Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question from a optics illiterate.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 00:33 GMT
I picked up a CCD camera years ago as part of a lot that I bid on. It
was owned by the National Research Council of Canada. It has no optics
but camera is functional as a microscope with a lens placed just ahead
of the CCD chip. The lens mounting thread is about 26 MM with an
exceptionally fine thread ( maybe 40 TPI) The body is marked with the GE
Logo  and the name CIDTEC and I think the mod number is CID1710. (I
looked on the CIDTEC site but could not find any info on the 1710.

In any case if I could, I would like to see if I could get it working as
a surveillance camera for my shop and or our entrance.

I was considering hauling the optics out of one of the old unused 35 mm
cameras or binoculars if you thought those optics might be compatible.
Failing that I would consider looking for something on Ebay if I knew
what to look for.

Any and all comments would be most appreciated.

Thanks Bill
Do Litlle Jr. - 25 Feb 2005 01:17 GMT
[snip....]

> In any case if I could, I would like to see if I could get it working as
> a surveillance camera for my shop and or our entrance.

It might not be worse the trouble.
One can buy wireless 2.4 Ghz cameras very cheap.
For instance, this site offers 3 wireless cameras for $109.00

http://www.x10.com/onsale/index.html
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 02:19 GMT
> [snip....]
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://www.x10.com/onsale/index.html

Thanks Jr ..... That's quite a sale. Actually I am more interested in
tinkering then in just buying one, but I do thank you for the great
steer.

Bill
Sam Goldwasser - 25 Feb 2005 02:57 GMT
> > [snip....]
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> tinkering then in just buying one, but I do thank you for the great
> steer.

As others have noted, this is probably a C-mount lens.  You should be able
to find them inexpensively on eBay.  As also noted, 35 mm lens adapters
are available but keep in mind that the field of view for the image sensor
will be a small fraction of the field of view for the 35 mm lens, so a
"normal" 35 mm lens turns into a long telephoto on your camera.

--- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ 
Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ 
+Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm 
       | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html

Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive
traffic on Repairfaq.org.

Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is
ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line.  Or, you can
contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs.
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 03:41 GMT
"Sam Goldwasser" <sam@saul.cis.upenn.edu> wrote in message >

> As others have noted, this is probably a C-mount lens.  You should be
> able
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> will be a small fraction of the field of view for the 35 mm lens, so a
> "normal" 35 mm lens turns into a long telephoto on your camera.

Thanks Sam

The sensor is ~8 mm wide and ~6 mm tall and the measured minor diameter
of the mount was 0.967" which is bang on for a 1-32 thread.

Thanks for the info!
Bill

> --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror:
> http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> can
> contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs.
Leonard Migliore - 25 Feb 2005 01:18 GMT
> I picked up a CCD camera years ago as part of a lot that I bid on. It
> was owned by the National Research Council of Canada. It has no optics
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks Bill

Could it be a 3710? That's a Cidtec model. Could the thread be 1"-32?
That's C-mount. You can get C-mount adapters to a lot of 35mm mounts,
certainly Nikon.

And technically, it's not a CCD camera but a CID camera. If it's a 1710,
though, it will hook up to a standard video monitor.
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 03:12 GMT
>> I picked up a CCD camera years ago as part of a lot that I bid on. It
>> was owned by the National Research Council of Canada. It has no
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> 1710,
> though, it will hook up to a standard video monitor.

Thanks Leonard!

   It positively is a 1710 as it is clearly marked with no mistake. You
are probably right on the size. I did not bother use my digital
callipers because all I could get was the ID of the thread so I
estimated where the root of the thread was and measured with a kids
drafting scale.  The thread was just guessed.(BUT I just now rubbed a
piece of paper back and forth around the thread and measured the
impression and I got 8 lines to a 1/4 " so it is a 32 TPI thread.)

The camera does work to my new Sony Wega via the yellow RCA video jack
on the front.
I spotted this lens and a few others in Ebay with a search using "lens
and C mount" .

Is this the type lens that I need or can you suggest something better.
( a little fun)

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=297&item=3876674817&rd=1&
ssPageName=WDVW

or
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=21165&item=3875757697&rd=
1&ssPageName=WDVW


Thanks much!!!!
Bill
Leonard Migliore - 25 Feb 2005 03:58 GMT
> >> I picked up a CCD camera years ago as part of a lot that I bid on. It
> >> was owned by the National Research Council of Canada. It has no
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
> Thanks much!!!!
> Bill

As others have noted, there are a lot of C-mount lenses and many of them
are inexpensive. Any of them should work. The only issue is that your
camera may have a "CS" mount which is the same thread only closer to the
sensor. CS mounts tend to be found on very small (like 1" cube) cameras.
If your camera is bigger, like 4"X2"X2", it almost certainly has a
regular C-mount. C-mount lenses will fit a CS mount camera but they
won't focus without a spacer.
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 10:22 GMT
"Leonard Migliore" <ora@laserk.com> wrote in message news:ora->
> As others have noted, there are a lot of C-mount lenses and many of
> them
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> regular C-mount. C-mount lenses will fit a CS mount camera but they
> won't focus without a spacer.

