Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / August 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

News: Complete Neandertal mitochondrial genome sequenced from 38,000-year-old bone

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 08 Aug 2008 02:53 GMT
Complete Neandertal mitochondrial genome sequenced from 38,000-year-old bone

A study reported in the August 8th issue of the journal Cell, a Cell Press publication, reveals the complete mitochondrial genome of a 38,000-year-old Neandertal. The findings open a window into the Neandertals' past and helps answer lingering questions about our relationship to them.

" For the first time, we've built a sequence from ancient DNA that is essentially without error," said Richard Green of Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany.

The key is that they sequenced the Neandertal mitochondria-powerhouses of the cell with their own DNA including 13 protein-coding genes-nearly 35 times over. That impressive coverage allowed them to sort out those differences between the Neandertal and human genomes resulting from damage to the degraded DNA extracted from ancient bone versus true evolutionary changes.

Although it is well established that Neandertals are the hominid form most closely related to present-day humans, their exact relationship to us remains uncertain, according to the researchers. The notion that Neandertals and humans may have "mixed" is still a matter of some controversy.

Analysis of the new sequence confirms that the mitochondria of Neandertal's falls outside the variation found in humans today, offering no evidence of admixture between the two lineages although it remains a possibility. It also shows that the last common ancestor of Neandertals and humans lived about 660,000 years ago, give or take 140,000 years.

Of the 13 proteins encoded in the mitochondrial DNA, they found that one, known as subunit 2 of cytochrome c oxidase of the mitochondrial electron transport chain or COX2, had experienced a surprising number of amino acid substitutions in humans since the separation from Neandertals. While the finding is intriguing, Green said, it's not yet clear what it means.

"We also wanted to know about the history of the Neandertal's themselves," said Jeffrey Good, also of the Max-Planck Institute. For instance, the new sequence information revealed that the Neandertal's have fewer evolutionary changes overall, but a greater number that alter the amino acid building blocks of proteins. One straightforward interpretation of that finding is that the Neandertal's had a smaller population size than humans do, which makes natural selection less effective in removing mutations.

That notion is consistent with arguments made by other scientists based upon the geological record, said co-author Johannes Krause. "Most argue there were a few thousand Neandertals that roamed over Europe 40,000 years ago." That smaller population might have been the result of the smaller size of Europe compared to Africa. The Neandertals also would have had to deal with repeated glaciations, he noted.

" It's still an open question for the future whether this small group of Neandertals was a general feature, or was this caused by some bottleneck in their population size that happened late in the game?" Green said. Ultimately, they hope to get DNA sequence information for Neandertals that predated the Ice Age, to look for a signature that their populations had been larger in the past.

Technically, the Neandertal mitochondrial genome presented in the new study is a useful forerunner for the sequencing of the complete Neandertal nuclear genome, the researchers said, a feat that their team already has well underway.

Source: Cell Press
http://www.physorg.com/news137334959.html

Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
GoldLions - 09 Aug 2008 18:43 GMT
On Aug 7, 9:53�pm, "Robert Karl Stonjek" <ston...@ozemail.com.au>
wrote:
> Complete Neandertal mitochondrial genome sequenced from 38,000-year-old bone
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Posted by
> Robert Karl Stonjek

======================================

I wonder if now we'll be able to know their actual skin, eye and hair
coloration and whether these ancients had curly or straight hair or
had abundant body hair. What kind of diseases did they have? Etc.,
Should be interesting what these NEW results will reveal.
rwalker - 10 Aug 2008 02:40 GMT
snip

======================================

I wonder if now we'll be able to know their actual skin, eye and hair
coloration and whether these ancients had curly or straight hair or
had abundant body hair. What kind of diseases did they have? Etc.,
Should be interesting what these NEW results will reveal.

*******************************

Not from these data.  All they've done is sequence the mitochonrdrial DNA,
which doesn't affect the phenotype.  They'll need the somatic DNA sequence
for that.
rwalker - 11 Aug 2008 02:16 GMT
> snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> which doesn't affect the phenotype.  They'll need the somatic DNA sequence
> for that.

What I meant by somatic DNA is the nuclear DNA, which is what I meant to say
in the first place.
GoldLions - 11 Aug 2008 10:28 GMT
> > snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

===============================

Understood your previous comment and many thanks for your prompt
replies. Hope your day is a good one.
rwalker - 12 Aug 2008 05:51 GMT
On Aug 10, 9:16?pm, "rwalker" <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote:
> "rwalker" <rwal...@despammed.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

===============================

Understood your previous comment and many thanks for your prompt
replies. Hope your day is a good one.

+++++++++++++++++

Thanks.

You too.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.