Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

News: Scientists say pyramids could be concrete

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 24 Apr 2008 05:27 GMT
Scientists say pyramids could be concrete

Scientists are taking a new look at Egypt's pyramids to see if some of the blocks could have been made from concrete.

Linn W. Hobbs, a materials science professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told The Boston Globe there is a chance ancient Egyptians could have cast the blocks from synthetic material instead of carving them from quarries. Scientists have long believed Romans were the first to use structural concrete.

Undergraduates in MIT's Materials in Human Experience class are building a scale-model pyramid made of quarried limestone and blocks cast from crushed limestone sludge fortified with clay, silica and natural desert salts.

Archaeologists say there is no evidence the pyramids are built of any synthetic material, the newspaper said. Hobbs said the concrete theory, advanced in the 1980s by French chemical engineer Joseph Davidovits, is fascinating because it would mean the ancient Egyptians were great materials scientists as well as great civil engineers.

Copyright 2008 by United Press International
http://www.physorg.com/news128167000.html

Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
Dwight E. Howell - 31 May 2008 05:13 GMT
> Scientists say pyramids could be concrete
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Posted by
> Robert Karl Stonjek

Of course many/most of the the blocks are full of intact fossils. That
by the way is pretty normal for limestone.
Rich Travsky - 10 Jun 2008 06:22 GMT
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
> Scientists say pyramids could be concrete
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Copyright 2008 by United Press International
> http://www.physorg.com/news128167000.html

Semi old news. See, for example

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061209122918.htm

from late 2006.
Dwight E. Howell - 23 Jun 2008 05:08 GMT
> Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
>> Scientists say pyramids could be concrete
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> from late 2006.

The problem being that the blocks in place contain uncountable millions
of fossils that were never crushed to make concrete.
Rich Travsky - 07 Jul 2008 05:43 GMT
> > Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
> >> Scientists say pyramids could be concrete
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> The problem being that the blocks in place contain uncountable millions
> of fossils that were never crushed to make concrete.

Neither link above mentions uncrushed fossils.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.