Thanks again Leonard!

   This camera is about 3"X3"X5". (Not small) There is a Normal, X2,
and X4 switch (presumably an electronic magnification) and a "Focus
cable connector" and a 25 pin ?? computer connector. I assume that the
focus connection physically moves the  CID chip for and aft. I cannot
imagine how else it could work.

OK, I am sure it must be just a C-mount then.

Thanks
Bill
Bob May - 26 Feb 2005 01:30 GMT
On the better cameras, there is an adjustment to allow for the minor
differences between lenses to be compensated for.  It will move the sensor a
little ways in/out.  Unless you find that the lens that you get doesn't
focus quite right (you can focus past infinity or never get quite there)
then you may adjust this control.
CS mounts are a fairly new version of the C mount and I'd suspect that you
don't have them.  If, by chance, you do actually have a CS mount, there is
an adapter ring that very nicely adapts between the two focal points.
I'll note that a 25mm lens is pretty much the "standard" focal length, kind
of like 50mm for 35mm cameras.

--
Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole?
Bill Darby - 26 Feb 2005 08:15 GMT
> On the better cameras, there is an adjustment to allow for the minor
> differences between lenses to be compensated for.  It will move the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> --
> Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole?

Thanks Bob!!!
redbelly - 25 Feb 2005 12:10 GMT
Hello Bill,

When choosing a lens, also keep in mind the sensor size.  Try to get a
lens made for the same size.  If the lens is made for larger sensors
than the one you have, it will still work but: 1. you are probably
spending more than you need on the lens, and 2. it is acting like a
larger telephoto lens as Sam said.  If the lens is made for a smaller
sensor, then the image will be clipped and you definately don't want
that.

Typical sensor sizes are 1/3", 1/2", and 2/3".  But nothing on the
sensor actually matches that size!  If you measure the sensor diagonal,
you can determine the size:

Diagonal     Size
6 mm           1/3"
8 mm           1/2"
11 mm         2/3"

A more complete chart covering many sizes is at:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0210/02100402sensorsizes.asp

Mark
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 15:47 GMT
> Hello Bill,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Mark

Hi Mark

OK I get the gist of what you mean. I re measured my sensor and it's
near as damit to 9 mm by 7 mm which gives me about an 11 mm diagonal so
I should be looking for a 2/3" which translates to a 16.933 mm diameter.
And from the chart I find these two examples of lenses that would be a
match:

Camera                     Sensor Type     Pixel count          Sensor
size

Sony DSC-F717             2/3"         CCD 5.2 million       8.8 x 6.6
mm
Minolta DiMAGE 7Hi    2/3"         CCD 5.2 million        8.8 x 6.6 mm

Ok Mark I think I am beginning to understand what it is that I need.

Tks
Bill
Leonard Migliore - 25 Feb 2005 18:43 GMT
In article <NMHTd.50175$Am3.1559703@news20.bellglobal.com>,

> OK I get the gist of what you mean. I re measured my sensor and it's
> near as damit to 9 mm by 7 mm which gives me about an 11 mm diagonal so
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> mm
> Minolta DiMAGE 7Hi    2/3"         CCD 5.2 million        8.8 x 6.6 mm

No, those are whole cameras which happen to have 2/3" sensors and you
can't easily take the lenses out of them. An example of loose lenses
that you can put on your camera is here:

http://www.edmundoptics.com/onlinecatalog/displayproduct.cfm?productID=12
75

Again, the world is rife with C-mount lenses and they are available at
low cost from many sources. You just have to decide what field of view
you need and then pick an appropriate focal length. For a 2.3" sensor, a
12mm focal length will give you a horizontal field angle around 40
degrees, which is considered a "normal" perspective. Shorter or longer
focal lengths will alter the field angle for wide angle or telephoto use.
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 20:36 GMT
> In article <NMHTd.50175$Am3.1559703@news20.bellglobal.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> focal lengths will alter the field angle for wide angle or telephoto
> use.

Thanks Leonard

   This is the what I needed. I think now that I should be able to
judge if a given Ebay lens will suit my camera or not.

Cheers
Bill
Michael - 25 Feb 2005 15:30 GMT
Your camera uses either C or CS mount lenses.  The difference between the
two is the backfocal length; a Cmount lens has 17.5mm back focus, while CS
is 12.5mm.  The distance is measured from the face of the mounting flange to
the imaging plane of the CCD

One good place to buy lenses for it would be www.supercircuits.com .  You
should be able to pick something up for about $20

> I picked up a CCD camera years ago as part of a lot that I bid on. It
> was owned by the National Research Council of Canada. It has no optics
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Thanks Bill
Bill Darby - 25 Feb 2005 15:54 GMT
> Your camera uses either C or CS mount lenses.  The difference between
> the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> You
> should be able to pick something up for about $20

Thanks Michael

   I measured the distance and got 16.1 mm between the face of the
mount and the face of the protective glass so that means it is a
C-mount.  (You live and learn!)

Will take a look at the site you provided!!

Thanks Bill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.