Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Optics / April 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

scattering vs. absorption

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
saburq@gmail.com - 24 Apr 2005 12:28 GMT
A question:

Don't understand why the Absorption ocurrus at Higher wavelengths (4mm
-
20mm) while the scattering influences largely the shorter wavelengths?

Any idears?
regards.
Rene Tschaggelar - 24 Apr 2005 17:05 GMT
> A question:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Any idears?
> regards.

Assuming you're talking about normal infrared 4 to 20um,
and perhaps longer distances in air.

The absorbtion there is due to chemical componds and other
components in the air.
Scattering is done by particles much smaller than the
wavelength.

This is purely coincidence. If the scattering particles were
bigger, the air would not be transparent anymore, perhaps
such as in a cloud. If you have substances in the air that
absorb at shorter wavelength, you'd call that coloring the air,
such as dye or soot.

Rene
Signature

Ing.Buero R.Tschaggelar - http://www.ibrtses.com
& commercial newsgroups - http://www.talkto.net

Misterbeets - 25 Apr 2005 00:23 GMT
In a gas I think they're the same thing. Otherwise the former is
determined by the energy levels of the outer electrons, the latter by
the scatterer dimensions.
Pieter Kuiper - 30 Apr 2005 11:11 GMT
> Don't understand why the Absorption ocurrus at Higher wavelengths
> (4mm - 20mm) while the scattering influences largely the shorter
> wavelengths?

If you know complex numbers, the explanation is that the scattering is
due to the real part of the dielectric constant, and the absorption to
the imaginary part. The are related by Kramers-Kronig transforms.

This is a mathematical representation of the behavior of driven
oscillators: the absorption (dissipation) is due to the response that is
in phase with the driving field, the scattering is due to the component
of the motion that is 90 degrees out of phase with the driving field.

Something about the Lorentz oscillator:
http://webphysics.davidson.edu/Projects/AnAntonelli/node5.html

Signature

"Electrons damage the brain," said Farish.                (Donna Tartt)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.