>A full featured optics design program can be a bit overwhelming for
>amateurs. If you are only interested in designing telescopes try ATMOS
>
>http://web.tiscali.it/ATMOS/
Hi Steve,
The problem with ATMOS is that he is not a professional optical
designer who understands the design issues involved in real optical
design. He is a very nice person, trying to learn how to do things
like PSF, DOTF and GOTF. I admire his energy and his persistance and
he is far more into the "good force" of optical design than the guy
who is into the "dark force" side of it.
EXTRAPOLATE FROM MY EARLIER POSTINGS
Yes, I understand. Optical design programs are only easy after you
know how to use them. When you are a beginner, it is a lot like
reading ancient Greek after everyone who could read it has been dead
about a thousand years.
Please submit a wish list of things to make telescope design easier.
(anyone reading this)
Suppose a relatively inexpensive but powerful optical design program
had in its GUI menu system, dialog boxes which would allow the user to
set up FOV, Aperture and F/# and then at the press of a button, set up
prescriptions and optimize the following telescopes:
Newtonian
Cassagrainian (and all its variations)
Gregorian
Three Mirror Anastigmats (focal and afocal, on axis in aperture,
off-axis in field)
Three Mirror Anastigmats (focal and afocal, off axis in aperture,
off-axis in field)
Reflective Triplets (on and off axis in aperture, off-axis in field)
Offner relays
Schmit Cameras
Schmit Cas.
Refractive Doublets
Cook Triplets
1. What other design forms would be of interest? Iv'e been designing
this stuff for 20 years and could easily automate it in the menu in
ODP.
2. What forms of performace analysis should automatically come out
when the user hits the go button:
MTF?
PSF?
Rim Ray plots?
RIM RAY PLOTES?
Other?
I'd be more than willing to add these capabilities to ODP. It would be
easy.
Please submit ideas either on sci.optics or via email at
westcostengineering.com.
www.westcoastengineering.com
The $49.00 answer to ZEMAX, OSLO, ACOSS-V and everything else except
CODE-V.
Jim Klein
FB - 29 Oct 2004 12:09 GMT
> >A full featured optics design program can be a bit overwhelming for
> >amateurs. If you are only interested in designing telescopes try ATMOS
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> this stuff for 20 years and could easily automate it in the menu in
> ODP.
OpTaliX-LT already does provide this functionality for some basic
telescope forms (Newtonian, Cassegrain, Richey-Chretien, Gregorian,
Refractor doublet) in a full blown GUI. System data like FOV, F/#, focal
length, etc, can be entered in dialog boxes and the program does
the rest. Thus, an inexperienced or occasional user does not need to
know much about all the subtle details of the program. OpTaliX also
composes a default merit function for subsequent optimization, however,
that would require OpTaliX-Pro.
OpTaliX-LT is shareware and is found at http://www.optenso.de/
OpTaliX has been written and is maintained by professional optical designers
with more than 25 years experience in both optical design and software
development.
Finally a few words about the author of ATMOS: I know him personally
and I do admire him for his achievements, even though he is not
involved in professional optical desgin. Also keep in mind that many
great astronomers and designers were amateurs (for example Herschel,
Schupmann, Kutter, to name only a few).
< rest snipped>
Fritz
West Coast Engineering - 29 Oct 2004 21:31 GMT
>> >A full featured optics design program can be a bit overwhelming for
>> >amateurs. If you are only interested in designing telescopes try ATMOS
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
>
>Fritz
West Coast Engineering - 29 Oct 2004 22:37 GMT
I guess what I was intending to ask was for a list of optical design
forms which would be welcomed by the community besides the standard 2
mirror designs and two element refractors.
That said,
When you move on to three element refractors and when you want to
remove secondary or even tertiary color, "pushing the button" becomes
a little inadequate.
A friend once had a rifle sight designed by a consultant, using ZEMAX
but it could have been any other commercial code, who thought he knew
what he was doing but the Schott KZSFN-4 glass, which took out all the
secondary color, was beyond my friends optical shop to handle and when
they cleaned it in ACETONE, it turned brown and lost them a government
contract.
There is a really fuzzy line between those who do optics and those who
do disasters.
Jim Klein