A journal editor rejected my article because it does not show
branching blood vessels, although it does show many straight blood
vessel remains SEM at 4,000X to 32,000X.
I cannot believe myself that there is such an editor with a
paleontological journal
who needs to see a blood vessel branch to believe it was a blood
vessel remains.
Anyway, in case you are such a person, here are the beautiful
branching blood vessel remains of human tissue that endures millions
of generation. In the third photo below, they look just like fireworks
in the night sky. In the fourth photo, the red blood cell remains were
preserved just like new ones. The preservation techniques of the
Carboniferous men surpass those of modern men, demonstrating their
high level of civilization.
Links to photos of branching blood vessels remains photographed with
4x, 10X, 40X, and 100X object lens respectively:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634514&p=0
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634513&p=1
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634512&p=2
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634512&p=2
Lin Liangtai - 17 Feb 2008 14:31 GMT
> A journal editor rejected my article because it does not show
> branching blood vessels, although it does show many straight blood
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634512&p=2
Sorry, the correct link to the 4th photo is here:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634515&p=3