suppose it changed in the
last few decades.

If rafts of straw were floated over an oil slick it would be mopped up
very easily at minimal cost. No one has ever done such a silly thing.
Julian Flood - 05 Jul 2006 08:45 GMT
> > If an oil tanker leaks almost all oil out an ocean, how far leaked oil
> > spreads out and how much does it cost to recover as the ocean was
> > before?

> If rafts of straw were floated over an oil slick it would be mopped up
> very easily at minimal cost. No one has ever done such a silly thing.

I started writing a spoof global warming page on my website and looked
into oil spills. I can easily imagine that a thin oil sheen right
across the water surface would have odd climatological effects.
Apparently (ie I read it on the web so it must be
right) .25 percent of total oil production ends up as spill, although
only a minute amount of that is as tanker spill: most comes from
drains.

Benjamin Franklin described pouring a teaspoon of oil, around 2 ml,
onto a pond and it covered the whole thing -- maybe an acre --  which
is not surprising when you realise it spreads to one molecule
thickness.

Assuming that only ten percent of oil spill is thin enough to spread
(probably a gross underestimate because of the drain business above)
it is trivially easy to work out what percentage of the ocean surface
is polluted at any one time.

Are there any anomalies showing up in the satellite calculation of
wave heights? I would think that the smoothing effect of the oil
should be noticable in the averaging that must go on to calculate sea
levels. Is the ocean smoother than it used to be?

JF
www.floodsclimbers.co.uk and look for global warming.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.