Climate change kills marine life
|
|
Thread rating:  |
simple_language@yahoo.com - 17 Feb 2007 15:50 GMT source: http://tinyurl.com/2wnjtv February 18, 2007
Unprecedented changes to ocean currents are having a devastating effect on finely balanced marine ecosystems, scientists meeting in the US have warned.
Off the west coast of the United States, the disruption has led to the death of huge numbers of sea animals including crabs, salmon and tens of thousands of birds.
Similar ecosystem upheaval has been recorded in other parts of the world, particularly South America and Africa.
Early evidence suggests that global warming is driving the changes by throwing previously predictable seasonal winds out of kilter.
The effects appear to be consistent with what has been predicted by climate change models, say scientists.
Experts at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Francisco described two extraordinary linked events in 2005 and 2006.
The first occurred when a nutrient-rich ocean current that normally appears off northern California and Oregon in spring was delayed by a month.
This led to a loss of phytoplankton, the microscopic plant organisms that form the vital base of the ocean ecosystem and upon which larger animals depend for food.
Salmon, which normally take to the sea at this time, starved. The effects rippled up through the food web as predators, including many sea birds, went hungry and died.
The following year the west coast current came back with a vengeance, producing an upwelling of nutrient-rich water twice as strong as the average recorded for several previous years.
Phytoplankton bloomed to levels not seen before, turning the sea to green-brown soup. They then died and sank, causing oxygen levels in the water to plummet virtually to zero.
The result was a "dead zone" in which nothing could survive. Scientists conducting a submarine survey found dead crabs and marine worms scattered across the ocean floor, and no sign of any fish.
The knock-on effects were once again disastrous for sea birds which relied on the sea creatures for food. Huge numbers of dead birds were washed up on the shores.
The 2006 dead zone, which remained for nearly 17 weeks, was three times bigger than any seen in the region before, said Dr Francis Chan, from Oregon State University in Corvallis.
He said: "It grew to an area the size of the state of Ohio and lasted much longer than we thought would be possible, from something that we tracked day to day to months on end.
"It went from a low oxygen system to a no oxygen system. This had a dramatic effect on marine life."
Dr Julia Parrish, from the University of Washington in Seattle, said there were "many spikes" in sea bird mortality during 2005 and 2006.
"Beaches were literally littered with the bodies of dead sea birds," she told the meeting. "Tens of thousands of additional birds were washing up on the shore."
Many of the starving birds had also been unable to breed, she said.
Seasonal winds blowing across the sea affect ocean currents by pushing away surface water, which is then replaced by colder water from below.
Warmer land temperatures resulted in higher pressures and stronger winds, which in turn had an impact on currents, said the scientists.
Normally these effects were predictable, but recently the system had become unstable and volatile - a pattern that mirrored climate change models.
Professor Jane Lubchenco, from Oregon State University, said: "Wild fluctuations in the intensity of ocean upwellings are wreaking havoc with the ecosystems of the west coast.
"We're seeing extreme distortions on both sides of the norm. This is a system that is out of kilter. It's fluctuating rapidly."
Up to five decades of data had shown that the events were "unprecedented in this ecosystem", she said.
She pointed out that similar ocean current disruption had been seen in other regions of the world, particularly Peru, Chile and parts of Africa.
"The ultimate causes of the changes are unknown," Professor Lubchenco added. "We finger the winds as the important culprit, but we do not know definitively why these winds are changing. We do know that the changes are what would be expected under climate change scenarios, and climate change is a viable hypothesis... We should expect more surprises."
Findings related to the 2005 event were reported in the online version of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Anthony Matonak - 17 Feb 2007 17:12 GMT > source: http://tinyurl.com/2wnjtv ...
> Up to five decades of data had shown that the events were > "unprecedented in this ecosystem", she said. ...
> "The ultimate causes of the changes are unknown," Professor Lubchenco > added. Hmm, 50 years of data out of the billions of years the plant has been around. It doesn't sound like a long enough period to be able to make reliable predictions. Then again, they flatly admit they don't know what is the cause.
Anthony
Ejo - 17 Feb 2007 17:39 GMT On Feb 17, 6:12 pm, Anthony Matonak <anthony...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote:
> simple_langu...@yahoo.com wrote: > > source:http://tinyurl.com/2wnjtv [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Anthony The provided link is not providing a reference to scientific literature, instead we are dealing with the interpretation of one or more journalists. This discussion and its conclusions are therefore difficult to understand.
Ejo
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 03:49 GMT > On Feb 17, 6:12 pm, Anthony Matonak > <anthony...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > Ejo Agreed. I have little faith in journalists and their supposed ability to judge scientific facts iwhtout spinning and blowing things out of proportion.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Joe Fischer - 17 Feb 2007 18:56 GMT >> source: http://tinyurl.com/2wnjtv >> Up to five decades of data had shown that the events were [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >don't know what is the cause. >Anthony Yes, those pesky winds, you just can't depend on them blowing the same direction on every day of the year, and what else could possible spell doom besides global warming.
Joe Fischer
kT - 17 Feb 2007 19:25 GMT >>> source: http://tinyurl.com/2wnjtv >>> Up to five decades of data had shown that the events were [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > blowing the same direction on every day of the year, and > what else could possible spell doom besides global warming. Yes, energy has nothing to do with winds.
Prevailing winds are a myth, a mass hallucination.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Eeyore - 17 Feb 2007 19:32 GMT > > Yes, those pesky winds, you just can't depend on them > > blowing the same direction on every day of the year, and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Prevailing winds are a myth, a mass hallucination. Just how big an idiot are you ?
Graham
lkgeo1 - 17 Feb 2007 21:12 GMT On Feb 17, 2:32?pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Just how big an idiot are you ? > > Graham ALMOST AS BIG AS YOU. HOWEVER, THERE WILL "NEVER" BE ONE AS BIG AS YOU . NEVER !
Eeyore - 17 Feb 2007 22:33 GMT > > Just how big an idiot are you ? > > > > Graham > > ALMOST AS BIG AS YOU. HOWEVER, THERE WILL "NEVER" BE ONE AS BIG AS YOU . NEVER > ! Awww. Poor baby.
