Domestication of the donkey
An international group of researchers has found evidence for the earliest transport use of the donkey and the early phases of donkey domestication, suggesting the process of domestication may have been slower and less linear than previously thought.
Based on a study of 10 donkey skeletons from three graves dedicated to donkeys in the funerary complex of one of the first Pharaoh's at Abydos, Egypt, the team, led by Fiona Marshall, Ph.D., professor of Anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis, and Stine Rossel of the University of Copenhagen, found that donkeys around 5,000 years ago were in an early phase of domestication. They looked like wild animals but displayed joint wear that showed that they were used as domestic animals.
"Genetic research has suggested African origins for the donkey," said Marshall. "But coming up with an exact time and location for domestication is difficult because signs of early domestication can be hard to see. Our findings show that traces of human management can indicate domestication before skeletal or even genetic changes."
The previously unpublished research was presented in "Domestication of the Donkey: New Data on Timing, Process and Indicators" in the March 10 online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Domestication of the donkey from the African wild a.s was a pivotal point in human history. It transformed ancient transport systems in Africa and Asia and the organization of early cities and pastoral societies.
The research team examined the 5,000-year-old Abydos skeletons along with 53 modern donkey and African wild a.s skeletons. Analysis showed that the Abydos metacarpals were similar in overall proportions to those of wild a.s, but individual measurements varied. Mid-shaft breadths resembled wild a.s, but mid-shaft depths and distal breadths were intermediate between wild a.s and domestic donkey.
Despite this, all the Abydos skeletons exhibited a range of wear and other pathologies on their bones consistent with load carrying. Morphological similarities to wild a.s show that despite their use as beasts of burden, donkeys were still undergoing considerable phenotypic change during the early dynastic period in Egypt. This pattern is consistent with recent studies of other domestic animals that suggest that the process of domestication is slower and more complicated than had been previously thought.
Source: Washington University in St. Louis
http://www.physorg.com/news124388258.html

Signature
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
Larry Caldwell - 14 Mar 2008 04:20 GMT
> Domestication of the donkey
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Source: Washington University in St. Louis
> http://www.physorg.com/news124388258.html
This is an advertisement for interdisciplinary studies. The Agriculture
Department could have given the archeologists this information 40 years
ago. The origin of food crops and domestic animals has been the object
of intensive research since the last quarter of the 19th century. The
development of domestic animals in Africa was as slow and painful as the
development of domestic cereal crops in Asia Minor. While origins are
hard to discover, both revolutions were well under way by the late
neolithic. 5000 years ago is quite conservative as a date for
domestication of the African a.s, since war chariots were in use in
Sumeria before that.
Intermediate forms between wild and domestic a.ses were probably due to
an ignorance of selective breeding and the capture of wild breeding
stock to increase the herd size.

Signature
For email, replace firstnamelastinitial
with my first name and last initial.