I have a set of harmonics, amplitudes and phases, for local tide prediction.
I was going to have a go at constructing the formula
h(t) = H0 + sum( H(i) * cos( w(i) * t + phase (i)))
in a maths application with the angular velocities
28.984 ,30.000 ,28.440, 15.041, 13.943 degree/hour etc
But how to sysnchronise the virtual generator with real world tides ?
Run the formula for "5 years" say and find the highest high, lowest low,
lowest high, highest low, rare event like a double low and match to such
single events in the real world , or how ?
Is there a set of more precise numbers for the above angular velocities, I
can only find that set of precision on the web.
Over the months comparing the 2 local on-line, near real-time tide plots
http://www.pol.ac.uk/ntslf/pltdata_tgi_ntslf_v2.php?code=Bournemouth&span=1
and
http://www.pol.ac.uk/ntslf/pltdata_tgi_ntslf_v2.php?code=Portsmouth&span=1
the Bournemouth one , around springs, always deviates strongly from the
predicted, in shape rather than just barometric or storm effects. Is that
likely due to extensive sea defense works around the Bournemouth area and
marine gravel dredging a bit farther away, having disturbed the harmonics ?
N Cook - 14 Apr 2007 08:08 GMT
for "around springs" read "around neaps"
N Cook - 18 Apr 2007 07:51 GMT
> I have a set of harmonics, amplitudes and phases, for local tide prediction.
> I was going to have a go at constructing the formula
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> can only find that set of precision on the web.
> Over the months comparing the 2 local on-line, near real-time tide plots
http://www.pol.ac.uk/ntslf/pltdata_tgi_ntslf_v2.php?code=Bournemouth&span=1
> and
> http://www.pol.ac.uk/ntslf/pltdata_tgi_ntslf_v2.php?code=Portsmouth&span=1
> the Bournemouth one , around neaps, always deviates strongly from the
> predicted, in shape rather than just barometric or storm effects. Is that
> likely due to extensive sea defense works around the Bournemouth area and
> marine gravel dredging a bit farther away, having disturbed the harmonics ?
A more accurate set of velocities, for anyone else, is
28.9841042
30
28.4397295
15.0410686
13.9430356
57.9682084
58.9841042
87.9682086
86.9523127
29.9589333
29.5284789
27.8953548
29.4556253
28.5125831
59.0662424
87.4966876
57.4238344
0.0410686
0.0821373
0.5443747
1.0158958
1.0980331
The plot shapes look right for Southampton,Hampshire young flood stands and
double high waters but so far I've not managed to pattern-match anywhere
within a 30 year virtual set with sets of hydrographic office/POL
predictions.
--
some local Southampton trivia
http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/graff.htm