I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a hydrogen economy.
Graham
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 03:49 GMT > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Just how big > > an idiot are you ? > > Graham [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Graham Not true, there will be, at least when we stary mining the gas gigants. Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 06:52 GMT > > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Just how big > > > an idiot are you ? > > Graham [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Not true, there will be, at least when we stary mining the gas gigants. > Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy. Sorry to disappoint you but there's not going to be any interstellar mining.
Graham
kT - 18 Feb 2007 07:03 GMT >>> I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a hydrogen >>> economy. We've already got one. It's a star called the sun.
>> Not true, there will be, at least when we stary mining the gas gigants. Totally crackpot.
>> Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy. Mildly cranky.
> Sorry to disappoint you but there's not going to be any interstellar mining. No, but interplanetary mining is inevitable. Simple regolith scooping for spacecraft shielding will do. We've already brought back rocks from the moon. We want to solve the problems you claim don't exist, and since they appear to be intractable now, our only recourse is to embark on an ambitious program of scientific research and technology development, and thus space is the obvious answer, there being so much of it and all.
You need to get out on the ocean every once and a while.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 07:16 GMT > >>> I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a hydrogen > >>> economy. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Totally crackpot. That wasn't me.
> >> Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy. > > Mildly cranky. Can you learnt to trim headers properly please so thjat they correctly attribute who said what ?
> > Sorry to disappoint you but there's not going to be any interstellar mining. > > No, but interplanetary mining is inevitable It's never going to happen. Anyone with the tiniest grasp of science and how to apply it can see that.
Graham
kT - 18 Feb 2007 07:26 GMT >>>>> I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a hydrogen >>>>> economy. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > That wasn't me. I don't know who you are and I don't care.
>>>> Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy.
>> Mildly cranky. > > Can you learnt to trim headers properly please so thjat they correctly attribute > who said what ? I'm commenting on what was said, not who said it.
>>> Sorry to disappoint you but there's not going to be any interstellar mining.
>> No, but interplanetary mining is inevitable > > It's never going to happen. Anyone with the tiniest grasp of science and how to > apply it can see that. Never is an aweful long time. Didn't mommy tell you to never say never.
Clearly interplanetary mining has already occurred. Viking already mined some soil and dumped it into the laboratory, where it was then analyzed.
We've already returned rocks from the moon, and captured interstellar dust grains. What is it exactly that you find wrong with demonstration?
With an estimated 9 billion souls on this planet in the not too distant future, something has got to happen. Clearly space is the objective.
Or do you plan on just living out your years in your clapboard condo.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 08:21 GMT > > >>> I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a > > >>> hydrogen economy. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > That wasn't me. Don't mind Elifirtz, he's just the local equivalent of the village idiot.
> > >> Or more likely, that will be a He3 economy. > > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Graham The only thing that can stop humanity spreading across space is a supernova or a gamma flash in close proximity to us.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 08:42 GMT > > > >>> I suppose you just can't bear to think there won't ever be a > > > >>> hydrogen economy. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > The only thing that can stop humanity spreading across space is a > supernova or a gamma flash in close proximity to us. Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look like a walk in the park.
Those who talk of factories on the moon make me laugh. I doubt they know very much about factories on Earth to be honest.
Graham
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 12:24 GMT > Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look > like a walk in the park. > > Those who talk of factories on the moon make me laugh. I doubt they know very > much about factories on Earth to be honest. In 1901, one of the Wrigt brothers said the following:
"Not in a thousand years will man every fly!".
He was wrong.
So will you be. Barring cosmic mishaps, humanity WILL conquer the solar system, and then the stars int time.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 13:53 GMT > > Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look > > like a walk in the park. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > So will you be. Barring cosmic mishaps, humanity WILL conquer the solar > system, and then the stars int time. There is not remotely any comparison betwen your A and B.
Graham
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 23:32 GMT > > Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: > "Peter B. P." > > wrote: > > Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Graham Whatever. History will prove me right.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 18 Feb 2007 15:39 GMT >> Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look >> like a walk in the park. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > So will you be. Barring cosmic mishaps, humanity WILL conquer the solar > system, and then the stars int time. It's all about conquest, isn't it.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 15:55 GMT > >> Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look > >> like a walk in the park. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > It's all about conquest, isn't it. It's the American way.
Graham
kT - 18 Feb 2007 16:00 GMT >>>> Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look >>>> like a walk in the park. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > It's the American way. And that's why the world hates you.
You pass off fascism as libertarianism. What a crock of sh.t.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Eeyore - 18 Feb 2007 19:12 GMT > >>>> Or the energy and materials needed ! It makes dealing with global warming look > >>>> like a walk in the park. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > And that's why the world hates you. I'm not American.
> You pass off fascism as libertarianism. What a crock of sh.t. Haven't you ever heard of sarcasm ?
Graham
Peter B. P. - 18 Feb 2007 23:32 GMT > Eeyore wrote: > > kT wrote: > >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> Eeyore > <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> "Peter B. P." wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > You pass off fascism as libertarianism. What a crock of sh.t. Well, yes you are, since you cann't understand the difference. Another proof that your brain is on the fritz, 'Fritz.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 18 Feb 2007 23:34 GMT >> Eeyore wrote: > > kT wrote: > >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> Eeyore >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> "Peter B. P." wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Well, yes you are, since you cann't understand the difference. Another > proof that your brain is on the fritz, 'Fritz. I'm just going by your words. You've expressed your desire to hate and commit violence with almost every post. That's fascism in my book.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
kwag7693@hotmail.com - 18 Feb 2007 23:42 GMT > >> Eeyore wrote: > > kT wrote: > >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> Eeyore > >> <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> "Peter B. P." wrote: [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I'm just going by your words. You've expressed your desire to hate and > commit violence with almost every post. That's fascism in my book. Then your book is full of wrong, idiosyncratic definitions.
kT - 18 Feb 2007 23:45 GMT >>>> Eeyore wrote: > > kT wrote: > >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> Eeyore >>>> <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> "Peter B. P." wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Then your book is full of wrong, idiosyncratic definitions. Yes, all definitions are static. Language never evolves.
