Neat article on beating the diffraction limit:
http://optics.org/articles/news/11/4/17/1?rss=2.0
I guess the "negative refractive index" refers to phase, and not group,
velocity. More info: N. Fang et al., Science vol. 308, p. 534 (22 Apr.
2005).
Mark
Fred Chen - 30 Apr 2005 02:41 GMT
According to their paper, it should be the real part of permittivity
that is negative, e.g., silver. The evanescent waves are still
evanescent so they decayed quickly going into the photoresist, which
was in direct contact with the superlens.
The diffraction limit is normally about the finite size or aperture of
the lens, as indicated by NA. But in near-field contact imaging, this
does not come into play.
Fred