Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

High attenuation with multimode fibers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dennis - 10 Apr 2008 18:24 GMT
Hello,

I have a problem with multimode fibers. The attenuation of the fibers
is about 1.5 db/km @ 1300nm and about 3.2 db/km @ 850 nm.
I haven't had such a problem before. Normally, the attenuation of the
fibers is less then 0.6 dB/km @ 1300nm and less then 2.4 dB/km @ 850
nm.
It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
experience with this topic?
Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".

BTW, there are 4 fibers in a metallic tube with a diameter of 1.42 mm.

Greeting,

Dennis
Walter Gryder - 11 Apr 2008 04:06 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Dennis

What is the diameter of the fiber core?  Could it be that you're
measuring a fiber with a larger core diameter than you typically
encounter?  A larger fiber core region (62.5 microns rather than 50
microns, for example) would display higher attenuation characteristics.
Dennis - 11 Apr 2008 09:41 GMT
> > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -

It is a fiber with 50 µm core!
Arnie Berkers - 11 Apr 2008 11:27 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Dennis

The excess length of the fibres in the metallic tube could be too
high. This would result in microbending problems.
To check this you can cur a piece of tube of 5 to 10 meters, measure
it exactly and then measure the exact length of the fibre in the tube.
Normally the fibres should be about 0.1 to 0.4 % longer than the tube.

Arnie
Dennis - 14 Apr 2008 15:47 GMT
> > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Arnie

The supplier send us test certificates of every single tube, where the
excess length is
specified between 0.09% to 0.15%.
I have 2 FIMT laying in the same way with nearly the same excess
length.
But you're right, we have had a problem with the excess length before
and
we have to check the excess length again.

Dennis
Arnie Berkers - 14 Apr 2008 21:59 GMT
> > > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

Did you process or treat these tubes in a certain way?
The excess length is measured locally and is normally a good
indication for the complete length, except when something went wrong.
Did you contact your supplier about this? Is it the big one D* or the
small one B*?
Arnie
DM - 13 Apr 2008 00:23 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> fibers is less then 0.6 dB/km @ 1300nm and less then 2.4 dB/km @ 850
> nm.

Are these the losses obtained from teh OTDR traces

How long are the fibre

> It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.

Just curious but how do you check this?

> On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
> In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
> experience with this topic?

It would be unusual to have consistent micro/marco bending along the
whole length of a long fibre  however the fibre could be spiralled
around each other. How does the physical length of the cable compare
with the computed length from OTDR measurements.  OTDR measrurmetns will
of course only be as good as teh known effective index of the fibre.

> Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".

Do they measure the same loss with a laser - power meter test set?
 If you use a single mode laser and under fill the fibre then the loss
would be less sensitive to microbending

cheers

David

> BTW, there are 4 fibers in a metallic tube with a diameter of 1.42 mm.
>
> Greeting,
>
> Dennis
Dennis - 14 Apr 2008 16:07 GMT
> > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Are these the losses obtained from teh OTDR traces

Yes!

> How long are the fibre

Between 400m and 700m.

> > It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
>
> Just curious but how do you check this?

A company met us with a new measuring system.  They were able to
check, if the hydrogen peak becomes greater and widen at a specific
wavelength. In my opinion, the were checking at 1385nm the amount of
the hydrogen peak and compared it to fibers with good attenuation.

> > On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
> > In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> with the computed length from OTDR measurements.  OTDR measrurmetns will
> of course only be as good as teh known effective index of the fibre.

There are two tubes laying the same way with the same length. Both
tubes
are having the nearly the same excess length. They were delivered by
the
same supplier.
I guess you're right with the index. But in my opinion is the failure,
when we're using
the wrong index, nonserious.

> > Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".
>
> Do they measure the same loss with a laser - power meter test set?
>   If you use a single mode laser and under fill the fibre then the loss
> would be less sensitive to microbending

I was not able to measure th loss with a power meter.
Do you mean, that when I'm measuring the MM-fibers with a single mode
laser
at 1330 nm and 1550 nm, I would get a general statement if it's
microbending
or not? What kind of results would I expect?

> cheers
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> > Dennis
DM - 19 Apr 2008 22:09 GMT
>>> Hello,
>>> I have a problem with multimode fibers. The attenuation of the fibers
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Between 400m and 700m.

Fairly short lengths - is teh attentuation an automatic or manual
measurement
I take it the OTDR is using a short pulse length and the measurment
isn't geting corrupted by near end dead zone, ... or tail end of a
Fresnel reflection from connector uniting.

>>> It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
>> Just curious but how do you check this?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wavelength. In my opinion, the were checking at 1385nm the amount of
> the hydrogen peak and compared it to fibers with good attenuation.

OK that was just a minor confusion, I'd consider this an OH peak.

>>> On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
>>> In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> when we're using
> the wrong index, nonserious.

You supplier will quote the measureed cable length, not the measured
fibre length- at least that's what I spec., and get when I order cable,
although generally this is single mode fibre.

Do you have a good similar cabled fibre?  If so test it, get a decent
figure for effetive index assuming fibre L = cable L, Now use this value
of eff. index with your poor cable.
is the fibre length significantly differnt from cabled length

>>> Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".
>> Do they measure the same loss with a laser - power meter test set?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> microbending
> or not? What kind of results would I expect?

if it is micro bending I'd expect higher loss when the modes are all
excited- higher order modes will see higher loss.

If you use a single mode laser and only excite low order modes then they
should not suffer the same micro bending losses.

I'd expect fairly large differences for microbending with single mode
fibres at 1310 and 1550nm, but not necessarily with multi mode fibres.
However as above if it;s micro bending then I'd expect differnces when
launched only low order modes, and exciting all modes. e.g. measuring
loss with a laser and with an LED.

Another point is that most cable manufacturers make on line measurements
of cabled fibre losses with there own OTDR, do they have anytthing to
say on this front?

cheers

David
Badnitz - 02 Jul 2008 16:58 GMT
Hi Dennis,

We have had "problems" with fibres in metallic tubes before, but I suggest
you find out what specification your supplier use, because those attenuation
figures are within spec for "regular" fibre as opposed to "premium" fibre

Signature

Albert Badnitz
P.O. Box 8
Doonside 4135
SOUTH AFRICA

> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Dennis
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.