It's the fascist way.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:00 GMT > kwag7693@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> > wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Yes, all definitions are static. Language never evolves. Your silly redefinitions of select words to suit your own agenda does not constitute linguistic evolution.
However, it shows your simpleminded arrogance plainly for all to see.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:01 GMT >> kwag7693@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> >> wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > However, it shows your simpleminded arrogance plainly for all to see. And your posts are archived too. I could dig some up, but it would be a waste of time, and only confirm the obvious, that you are a closed fascist masquerading as a libertarian in Denmark.
Your fellow countrymen must be so proud.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:09 GMT > >> kwag7693@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> > >> wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > waste of time, and only confirm the obvious, that you are a closed > fascist masquerading as a libertarian in Denmark. Please dig them up, and let us see if you are lying or not. But I know you are lying. It is your very nature.
And I'm still not a fascist, but a dumbfuck shithead like you wouldn't possibly know the difference between fascmism and libertarianism.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:11 GMT >>>> kwag7693@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> >>>> wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > Please dig them up, and let us see if you are lying or not. But I know > you are lying. It is your very nature. "If guns kill". It's at the bottom of every post.
> And I'm still not a fascist, but a dumbfuck shithead like you wouldn't > possibly know the difference between fascmism and libertarianism. Libertarians are fascists.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
kwag7693@hotmail.com - 19 Feb 2007 00:20 GMT > >>>> kwag7...@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> > >>>> wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Libertarians are fascists. You are having some real difficulties with political terminology; I'd suggest an introductory text.
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:29 GMT >>>>>> kwag7...@hotmail.com wrote: > On Feb 18, 6:34 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> >>>>>> wrote: >> Peter B. P. wrote: >>> kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > You are having some real difficulties with political terminology; I'd > suggest an introductory text. I'm only interested in science.
Since your objections to carbon dioxide induced global warming and climate change have no basis in science, then your objections to the science of climate change and global warming must be political.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
kwag7693@hotmail.com - 19 Feb 2007 00:37 GMT > I'm only interested in science. An interest in understanding the terms you use could be helpful too. Ethics and politics wouldn't hurt either. Art is nice. You shouldn't restrict yourself like that.
> Since your objections to carbon dioxide induced global warming and > climate change have no basis in science, then your objections to the > science of climate change and global warming must be political. In part they are, in part you haven't proved your case. Put those together and they make an exceedingly good reason not to take your conclusions at face value.
Exxon Liars & Thieves - 19 Feb 2007 00:43 GMT Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM
Here's the crime record of one vice-president candidate of the "Libertarian Exxon Front Party"
Instead of arguing, the links to the record of his funders is posted: Koch Industries called Organized Crime on National TV by brother Bill Koch. These are the people you should know and decide that they are your preferred choice to bring you information by their hirlings like "Bawana".
http://snipurl.com/pk51 Google Results for "Charles G. Koch Summer Fellows" CATO Institute.
http://snipurl.com/pk5l Google Results 1 - 100 of about 535 for Koch Interns Cato Institute, Heritage, Hudson Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute.
http://snipurl.com/pk57 Google Results 1 - 100 of about 191 for "Koch Industries" "Organized Crime".
http://snipurl.com/pk5f Google Results 1 - 100 of about 679 for Killer Koch Industries, Smalley.
News Also, The Koch Pipeline Co., LP, another subsidiary of Koch Industries, had agreed to pay some $35 million in fines and penalties for violations of the ... http://waternet.com/news.asp?mode=4&N_ID=14430 - 16k
News Koch hit with record Clean Water Act fine. HOUSTON - The Koch Pipeline Co., ... of Koch Industries, Inc. in Wichita, KS, has agreed to pay some $35 million ... http://waternet.com/news.asp?mode=4&N_ID=11149 - 16k
Forbes.com: Forbes Faces: The Koch Brothers In September 1999, Koch Industries paid $8 million in damages after a ... It was forced to pay a $35 million settlement for 300 separate oil spills in six ... http://www.forbes.com/2001/01/04/0104faces.html - 27k
Forbes.com: Forbes World's Richest People 2001 Brothers Charles and David run Koch Industries, the $35 billion oil ... mishap in its Corpus Christi refinery; the company agreed to pay a $20 million fine. ... http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/10/2001/LIR.jhtml?passListId=10&passYear=200 1&passListType=Person&am... - 70k
StealthPacs.org | Overview of Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE ... CSE co-founder David H. Koch is a member of Cato's board of directors. 13 Koch ... of Koch Industries, an oil and gas company that paid a $35 million fine in ... http://www.stealthpacs.org/profile.cfm?Org_ID=162 - 31k
July/August 2002 - Sierra Magazine - Sierra Club In January, Koch Industries agreed to pay about $35 million for violations of the Clean ... but also to pay a $1 million fine for air- pollution violations. ... http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200207/thinktank.asp - 41k
David H. Koch - SourceWatch Koch Industries received a $30000000.00 criminal fine in March 2000: ... for more than 300 oil spills in five states, prompting a penalty of $35 million. ... http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_H._Koch - 14k
The Center for Public Integrity The owners of Koch Industries, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, the brothers were recently given a $35 million federal fine in ... http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=508 - 35k
The Center for Public Integrity The brothers own Koch Industries, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, which was recently given a $35 million federal fine in connection ... http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=537 - 61k [ More results from www.publicintegrity.org ]
Endgame Directory of Transnational Corporations A federal judge in Austin, TX, has approved a record $35 million civil fine against Kansas-based Koch Industries, ending lawsuits involving about 300 oil ... http://www.endgame.org/dtc/k.html - 47k
EMS Pipeline Services - Regulatory Compliance Those who fail to comply face penalties, which are already reaching record highs, including a $35 million fine for Koch Industries. ... http://www.emspipeline.net/compliance/index.asp - 19k
The Clear and Present Danger of the Sociopathic Insanity of David ... The owners of KOCH INDUSTRIES, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, the brothers were recently given a $35 million federal fine in ... http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Killer_David_Koch.html - 71k
Organized Crime Ring - Killer Koch's Citizens for a Sound Economy Not surprisingly, the industry has lavished more than $440 million over the past six ... and Koch and Ashcroft settled the lawsuit for a $20 million fine, ... http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/CSE_Organized_Crime.html - 67k
Environmental Defense - Press Release: Environmental Defense Says ... Today's proposed fine compares unfavorably to the $35 million fine the US Environmental Protection Agency levied against Koch Industries, Inc. in January of ... http://www.environmentaldefense.org/pressrelease.cfm?ContentID=1230 - 23k
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 01:03 GMT > Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front > helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM > > Here's the crime record of one vice-president candidate of the > "Libertarian Exxon Front Party" Here's a wake up call for you. You really need to get your facts straight:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/long/long15.html
"In short, the 19th-century libertarians observed the rise of the various tendencies that would come together to make fascism – militarism, corporatism, regimentation, nationalist chauvinism, plutocracy in populist guise, the call for "strong leaders" and "national greatness," the glorification of conflict over commerce and of brute force over intellect – and they bitterly opposed the whole package."
