Article: Northwest Passage - Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Robert Karl Stonjek - 01 Dec 2007 06:39 GMT Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show Brian Vastag
A single population of prehistoric Siberians crossed the Bering Strait into Alaska and subsequently fanned out to populate North and South America, according to a new genetic analysis of present-day indigenous Americans.
The study also hints that early Americans reached Central and South America by migrating down the Pacific coast by land or sea and only later spread into the interior of South America.
"We have good evidence that a single migration [from Siberia] contributed a large fraction of the ancestry of the Americas," says population geneticist Noah Rosenberg of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, who led the large international study team.
The finding draws on the largest database of Native American genetics ever compiled. The data include DNA from nearly 500 people belonging to 29 groups scattered across Canada, Mexico, Central America, and South America. The researchers also studied samples from 14 Tundra Nentsi individuals living in eastern Siberia.
"They should be commended for bringing together an enormous database, something no one has done before," says Tom Dillehay, an archaeologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville.
The team examined 678 genetic markers in the human genome and found that one of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra Nentsi. The marker, moreover, is found nowhere else in the world. "It's extremely difficult to explain this kind of pattern unless all of the Native American populations ... have a large degree of shared ancestry," says Rosenberg.
In addition, the Canadian groups share more genes with the Siberians than do the groups in Central and South America, Rosenberg and his team report online in the November PLoS Genetics.
Tracing further migration through the Americas, the team then correlated genetic variations among different tribes with each group's location as measured along inland or coastal routes. The genetic data suggest that most migration to Central and South America followed the coast.
"That's the easy way south," says Vance Holliday, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson. He cautions, however, that the groups that populated the South American interior would have had to surmount the formidable Andes Mountains.
Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model.
Rosenberg says that a second paper will soon address the genetics of tribes in the United States and whether there was more than one major Siberian migration.
While the study points to an eastern Siberian origin for most of the genes that spread across the Americas, it can't rule out small genetic contributions from other groups, says Kari Britt Schroeder of the University of California, Davis. In 2001, scientists unearthed 8,000- to 11,000-year-old skulls in Brazil that strikingly resemble today's Australian aborigines (SN: 4/7/01, p. 212). The find fueled speculation that several waves of immigrants from different parts of Asia reached the Americas.
"Even if Native Americans share a lot of ancestry from a single origin, there still could be contributions from other groups," says Schroeder.
Source: ScienceNews http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20071201/fob2.asp
Posted by Robert Karl Stonjek
arne97 - 01 Dec 2007 23:29 GMT It will be interesting to see the incorporation of USA and Brazil data. Arne
Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 08:57 GMT > It will be interesting to see the incorporation of USA and Brazil > data. > Arne Or USA and Costa Rica and Peru and Lithuania for that matter.
Paul Ciszek - 02 Dec 2007 22:35 GMT >Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that >southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. >Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the >United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that >might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model. That sounds like a pretty serious omission, since the first inhabitants of South America would have to have passed *through* the territory that is now the United States.
 Signature Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror." Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 09:00 GMT > >Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that > >southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > of South America would have to have passed *through* the territory that > is now the United States. Last time I checked the Pacific Coast between Canada and So Amerika was the United States or have they changed that? He's talking about "the INTERIOR" of the US and SAmerica. I thought that was clear as a vampire on a moron?
> -- > Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to > pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror." > Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006 Paul Ciszek - 12 Dec 2007 05:31 GMT >> >Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that >> >southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >He's talking about "the INTERIOR" of the US and SAmerica. >I thought that was clear as a vampire on a moron? Whether they came down the Pacific coast of what is now the US, or throught he interior of what is now the US, the sudy is missing any data from what is now the US. A significant portion of the route has been omitted.
 Signature Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror." Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
Morganba - 06 Dec 2007 08:56 GMT very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night). Nice work. Thanks.
> Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show > [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > Posted by > Robert Karl Stonjek Thomas T. Veldhouse - 06 Dec 2007 18:44 GMT In sci.bio.paleontology Morganba <nicolata@piccolo.org> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 7bit, charset: us-ascii, 86 lines --] > > very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even > comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night). > Nice work. Thanks. Excellent ... but was a full repost necessary for that comment?
