I'm wondering if anyone on this newsgroup can help me to identify the
below fossil, which I found on the surface in south Louisiana:
http://www.fotothing.com/photos/fc6/fc6f4df57c46e3a6b7950f8d5e582172.jpg?ts=1201
617265
The reverse side is shown here:
http://www.fotothing.com/photos/d44/d44eb407199f1607bce56dc0d78d0051.jpg?ts=1201
617798
I at first thought it was a crinoid, but I find it's too large to
correspond to most descriptions of crinoids.
Could it be coral?
Thanks,
Feles
John Harshman - 30 Jan 2008 02:38 GMT
> I'm wondering if anyone on this newsgroup can help me to identify the
> below fossil, which I found on the surface in south Louisiana:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Could it be coral?
If indeed it's a fossil, which is not clear to me from the photos, it's
too worn for me to have any real idea what it could have looked like
when fresh. But it's too big to be a crinoid stem.
Andy - 03 Feb 2008 03:21 GMT
> I'm wondering if anyone on this newsgroup can help me to identify the
> below fossil, which I found on the surface in south Louisiana:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Feles
It is quite worn. And it's hard to tell from the pictures. But it
could be an echinoid. It's very hard to say with certainty.
Andy
fancyui - 07 Feb 2008 07:51 GMT
> > I'm wondering if anyone on this newsgroup can help me to identify the
> > below fossil, which I found on the surface in south Louisiana:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
could it be a fruit?