Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Oceanography / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Thermohaline Ocean Circulation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Phil Holman - 24 Feb 2008 00:51 GMT
I've been studying the subject circulation and can't quite agree with
the explanation in the text. While I see change in density of seawater
(temperature and salinity) as driving vertical movement, I don't see
this as driving lateral movement.

For example, deep water moving south out of the North Atlantic. Isn't it
the accumulation of warm water from the south (wind driven) causing a
sea level rise and the resulting greater pressure forcing out deeper
water?

And again in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, warm surface water moving
south westerly (wind driven) causes a lower sea level and lower pressure
for deeper water to move into the region and replace the surface water.

My physics background has me demoting the thermohaline process to a
second order effect rather than a prime mover. Can anyone provide
discussion/clarification on this point?

Phil H
vijithvnair@gmail.com - 26 Feb 2008 05:13 GMT
friend
it seems that you dont have any doubt that thermohaline effect would
cause a vertical motion. colder (saltier) water is denser than warmer
(fresh) water. the denser water would sink. inorder to conserve
continuity of mass/volume , water has to come laterally and replace
the vertically displaced water parcel. this drives a thermohaline
circulation. anyhow, oceanic circulations could not be explained on
the basis of simple wind driving or thermohaline drivings. they do not
take the form of a sheet like continous motion, as many schematic
diagrams depicts. these diagrams only give a spatially and temporally
averaged picture. oceanic currents are discontinuous, at times breaks
into  eddies and dissipate its energy. the forces that drive these
currents can be wind, thermohaline. currents can also be forced
remotely by baroclinic waves viz Kelvin and Rossby waves. They get
modified by small scale processes such as tides, river runoff etc..
regards
viji

> I've been studying the subject circulation and can't quite agree with
> the explanation in the text. While I see change in density of seawater
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Phil H
Phil Holman - 28 Feb 2008 02:05 GMT
> friend
> it seems that you dont have any doubt that thermohaline effect would
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> regards
> viji

Viji, thanks for your response. I guess the whole thing is a lot more
complicated than the simplistic account I've been reading (Garrison's
Oceanography and Tarbuck and Lutgens' Earth Science). The fact the
surface water moves several orders of magnitude faster than deep water
allows for the intervention of all kinds of other effects.

If the polar icecaps continue to melt, it will be interesting to see how
that effects the haline part of the process.

Phil H
Weatherlawyer - 08 Mar 2008 07:30 GMT
> <vijithvn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> ews:7a78dad7-cf0a-47fc-aeb0-bbe40a6aaee6@p43g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > cause a vertical motion. colder (saltier) water is denser than warmer
> > (fresh) water. the denser water would sink.

Warmer saltier water at the tropics as the North Atlantic supplies
denser water to the lower layers aught to force the Arctic cold back
home rather than unite to invade the Waddel sea.

> I guess the whole thing is a lot more
> complicated than the simplistic account I've been reading (Garrison's
> Oceanography and Tarbuck and Lutgens' Earth Science). The fact the
> surface water moves several orders of magnitude faster than deep water
> allows for the intervention of all kinds of other effects.

The air impact on surface currents drops off immediately as the force
needed increases by orders of magnitude meets inertia and complex
reactions to keep the status quo.

> If the polar icecaps continue to melt, it will be interesting to see how
> that effects the haline part of the process.

What exactly is the physics background you have?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.