http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/000258.html
"...as I explained our opposition to the military-industrial complex and our true free market position as against corporatism which raises up "businessmen" who know how to play politics rather than how to meet the needs of consumers."
http://blog.mises.org/archives/003537.asp
"Bush and Oil: Partners in Corporatism"
http://www.mises.org/journals/lar/pdfs/3_2/3_2_4.pdf
And lots more on Lew Rockwell, mises.org and so on.
Stop posting your usual bullshit, and actually learn something about libertarianismbefor eyou talk about it. Libertarians are NOT CORPORATIST.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Exxon Liars & Thieves - 19 Feb 2007 01:13 GMT > > Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front > > helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Here's a wake up call for you. You really need to get your facts > straight:
> Stop posting your usual bullshit, and actually learn something about > libertarianismbefor eyou talk about it. Libertarians are NOT > CORPORATIST. Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM
Instead of arguing, the links to the record of his funders is posted: Koch Industries called Organized Crime on National TV by brother Bill Koch. These are the people you should know and decide that they are your preferred choice to bring you information by their hirlings like "Bawana".
http://snipurl.com/pk51 Google Results for "Charles G. Koch Summer Fellows" CATO Institute.
http://snipurl.com/pk5l Google Results 1 - 100 of about 535 for Koch Interns Cato Institute, Heritage, Hudson Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute.
http://snipurl.com/pk57 Google Results 1 - 100 of about 191 for "Koch Industries" "Organized Crime".
http://snipurl.com/pk5f Google Results 1 - 100 of about 679 for Killer Koch Industries, Smalley.
News Also, The Koch Pipeline Co., LP, another subsidiary of Koch Industries, had agreed to pay some $35 million in fines and penalties for violations of the ... http://waternet.com/news.asp?mode=4&N_ID=14430 - 16k
News Koch hit with record Clean Water Act fine. HOUSTON - The Koch Pipeline Co., ... of Koch Industries, Inc. in Wichita, KS, has agreed to pay some $35 million ... http://waternet.com/news.asp?mode=4&N_ID=11149 - 16k
Forbes.com: Forbes Faces: The Koch Brothers In September 1999, Koch Industries paid $8 million in damages after a ... It was forced to pay a $35 million settlement for 300 separate oil spills in six ... http://www.forbes.com/2001/01/04/0104faces.html - 27k
Forbes.com: Forbes World's Richest People 2001 Brothers Charles and David run Koch Industries, the $35 billion oil ... mishap in its Corpus Christi refinery; the company agreed to pay a $20 million fine. ... http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/10/2001/LIR.jhtml?passListId=10&passYear=200 1&passListType=Person&am... - 70k
StealthPacs.org | Overview of Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE ... CSE co-founder David H. Koch is a member of Cato's board of directors. 13 Koch ... of Koch Industries, an oil and gas company that paid a $35 million fine in ... http://www.stealthpacs.org/profile.cfm?Org_ID=162 - 31k
July/August 2002 - Sierra Magazine - Sierra Club In January, Koch Industries agreed to pay about $35 million for violations of the Clean ... but also to pay a $1 million fine for air- pollution violations. ... http://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/200207/thinktank.asp - 41k
David H. Koch - SourceWatch Koch Industries received a $30000000.00 criminal fine in March 2000: ... for more than 300 oil spills in five states, prompting a penalty of $35 million. ... http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_H._Koch - 14k
The Center for Public Integrity The owners of Koch Industries, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, the brothers were recently given a $35 million federal fine in ... http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=508 - 35k
The Center for Public Integrity The brothers own Koch Industries, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, which was recently given a $35 million federal fine in connection ... http://www.publicintegrity.org/report.aspx?aid=537 - 61k [ More results from www.publicintegrity.org ]
Endgame Directory of Transnational Corporations A federal judge in Austin, TX, has approved a record $35 million civil fine against Kansas-based Koch Industries, ending lawsuits involving about 300 oil ... http://www.endgame.org/dtc/k.html - 47k
EMS Pipeline Services - Regulatory Compliance Those who fail to comply face penalties, which are already reaching record highs, including a $35 million fine for Koch Industries. ... http://www.emspipeline.net/compliance/index.asp - 19k
The Clear and Present Danger of the Sociopathic Insanity of David ... The owners of KOCH INDUSTRIES, the nation's second wealthiest privately owned business, the brothers were recently given a $35 million federal fine in ... http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/Killer_David_Koch.html - 71k
Organized Crime Ring - Killer Koch's Citizens for a Sound Economy Not surprisingly, the industry has lavished more than $440 million over the past six ... and Koch and Ashcroft settled the lawsuit for a $20 million fine, ... http://www.ecosyn.us/adti/CSE_Organized_Crime.html - 67k
Environmental Defense - Press Release: Environmental Defense Says ... Today's proposed fine compares unfavorably to the $35 million fine the US Environmental Protection Agency levied against Koch Industries, Inc. in January of ... http://www.environmentaldefense.org/pressrelease.cfm?ContentID=1230 - 23k
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 01:27 GMT > > > Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front > > > helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Definition of "Libertarianism" = a Corporate Organized Crime Front > helping OILY INC rule the world, = FASCISM since you snipped my references to the contrary away, i'll give you another chance to read them.
