Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Depth of Focus Formula

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
W. Watson - 24 Feb 2005 03:11 GMT
I'm looking at a formula for depth of focus on a web site, and it shows equation
depth->subscript of(diffraction) is equal to the 1.22*wavelength divided by the
sine squared of a half angle (Where the sine argumentis the half angle subtended
by the lens as seen from either the object or image plane). Anyone know where
the formula came from? Perhaps someone of historic merit derived it? Where can I
find a description or reference to it?
Signature

             Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)
                 (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
                  Obz Site:  39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
             Do you need 204,300 calories a day? A humming bird weighing
        170 pounds would. scientific note on social behavior of a rufus: None

                        Web Page: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews>

JK (at mail dot dk) - 25 Feb 2005 13:10 GMT
>I'm looking at a formula for depth of focus on a web site, and it shows equation
>depth->subscript of(diffraction) is equal to the 1.22*wavelength divided by the
>sine squared of a half angle (Where the sine argumentis the half angle subtended
>by the lens as seen from either the object or image plane). Anyone know where
>the formula came from? Perhaps someone of historic merit derived it? Where can I
>find a description or reference to it?

I don't remember exactly why it was derived so. But you must know that
diffraction formula and depth of focus are related.
I mean the formula for diffraction limited resolution.

Certainly we know that when we stop down the aperture in a lens the
depth of focus increases. Stop 8 - 11 gives large depth and stop 2.8
gives small depth.

So:

big aperture --> high resolution (when diffraction limited) and low
depth of focus

small aperture --> lower resolution but larger depth of focus.

It is also logical from a ray-tracing point of view, that when rays
comes to the image plane from a larger cone angle the focus will be
well defined over a shorter distance only.

Look in Born & Wolf or Jenkins & White to put some optics bibles
loosely.

best regards

John
W. Watson - 25 Feb 2005 15:49 GMT
>>I'm looking at a formula for depth of focus on a web site, and it shows equation
>>depth->subscript of(diffraction) is equal to the 1.22*wavelength divided by the
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> John

Unfortunately, I do not have access to those books. If you could scan a relevant
page from one, and send it to me at sierra_mtnview A-T earthlink.net that would
be appreciated. The only advanced book on optics I have is by Hecht. Maybe I
should invest in Bor and Wolf as another reference. I'll look on Amazon or
Powell. I hope optics is in the title.

Signature

             Wayne T. Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA)
                 (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
                  Obz Site:  39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
             Do you need 204,300 calories a day? A humming bird weighing
         170 pounds would. Scientific note on a rufus's social behavior: None

                        Web Page: <home.earthlink.net/~mtnviews>

Johannes Swartling - 25 Feb 2005 17:24 GMT
> I'm looking at a formula for depth of focus on a web site, and it shows
> equation depth->subscript of(diffraction) is equal to the 1.22*wavelength
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> historic merit derived it? Where can I find a description or reference to
> it?

sine squared of half angle = NA squared, which is how you usually see it
written. Depth of field is obviously a somewhat arbitrary quantity and you
see different variations on the formula for it depending on the preferences
of the person who came up with it. These equations are used for high NA
microscope objectives. For low NA microscope objectives and for photography
the depth of field is normally defined using geometrical optics, based on
the circle of confusion.

Johannes
West Coast Engineering - 26 Feb 2005 00:17 GMT
It came from a derivation by Conrady in Applied Optics Vol. 1.

It was available from Dover. There is a Vol II edited by his
son-in-law, Dr Kingslake.

The equation is also in Optical Engineering by Waren Smith.

It represents the amount of defocus before two point sources can no
longer be resolved as individual sources and begin to look like one
source, in the absence of aberrations other than defocus. This is
based upon the assumption of diffraction blur due to circular
apertures.

Sincerely,

Jim Klein
www.westcosastengineering.com

Check us out. We provide the only full featured optical design program
which includes both friendly user support and full program source
code.

User support and program updates $49.00

Source code $10.00/year.

We are not the equivalent of CODE-V which is the best optical design
program in the world and which provides the best user support and
engineering services of any company on the planet, but our user
support does not consist of a nasty person telling you to "look it up
in the reference manual" as the ZEMIN people do and we are willing to
"teach you some optics" because we started with the intent to make
optics and optical design available to the world of "regular" people.

We don't like ZEMIN. We don't like it's autor. He was rude to us once,
before ODP was anything more than an personal optical analysis tool
and we DO NOT LIKE THE RUDE.

If you need a really great optical design code or optical engineering
services to support your project,

Call Optical Research Associates

Pasadena, CA
1-626-795-9101.

If you need a cheaper optical design tool, we will try to treat you as
well as ORA would treat you, withing the limits of our resourcses.
email us at westcoastengineering@westcoastengineering.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.