 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / July 2008For vested interest and national interest, NASA conceals most of the micrographs of Phoenix
For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. NASA has not released any micrograph taken by the atomic force microscope on board Mars Lander Phoenix. NASA has released only three optical micrographs since NASA tested the optical microscope on June 4,and reported no problem with the microscope. Most of the micrographs taken by Phoenix have not been released yet. Could NASA be trying to avoid the discovery of fossils on Mars? I suspected so, long before NASA blocked me from its website. I expected so, long before I wrote a google message entitled "NASA tries to wrap fire with paper". By now it should be clear to all keen observers why NASA repeatedly reminded people that Phoenix was not equipped to detect life, past or present and was not aimed to detect life. Any detection of past life should pass the strictest test of denial by anyone. Who stands to benefit from failure to find life on Mars? NASA's vested interest does. NASA is convinced that the failure is in the national interest. Believe it or not, in the next few days/weeks, NASA will convince the highest national leader that NASA should not reveal all the micrographs taken by Phoenix. Mars Rovers Opportunity and Spirit have released all their micrographs directly, without prior screening by NASA. Now NASA thinks persons like "i" could use the Phoenix microgragraphs to cheat the world into believing there was past life on Mars and such persons could jeopardize American national interest with naked truth. Mr. Bush and the general public could very possibly believe NASA. Who cares about God and its naked truth? > For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal > most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. I've avoided responding to this gentleman's posts, which argue the absurd notion that everywhere NASA has explored Mars it's found fossils. (That implies the entire planet is essentially covered with them). I can't resist, however, tweaking the notion that NASA would conceal such evidence. Such evidence would ensure a major increase in NASA's budget for robotic and human exploration of Mars, perhaps for for decades to come. Nor would concealment be in the national interest: the United States would have scored the greatest scientific coup of all time. NASA held a press conference to discuss possible (disputed) evidence for Martian life in a meteorite: the airwaves and the internet would be filled 24/7 with NASA scientists and spokespeople if definite Martian fossils ever turned up. The absence of a NASA response reinforces the notion that, if all the interested geologists on Earth have looked at these pictures and noticed no fossils, they are probably right. >> For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal >> most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > interested geologists on Earth have looked at these pictures and > noticed no fossils, they are probably right. I confess (I will deny it if confronted) that I love to browse this sort of stuff. I don't believe it for any number of reasons, both biological and simply logical without the "bio-," but it is a lot of fun to try to see what someone else thinks they are seeing. But in the case of these fossil Martian body parts, for the most part, I can't see a bloody thing. Fossilized lymph nodes lying around? What would that even _look_ like? How on Earth (or Mars) could you tell? And if you can preserve tings like loose lymph nodes, blood vessels, and random lonely Haversian canals, wouldn't the _bones_ be preserved? >>> For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal >>> most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > preserve tings like loose lymph nodes, blood vessels, and random lonely > Haversian canals, wouldn't the _bones_ be preserved? I picked up on the lymph nodes too. I hope the frozen sections came out OK. Ditto the Haversian canals. Back when they advertised cigarettes on television, there was a commercial for Viceroy cigarettes. The patient was being shown a variety of Rorschach blots. Every one was viewed as a man doing something "...and smoking a Viceroy". "I'm afraid" the psychiatrist said, with a voice right out of central casting for a Freud biography, "...you hef a feexation on Viceroy Longks!" "I don't know," said the patient, "they're YOUR Viceroy pictures!" Steve Steve  SignatureMark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 > > For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal > > most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > interested geologists on Earth have looked at these pictures and > noticed no fossils, they are probably right. Let an anatomist/pathologist/cell biologist, not a geologist, say I am wrong. No such people (anatomists) have ever said I wrong about fossils on Mars. >>> For vested interest and "national interest", NASA is trying to conceal >>> most of the micrographs taken by Mars Lander Phoenix. [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > am wrong. No such people (anatomists) have ever said I wrong about > fossils on Mars. That's even more stupid than human fossils in coal. Are you trying for some kind of lunatic record? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.