Here's a wake up call for you. You really need to get your facts straight:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/long/long15.html
"In short, the 19th-century libertarians observed the rise of the various tendencies that would come together to make fascism – militarism, corporatism, regimentation, nationalist chauvinism, plutocracy in populist guise, the call for "strong leaders" and "national greatness," the glorification of conflict over commerce and of brute force over intellect – and they bitterly opposed the whole package."
http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/000258.html
"...as I explained our opposition to the military-industrial complex and our true free market position as against corporatism which raises up "businessmen" who know how to play politics rather than how to meet the needs of consumers."
http://blog.mises.org/archives/003537.asp
"Bush and Oil: Partners in Corporatism"
http://www.mises.org/journals/lar/pdfs/3_2/3_2_4.pdf
And lots more on Lew Rockwell, mises.org and so on.
Stop posting your usual bullshit, and actually learn something about libertarianismbefor eyou talk about it. Libertarians are NOT CORPORATIST.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:43 GMT >> I'm only interested in science. > > An interest in understanding the terms you use could be helpful too. > Ethics and politics wouldn't hurt either. Art is nice. You shouldn't > restrict yourself like that. They aren't all that helpful when discussing the evidence, but if you'd like to peruse some artistic science there is always :
http://www.globalwarmingart.com
>> Since your objections to carbon dioxide induced global warming and >> climate change have no basis in science, then your objections to the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > together and they make an exceedingly good reason not to take your > conclusions at face value. One doesn't prove a theory, one proves a theorem.
The theory has been more than adequately demonstrated, however for political reasons you feel the need to further your agenda with disinformation and smearing tactics very similar to fascism.
That's how scientific illiterates like you operate.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:48 GMT > >>> And I'm still not a fascist, but a dumbfuck shithead like you wouldn't > >>> possibly know the difference between fascmism and libertarianism. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > climate change have no basis in science, then your objections to the > science of climate change and global warming must be political. You're in broken record mode.
Take your meds.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Retief - 26 Feb 2007 05:35 GMT >I'm only interested in science. You mispelled "politics" as "science"...
>Since your objections to carbon dioxide induced global warming and >climate change have no basis in science, then your objections to the >science of climate change and global warming must be political. Here is an example of you "no basis in science" claim:
http://uploader.wuerzburg.de/mm-physik/klima/artefact.htm
The author notes that CO2 doubling provides no significant change in transmission for the 15 um band, when in competition with water. That is, a doubling of CO2 results in a 0.054 W/m^2 increase in power absorption (which is a far cry from the 4 W/m^2 the IPCC claims).
Perhaps you'd like to present your proof of AGW?
Retief
VistaJustWorks - 26 Feb 2007 07:34 GMT "Retief" <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... No, clearly he didn't. But we do see you trying to claim that science is politics.
Scum sucking Libertarians like Retief are like that, confusing their own political liedeologies with reality.
What do the consensus of scientists say on this matter....
The conclusions in this statement reflect the scientific consensus represented by, for example, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the joint National Academies' statement.
For more information, see the AAAS Global Climate-Change Resources page.
American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS Board Releases New Statement on Climate Change --------------------------------------------------- - 18 February 2007 -
The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now.
The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, a critical greenhouse gas, is higher than it has been for at least 650,000 years. The average temperature of the Earth is heading for levels not experienced for millions of years. Scientific predictions of the impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels and deforestation match observed changes. As expected, intensification of droughts, heat waves, floods, wildfires, and severe storms is occurring, with a mounting toll on vulnerable ecosystems and societies. These events are early warning signs of even more devastating damage to come, some of which will be irreversible.
Delaying action to address climate change will increase the environmental and societal consequences as well as the costs. The longer we wait to tackle climate change, the harder and more expensive the task will be. History provides many examples of society confronting grave threats by mobilizing knowledge and promoting innovation. We need an aggressive research, development and deployment effort to transform the existing and future energy systems of the world away from technologies that emit greenhouse gases. Developing clean energy technologies will provide economic opportunities and ensure future energy supplies. In addition to rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it is essential that we develop strategies to adapt to ongoing changes and make communities more resilient to future changes.
The growing torrent of information presents a clear message: we are already experiencing global climate change. It is time to muster the political will for concerted action. Stronger leadership at all levels is needed. The time is now. We must rise to the challenge. We owe this to future generations.
-- The American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Triple A-S" (AAAS), is an international non-profit organization dedicated to advancing science around the world by serving as an educator, leader, spokesperson and professional association. In addition to organizing membership activities, AAAS publishes the journal Science, as well as many scientific newsletters, books and reports, and spearheads programs that raise the bar of understanding for science worldwide.
Arnold Walker - 26 Feb 2007 08:11 GMT > "Retief" <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote in message >> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Scum sucking Libertarians like Retief are like that, confusing their own > political liedeologies with reality. Actually the IPCC is the political summary for UN leaders on the longer science report that won't be out for another 1 and half months.
> What do the consensus of scientists say on this matter.... That there are some alarmist overstating thier findings for political purposes for starts. Gee I wonder where they could have got that.....could it be that Al Gore did a book and movie predicting as many yards of tidal rise as scienctist did in inches. Each page of the IPCC equals to summary of a hundred pages in the full science report.
> The conclusions in this statement reflect the scientific > consensus represented by, for example, the [quoted text clipped - 66 lines] > scientific newsletters, books and reports, and spearheads programs that > raise the bar of understanding for science worldwide. VistaJustWorks - 26 Feb 2007 08:19 GMT > Actually the IPCC is the political summary for UN leaders on the longer > science report that won't be out > for another 1 and half months. Wrong again Arnold. The IPCC is the International Panel on Climate Change, and it's members are people, not a written document. The panel consists of over 2,500 members who review the climatalogical literature and produce a grand meta-analysis of the scientific findings.
What does the consensus of the worlds scientists say about the matter...