 Signature Thomas T. Veldhouse
People tend to make rules for others and exceptions for themselves.
deowll - 21 Dec 2007 00:00 GMT very nice post! ... and Verhenhaegenboggendoggan didnt even comment. There is a God! (or he's in a padded cell for the night). Nice work. Thanks.
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote: Northwest Passage: Americas populated via Alaska, genetics show Brian Vastag A single population of prehistoric Siberians crossed the Bering Strait into Alaska and subsequently fanned out to populate North and South America, according to a new genetic analysis of present-day indigenous Americans. The study also hints that early Americans reached Central and South America by migrating down the Pacific coast by land or sea and only later spread into the interior of South America. "We have good evidence that a single migration [from Siberia] contributed a large fraction of the ancestry of the Americas," says population geneticist Noah Rosenberg of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, who led the large international study team. The finding draws on the largest database of Native American genetics ever compiled. The data include DNA from nearly 500 people belonging to 29 groups scattered across Canada, Mexico, Central America, and South America. The researchers also studied samples from 14 Tundra Nentsi individuals living in eastern Siberia. "They should be commended for bringing together an enormous database, something no one has done before," says Tom Dillehay, an archaeologist at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. The team examined 678 genetic markers in the human genome and found that one of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra Nentsi. The marker, moreover, is found nowhere else in the world. "It's extremely difficult to explain this kind of pattern unless all of the Native American populations ... have a large degree of shared ancestry," says Rosenberg. In addition, the Canadian groups share more genes with the Siberians than do the groups in Central and South America, Rosenberg and his team report online in the November PLoS Genetics. Tracing further migration through the Americas, the team then correlated genetic variations among different tribes with each group's location as measured along inland or coastal routes. The genetic data suggest that most migration to Central and South America followed the coast. "That's the easy way south," says Vance Holliday, an archaeologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson. He cautions, however, that the groups that populated the South American interior would have had to surmount the formidable Andes Mountains. Despite the migration findings, Holliday and Dillehay both say that southward migration along interior routes should still be considered. Dillehay notes that the current study excludes Native Americans from the United States and eastern Brazil. "It's a sampling bias," he says, that might have erroneously favored the Pacific coast migration model. Rosenberg says that a second paper will soon address the genetics of tribes in the United States and whether there was more than one major Siberian migration. While the study points to an eastern Siberian origin for most of the genes that spread across the Americas, it can't rule out small genetic contributions from other groups, says Kari Britt Schroeder of the University of California, Davis. In 2001, scientists unearthed 8,000- to 11,000-year-old skulls in Brazil that strikingly resemble today's Australian aborigines (SN: 4/7/01, p. 212). The find fueled speculation that several waves of immigrants from different parts of Asia reached the Americas. "Even if Native Americans share a lot of ancestry from a single origin, there still could be contributions from other groups," says Schroeder. Source: ScienceNews http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20071201/fob2.asp Posted by Robert Karl Stonjek
*********************************************************************************** I changed the format
So all living Americans share some ancestors. This has to be true because the all share one marker. That does not prove they all came to the America's in the same wave or that some aren't hauling around genes from some groups that aren't represented in other individuals. Now if they all shared several dozen markers....It still wouldn't tell us much about the dead.
G Horvat - 21 Dec 2007 21:32 GMT >So all living Americans share some ancestors. This has to be true because >the all share one marker. What was determined in the study was that the marker was present in all the populations tested. Only about 1/3 of the specific individuals in those populations had the marker. Place emphasis on the word "group" in the following:
"one of the markers ties every Native American group to the Tundra Nentsi..."
There is also an error in the above statement. The Asian population which had the marker was not the Tundra Nentsi as written above but a few populations closer to the Bering Strait i.e. Chukchi. This was determined in a previous study and that's what confused the reporter.
Similar information is interpreted, in Y chromosome and mtDNA studies, as indicative of back-migration to Asia.
Gisele
|
|
|