> It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
> On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
> In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
> experience with this topic?
> Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".
> BTW, there are 4 fibers in a metallic tube with a diameter of 1.42 mm.
>
> Greeting,
>
> Dennis
> > Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Are these the losses obtained from teh OTDR traces
Yes!
> How long are the fibre
Between 400m and 700m.
> > It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
>
> Just curious but how do you check this?
A company met us with a new measuring system. They were able to
check, if the hydrogen peak becomes greater and widen at a specific
wavelength. In my opinion, the were checking at 1385nm the amount of
the hydrogen peak and compared it to fibers with good attenuation.
> > On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
> > In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> with the computed length from OTDR measurements. OTDR measrurmetns will
> of course only be as good as teh known effective index of the fibre.
There are two tubes laying the same way with the same length. Both
tubes
are having the nearly the same excess length. They were delivered by
the
same supplier.
I guess you're right with the index. But in my opinion is the failure,
when we're using
the wrong index, nonserious.
> > Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".
>
> Do they measure the same loss with a laser - power meter test set?
> If you use a single mode laser and under fill the fibre then the loss
> would be less sensitive to microbending
I was not able to measure th loss with a power meter.
Do you mean, that when I'm measuring the MM-fibers with a single mode
laser
at 1330 nm and 1550 nm, I would get a general statement if it's
microbending
or not? What kind of results would I expect?
> cheers
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> > Dennis
DM - 19 Apr 2008 22:09 GMT
>>> Hello,
>>> I have a problem with multimode fibers. The attenuation of the fibers
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Between 400m and 700m.
Fairly short lengths - is teh attentuation an automatic or manual
measurement
I take it the OTDR is using a short pulse length and the measurment
isn't geting corrupted by near end dead zone, ... or tail end of a
Fresnel reflection from connector uniting.
>>> It's no problem with hydrogen. I've checked it.
>> Just curious but how do you check this?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wavelength. In my opinion, the were checking at 1385nm the amount of
> the hydrogen peak and compared it to fibers with good attenuation.
OK that was just a minor confusion, I'd consider this an OH peak.
>>> On my OTDR are no events displayed. The curve is normal.
>>> In my opinion, it looks for micro- or macrobending. Does anyone has
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> when we're using
> the wrong index, nonserious.
You supplier will quote the measureed cable length, not the measured
fibre length- at least that's what I spec., and get when I order cable,
although generally this is single mode fibre.
Do you have a good similar cabled fibre? If so test it, get a decent
figure for effetive index assuming fibre L = cable L, Now use this value
of eff. index with your poor cable.
is the fibre length significantly differnt from cabled length
>>> Is it possible to measure it or to make it "visible".
>> Do they measure the same loss with a laser - power meter test set?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> microbending
> or not? What kind of results would I expect?
if it is micro bending I'd expect higher loss when the modes are all
excited- higher order modes will see higher loss.
If you use a single mode laser and only excite low order modes then they
should not suffer the same micro bending losses.
I'd expect fairly large differences for microbending with single mode
fibres at 1310 and 1550nm, but not necessarily with multi mode fibres.
However as above if it;s micro bending then I'd expect differnces when
launched only low order modes, and exciting all modes. e.g. measuring
loss with a laser and with an LED.
Another point is that most cable manufacturers make on line measurements
of cabled fibre losses with there own OTDR, do they have anytthing to
say on this front?
cheers
David