The conclusions in this statement reflect the scientific consensus represented by, for example, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the joint National Academies' statement.
For more information, see the AAAS Global Climate-Change Resources page.
American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS Board Releases New Statement on Climate Change --------------------------------------------------- - 18 February 2007 -
The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now.
The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, a critical greenhouse gas, is higher than it has been for at least 650,000 years. The average temperature of the Earth is heading for levels not experienced for millions of years. Scientific predictions of the impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels and deforestation match observed changes. As expected, intensification of droughts, heat waves, floods, wildfires, and severe storms is occurring, with a mounting toll on vulnerable ecosystems and societies. These events are early warning signs of even more devastating damage to come, some of which will be irreversible.
Delaying action to address climate change will increase the environmental and societal consequences as well as the costs. The longer we wait to tackle climate change, the harder and more expensive the task will be. History provides many examples of society confronting grave threats by mobilizing knowledge and promoting innovation. We need an aggressive research, development and deployment effort to transform the existing and future energy systems of the world away from technologies that emit greenhouse gases. Developing clean energy technologies will provide economic opportunities and ensure future energy supplies. In addition to rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it is essential that we develop strategies to adapt to ongoing changes and make communities more resilient to future changes.
The growing torrent of information presents a clear message: we are already experiencing global climate change. It is time to muster the political will for concerted action. Stronger leadership at all levels is needed. The time is now. We must rise to the challenge. We owe this to future generations.
-- The American Association for the Advancement of Science, "Triple A-S" (AAAS), is an international non-profit organization dedicated to advancing science around the world by serving as an educator, leader, spokesperson and professional association. In addition to organizing membership activities, AAAS publishes the journal Science, as well as many scientific newsletters, books and reports, and spearheads programs that raise the bar of understanding for science worldwide.
Lloyd - 26 Feb 2007 15:11 GMT On Feb 26, 3:11 am, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> > "Retief" <nos...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message > >> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > science report that won't be out > for another 1 and half months. Has any IPCC scientist said it does not reflect the actual report? No.
> > What do the consensus of scientists say on this matter.... > > That there are some alarmist overstating thier findings for political > purposes for starts. You are lying.
> Gee I wonder where they could have got that.....could it be that Al Gore did > a book and movie > predicting as many yards of tidal rise as scienctist did in inches. > Each page of the IPCC equals to summary of a hundred pages in the full > science report. Again, has any IPCC scientist said the summary is incorrect? No.
Arnold Walker - 26 Feb 2007 15:48 GMT > On Feb 26, 3:11 am, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Again, has any IPCC scientist said the summary is incorrect? No. Mainly because most of them are not scientist in the first place. They just compiled info from a science report. And as to lying you do enorgh for both of us.....
VistaJustWorks - 26 Feb 2007 08:34 GMT > Mainly because most of them are not scientist in the first place. > They just compiled info from a science report. > And as to lying you do enorgh for both of us..... Aahahahaha.. You pathetic sh.t licking Liar.
All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them, working on the IPCC reports are scientists.
You on the other hand are a lying AmeriKKKan dung eater.
Me - 27 Feb 2007 20:10 GMT > All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them, working on > the IPCC reports are scientists. Hmmmmmmm, apparently English is your second language....... just about evey Grade Schooler, can see what is wrong with the above statement.....
Me so what's your excuse........
VistaJustWorks - 26 Feb 2007 23:15 GMT "Me" <Me@shadow.orgs> wrote Nothing of consequence
All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them working on the IPCC reports - are scientists.
Arnold Walker - 28 Feb 2007 17:17 GMT > "Me" <Me@shadow.orgs> wrote Nothing of consequence > > All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them working on > the IPCC reports - are scientists. No,the 2500 scientist did the science report that the IPCC is summarizing.
Lloyd - 28 Feb 2007 20:38 GMT On Feb 28, 12:17 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> > "Me" <M...@shadow.orgs> wrote Nothing of consequence > > > All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them working on > > the IPCC reports - are scientists. > > No,the 2500 scientist did the science report that the IPCC is summarizing. The IPCC _is_ the group of scientists, as he tried to tell you.
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Joe Fischer - 28 Feb 2007 23:57 GMT >> No,the 2500 scientist did the science report that the IPCC is summarizing. > >The IPCC _is_ the group of scientists, as he tried to tell you. Instead of arguments, how about facts.
http://www.ipcc.ch/about/faq/IPCC%20Who%20is%20who.pdf
Joe Fischer I am not a conservative political party.
Gonna Bust Up Exxon's Crime Ring - 01 Mar 2007 00:28 GMT > >> No,the 2500 scientist did the science report that the IPCC is summarizing. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Joe Fischer I am not a conservative political party. define Libertarianism: anti-social personality, maniac, mental case*, nutcase*, psycho*, psychotic, schizo, schizoid*, egocentric, egoistic, egoistical, egomaniacal, egotistic, egotistical, greedy*, hog, mean, mercenary, miserly, narcissistic, narrow, narrow-minded, parsimonious, prejudiced, self-centered, self-indulgent, self- interested, self-seeking, stingy, ungenerous, acquisitive, avaricious, avid, close-fisted, eager, envious, esurient, gluttonous, grabby, grasping, green-eyed*, grudging, hogging, itchy*, jealous, jelly, keen, mercenary, piggish*, prehensile, rapacious, ravenous, selfish, swinish*, voracious, yearning
Exxon Liars & Crooks - 28 Feb 2007 23:14 GMT On Feb 28, 9:17 am, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> wrote:
> > "Me" <M...@shadow.orgs> wrote Nothing of consequence > > > All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them working on > > the IPCC reports - are scientists. > > No,the 2500 scientist did the science report that the IPCC is summarizing. define Libertarianism = sociopaths, liars, crooks, thieves, anarchists, anti-social
Me - 28 Feb 2007 22:50 GMT > "Me" <Me@shadow.orgs> wrote Nothing of consequence > > All of the scientists - and there are well over 2,500 of them working on > the IPCC reports - are scientists. So we all now know that you can correctly FIX a Stupid Grammatical Error, that no Grade Schooler would have made in the first place.
