Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Article: Northwest Passage - Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 01 Dec 2007 06:39 GMT
Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show
Brian Vastag

A single population of prehistoric Siberians crossed the Bering Strait into Alaska and subsequently fanned out to populate North and South America, according to a new genetic analysis of present-day indigenous Americans.

The study also hints that early Americans reached Central and South America by migrating down the Pacific coast by land or sea and only later spread into the interior of South America.

"We have good evidence that a single migration [from Siberia] contributed a large fraction of the ancestry of the Americas," says population geneticist Noah Rosenberg of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, who led the large international study team.

The finding draws on the largest database of Native American genetics ever compiled. The data include DNA from nearly 500 people belonging to 29 groups scattered across Canada, Mexico, Central America, and South America. The researchers also studied samples from 14 Tundra Nentsi individuals living in eastern Siberia.

"They should be commended for bringing together an enormous database, something no one has done before," says Tom Dillehay, an archaeologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.

The team examined 678 genetic markers in the human genome and found that one of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra Nentsi. The marker, moreover, is found nowhere else in the world. "It's extremely difficult to explain this kind of pattern unless all of the Native American populations ... have a large degree of shared ancestry," says Rosenberg.

In addition, the Canadian groups share more genes with the Siberians than do the groups in Central and South America, Rosenberg and his team report online in the November PLoS Genetics.

Tracing further migration through the Americas, the team then correlated genetic variations among different tribes with each group's location as measured along inland or coastal routes. The genetic data suggest that most migration to Central and South America followed the coast.

"That's the easy way south," says Vance Holliday, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson. He cautions, however, that the groups that populated the South American interior would have had to surmount the formidable Andes Mountains.

Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model.

Rosenberg says that a second paper will soon address the genetics of tribes in the United States and whether there was more than one major Siberian migration.

While the study points to an eastern Siberian origin for most of the genes that spread across the Americas, it can't rule out small genetic contributions from other groups, says Kari Britt Schroeder of the University of California, Davis. In 2001, scientists unearthed 8,000- to 11,000-year-old skulls in Brazil that strikingly resemble today's Australian aborigines (SN: 4/7/01, p. 212). The find fueled speculation that several waves of immigrants from different parts of Asia reached the Americas.

"Even if Native Americans share a lot of ancestry from a single origin, there still could be contributions from other groups," says Schroeder.

Source: ScienceNews
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20071201/fob2.asp

Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
arne97 - 01 Dec 2007 23:29 GMT
It will be interesting to see the incorporation of USA and Brazil
data.
                                Arne
Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 08:57 GMT
>    It will be interesting to see the incorporation of USA and Brazil
> data.
>                                  Arne

Or USA and Costa Rica and Peru and Lithuania for that matter.
Paul Ciszek - 02 Dec 2007 22:35 GMT
>Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that
>southward migration along interior routes should still be considered.
>Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the
>United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that
>might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model.

That sounds like a pretty serious omission, since the first inhabitants
of South America would have to have passed *through* the territory that
is now the United States.

Signature

Please reply to:            | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com    |  connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled       |            -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006

Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 09:00 GMT
> >Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that
> >southward migration along interior routes should still be considered.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> of South America would have to have passed *through* the territory that
> is now the United States.

Last time I checked the Pacific Coast between Canada and
So Amerika was the United States or have they changed that?
He's talking about "the INTERIOR" of the US and SAmerica.
I thought that was clear as a vampire on a moron?

> --
> Please reply to:            | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
> pciszek at panix dot com    |  connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
> Autoreply is disabled       |            -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
Paul Ciszek - 12 Dec 2007 05:31 GMT
>> >Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that
>> >southward migration along interior routes should still be considered.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>He's talking about "the INTERIOR" of the US and SAmerica.
>I thought that was clear as a vampire on a moron?

Whether they came down the Pacific coast of what is now the US, or
throught he interior of what is now the US, the sudy is missing any
data from what is now the US.  A significant portion of the route has
been omitted.

Signature

Please reply to:            | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com    |  connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled       |            -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006

Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 08:56 GMT
very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even
comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night).
Nice work. Thanks.

> Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show
>
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
> Posted by
> Robert Karl Stonjek
Thomas T. Veldhouse - 06 Dec 2007 18:44 GMT
In sci.bio.paleontology Morganba <nicolata@piccolo.org> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: us-ascii, 86 lines --]
>
> very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even
> comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night).
> Nice work. Thanks.

Excellent ... but was a full repost necessary for that comment?

Signature

Thomas T. Veldhouse

 People tend to make rules for others and exceptions for themselves.

deowll - 21 Dec 2007 00:00 GMT
very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even
comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night).
Nice work. Thanks.

Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show
Brian Vastag
A single population of prehistoric Siberians crossed the Bering Strait into
Alaska and subsequently fanned out to populate North and South America,
according to a new genetic analysis of present-day indigenous Americans.
The study also hints that early Americans reached Central and South America
by migrating down the Pacific coast by land or sea and only later spread
into the interior of South America.
"We have good evidence that a single migration [from Siberia] contributed a
large fraction of the ancestry of the Americas," says population geneticist
Noah Rosenberg of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, who led the large
international study team.
The finding draws on the largest database of Native American genetics ever
compiled. The data include DNA from nearly 500 people belonging to 29 groups
scattered across Canada, Mexico, Central America, and South America. The
researchers also studied samples from 14 Tundra Nentsi individuals living in
eastern Siberia.
"They should be commended for bringing together an enormous database,
something no one has done before," says Tom Dillehay, an archaeologist at
Vanderbilt University in Nashville.
The team examined 678 genetic markers in the human genome and found that one
of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra Nentsi. The
marker, moreover, is found nowhere else in the world. "It's extremely
difficult to explain this kind of pattern unless all of the Native American
populations ... have a large degree of shared ancestry," says Rosenberg.
In addition, the Canadian groups share more genes with the Siberians than do
the groups in Central and South America, Rosenberg and his team report
online in the November PLoS Genetics.
Tracing further migration through the Americas, the team then correlated
genetic variations among different tribes with each group's location as
measured along inland or coastal routes. The genetic data suggest that most
migration to Central and South America followed the coast.
"That's the easy way south," says Vance Holliday, an archaeologist at the
University of Arizona in Tucson. He cautions, however, that the groups that
populated the South American interior would have had to surmount the
formidable Andes Mountains.
Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that
southward migration along interior routes should still be considered.
Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the
United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that
might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model.
Rosenberg says that a second paper will soon address the genetics of tribes
in the United States and whether there was more than one major Siberian
migration.
While the study points to an eastern Siberian origin for most of the genes
that spread across the Americas, it can't rule out small genetic
contributions from other groups, says Kari Britt Schroeder of the University
of California, Davis. In 2001, scientists unearthed 8,000- to
11,000-year-old skulls in Brazil that strikingly resemble today's Australian
aborigines (SN: 4/7/01, p. 212). The find fueled speculation that several
waves of immigrants from different parts of Asia reached the Americas.
"Even if Native Americans share a lot of ancestry from a single origin,
there still could be contributions from other groups," says Schroeder.
Source: ScienceNews
http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20071201/fob2.asp
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

***********************************************************************************
I changed the format

So all living Americans share some ancestors.  This has to be true because
the all share one marker. That does not prove they all came to the America's
in the same wave or that some aren't hauling around genes from some groups
that aren't represented in other individuals. Now if they all shared several
dozen markers....It still wouldn't tell us much about the dead.
G Horvat - 21 Dec 2007 21:32 GMT
>So all living Americans share some ancestors.  This has to be true because
>the all share one marker.

What was determined in the study was that the marker was present in
all the populations tested.  Only about 1/3 of the specific
individuals in those populations had the marker.   Place emphasis on
the word "group" in the following:

"one of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra
Nentsi..."

There is also an error in the above statement.  The Asian population
which had the marker was not the Tundra  Nentsi as written above but a
few populations closer to the Bering Strait i.e. Chukchi.  This was
determined in a previous study and that's what confused the reporter.

Similar information is interpreted, in Y chromosome and mtDNA studies,
as indicative of back-migration to Asia.

Gisele
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.