Now if you would be so nice as to define your term "Scientist".... there hasn't been an actuall "Scientist" in a couple of hundwred years. Oh we have all kinds of Climatologist, Geologist, Chemists, and other of Scientific repute, but the Fields of Science, are now so broad that no one human can possibly claim to be a "Scientist"
Me just wondering if your definition is like the rest of your Blather......
Retief - 28 Feb 2007 05:01 GMT >> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... > > No, clearly he didn't. But we do see you trying to claim that science is >politics. Not at all, Scott. What I'm claiming is that you PRETEND that you are doing science, when in fact all you are doing is promoting political views via fraud.
Retief
VistaJustWorks - 27 Feb 2007 08:49 GMT >>> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... "VistaJustWorks" <BushIsATraitor@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> No, clearly he didn't. But we do see you trying to claim that science >> is >>politics. "Retief" <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote> Not at all, Scott.
And that statement makes you a liar.
> What I'm claiming is that you PRETEND that you are doing science, when in > fact all > you are doing is promoting political views via fraud. To believe that one would have to believe that all of the worlds scientists are conspiring against your own personal political liedeology.
And that would just be insane now wouldn't it, sh.t Licker.
Arnold Walker - 28 Feb 2007 18:49 GMT >>>> You mispelled "politics" as "science"... > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > And that would just be insane now wouldn't it, sh.t Licker. And the lie goes on ....with the insult comfirming the lie you where pushing.
Retief - 09 Mar 2007 01:45 GMT >> What I'm claiming is that you PRETEND that you are doing science, when in >> fact all > you are doing is promoting political views via fraud. > > To believe that one would have to believe that all of the worlds >scientists are conspiring against your own personal political liedeology. No, we would simply have to understand that Scott Nudds (aka Vista, Vendicar, and other nyms) publicly stated goals are to murder the President of the United States and to destroy the United States. And if Scott can destroy the US economy, by his support of bogus "science", that would align well with Scott's stated goals.
Retief
Vendicar Decarian - 08 Mar 2007 09:53 GMT > No, we would simply have to understand that Scott Nudds (aka Vista, > Vendicar, and other nyms) publicly stated goals are to murder the > President of the United States You Liar. If that was my goal, the Retard in the White House would already be dead. If asked by a U.S. court to act as Bush's executioner, I will however happily oblige.
Impeach Bush Arrest Bush Torture Bush Try Bush Convict Bush Torture Bush Execute Bush
And the rest of the sicophants who have aided in his campaign of mass murder.
> and to destroy the United States. Oh yes. Extermination of the AmeriKKKan state is onging and the goal of all moral people.
> And if Scott can destroy the US economy, by his support of bogus > "science", that would align well with Scott's stated goals. The use of real science has been much more entertaining and fascinating.
Using real science necessitates you AmeriKKKan f.ck tards to lie to yourselves in order to justify your actions, and those lies and the web of distortions and lies needed to support them are delusions that are assisting in extinguishing the AmeriKKKan state.
Retief Reichwinger Exxon Shill - 09 Mar 2007 02:02 GMT > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:49:13 -0800, "VistaJustWorks" > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Retief Bogus Exxon Science is used to promote Mass Murder For Oil. Why is Mass Murder good if YOU do it, but BAD if somebody else does it?
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:41 GMT > On Feb 18, 7:11 pm, kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: > Peter B. P. wrote: > > > kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote: > > >> Peter B. P. wrote: > >>> kT [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > You are having some real difficulties with political terminology; I'd > suggest an introductory text. Better suggest a good psychiatrist. The kid needs it, very very badly.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:25 GMT > Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. > wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> kwag7693@hotmail.com [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > "If guns kill". It's at the bottom of every post. *headdesk*
Hypothetical analogies do not constitute the threat of violence, you f.cking, lying, smearing, arrogant, demented, mentally ill dumbfuck king of all dumbfucks.
> > And I'm still not a fascist, but a dumbfuck shithead like you wouldn't > > possibly know the difference between fascmism and libertarianism. > > Libertarians are fascists. You are a demented dumbfuck if you even believe that for a second. But we already knew this.
You, sir, are a prime example why it was an grave error to stop forcibly locking people up in mental institutions some decades back. You belong there. You are a prime candidate for acute psyshiatric treatment. You are not sane, and you do not belong in society among sane people.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:27 GMT >> Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. >> wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> kwag7693@hotmail.com [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > there. You are a prime candidate for acute psyshiatric treatment. You > are not sane, and you do not belong in society among sane people. Wow, wonderful meltdown Borg. Since your objections to carbon dioxide induced global warming and climate change have no basis in science, and your website is filled with political demagoguery, then your objections to science must be political.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 00:41 GMT > >> Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. > >> wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> kwag7693@hotmail.com [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > your website is filled with political demagoguery, then your objections > to science must be political. Now listen up, Elifritz, because my patience with your idiocy is wearing dangerously thin:
I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop global warming, or serve big-government statist political interests, such as Kyoto is currently doing.
Is that clear? Or do I have to spell it out for you?
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 00:45 GMT >>>> Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. >>>> wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> kwag7693@hotmail.com [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > Now listen up, Elifritz, because my patience with your idiocy is wearing > dangerously thin: Yes, you might go postal and start invoking violence any second now.
> I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that > will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop > global warming, or serve big-government statist political interests, > such as Kyoto is currently doing. In other words, you object to science for political reasons.
> Is that clear? Or do I have to spell it out for you? I can spell it out for you. You are a F A S C I S T masquerading as a Libertarian. Kyoto has nothing to do with science other than acknowledging that we need to start reducing emission in a big way.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 01:03 GMT > Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. > wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Peter B. P. wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > Yes, you might go postal and start invoking violence any second now. Sorry to disappint you, moron, but I will not. That's only in your sick mind.
> > I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that > > will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop > > global warming, or serve big-government statist political interests, > > such as Kyoto is currently doing. > > In other words, you object to science for political reasons. Kyoto is not science, it IS POLITICS, you dumb f.cking moron.
> > Is that clear? Or do I have to spell it out for you? > > I can spell it out for you. You are a F A S C I S T masquerading as a > Libertarian. You are a lying, hateful, smearing, dumbfuck, demented moron masquerading as a scientist.
> Kyoto has nothing to do with science AT least you recognize it for what it is.
Now take your meds, you idiot dumbfuck.
-- regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 01:08 GMT >> Peter B. P. wrote: > kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: > >> Peter B. P. >> wrote: >>> kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Peter B. P. wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > Sorry to disappint you, moron, but I will not. That's only in your sick > mind. So where is the danger, besides the runaway global warming danger?
>>> I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that >>> will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop >>> global warming, or serve big-government statist political interests, >>> such as Kyoto is currently doing.
>> In other words, you object to science for political reasons. > > Kyoto is not science, it IS POLITICS, you dumb f.cking moron. So you object to politics, because you can't object to the science.
>>> Is that clear? Or do I have to spell it out for you? >> I can spell it out for you. You are a F A S C I S T masquerading as a >> Libertarian.
> You are a lying, hateful, smearing, dumbfuck, demented moron > masquerading as a scientist. I feel your pain, really I do. Medicine is based upon science.
>> Kyoto has nothing to do with science > > AT least you recognize it for what it is. Kyoto is irrelevant. You object to any emissions reduction because you object to the science. Kyoto is just your scapegoat because you are utterly unable to grasp how science operates and completely unable to appreciate the results it delivers. None of us are happy with the pollution and the runaway global warming we are facing, but that is the reality of our situation, and the sooner you get used to it, the sooner we can all begin the process of solving the problems using science.
> Now take your meds, you idiot dumbfuck. Science is my medicine.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 01:27 GMT > >>> I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that > >>> will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > So you object to politics, because you can't object to the science. Can't your read? I do NOT object to the science.
> >>> Is that clear? Or do I have to spell it out for you? > >> I can spell it out for you. You are a F A S C I S T masquerading as a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I feel your pain, really I do. Medicine is based upon science. Then take your medicine. You need it.
> >> Kyoto has nothing to do with science > > > > AT least you recognize it for what it is. > > Kyoto is irrelevant. You object to any emissions reduction because you > object to the science. No, I do not. You are deluded, demented and mentally ill. Get help.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 01:32 GMT >>>>> I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that >>>>> will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Can't your read? I do NOT object to the science. Then what do you not understand about the reality of runaway global warming and the danger it presents to civilization, and what do you not understand about a radical reduction in emissions as the only way to stop it? Clearly at the rate we are going we will be in the 3 to 5 ppm per year range of increase, and in short order we will be looking at CO2 concentrations in excess of 1000 ppm, completely neglecting positive feedback effects. Clearly you don't care, since you will have passed on before the danger becomes extreme, but we are entering the danger zone right now, if you haven't noticed. Or haven't you noticed? Is Denmark that isolated? The danger is everywhere you look, extreme weather, floods, drought, stronger more frequent hurricanes, sea level rising.
> No, I do not. You are deluded, demented and mentally ill. Get help. Yes, I can recognize danger when I see it, and people with your attitude are a danger to society. That is why I confront you with the evidence.
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
Peter B. P. - 19 Feb 2007 01:39 GMT > >>>>> I do not object to AGW. I object to shortsighted political action that > >>>>> will do harm to the global economy while doing little or nothing to stop [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Then what do you not understand about the reality of runaway global > warming and the danger it presents to civilization, The danger is miniscule and you and other catastrophists are blowing it way out of proprtion.
> and what do you not > understand about a radical reduction in emissions as the only way to [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > feedback effects. Clearly you don't care, since you will have passed on > before the danger becomes extreme, No, I will not. Your lack of perspecitve shows.
> but we are entering the danger zone > right now, if you haven't noticed. Or haven't you noticed? Is Denmark > that isolated? The danger is everywhere you look, extreme weather, > floods, drought, stronger more frequent hurricanes, More storms. So what, that can be prepared for.
> sea level rising. Sea leve will rise about 44 cm by 2100 according to the IPCC. That is not a significant danger to civilization.
> > No, I do not. You are deluded, demented and mentally ill. Get help. > > Yes, I can recognize danger when I see it All I recognize is a deluded individual with an overinflated ego. That is you, sonny.
You're a con artist with a clearly limited perspective hiding behind science. The science does not support your catastrophist worldview.
 Signature regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?
kT - 19 Feb 2007 01:55 GMT > You're a con artist with a clearly limited perspective hiding behind > science. The science does not support your catastrophist worldview. Science shows many possible catastrophes, the most recent being Yellowstone and Toba. Global warming is just another average catastrophe, one of many different varieties of average catastrophes.
http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/southeast_asia/indonesia/toba.html
 Signature Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
raylopez99 - 25 Feb 2007 12:26 GMT > > Then what do you not understand about the reality of runaway global > > warming and the danger it presents to civilization, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Sea leve will rise about 44 cm by 2100 according to the IPCC. That is > not a significant danger to civilization. Peter B.P. you are absolutely correct in this thread. I could not have said it better myself.
BTW from a fellow Liberarian (which I understand you are) it's interesting that yet another Montreal Protocol meeting is being planned for this year, yet _not_ on the agenda is whether India, China manufacturers should cut certain emissions of certain gases that harm the Ozone Layer, despite being _allowed_ by the Montreal Protocol. Read the NY Times article at this thread: http://tinyurl.com/3cepnr ("Haier, a big Chinese manufacturer of air-conditioners, said in a statement that it had voluntarily begun shipping to the United States only models that use more advanced refrigerants, which do not damage the ozone layer")
Long story short: manufacturers are agreeing to limit making these gases, voluntarily. No need to get governments involved.
Likewise, GW could be easily cured, if it's found that CO2 is such a menance, by voluntary cooperation IMO. Something like a "Green Label" and peer pressure (power to ostracize, including boycotts) should work to stop excessive CO2 pollution, with no need for drastic "cap and trade" or other such productivity blocking means.
RL
Joe Fischer - 19 Feb 2007 04:02 GMT >Then what do you not understand about the reality of runaway global >warming and the danger it presents to civilization,  
|
|