 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / July 2009Dinosaurs suffer brain death if evolved into birds' RBC's
Dinosaurs will suffer brain death in 7 minutes if their RBC’s evolved into birds’ RBC’s. Humans become brain dead if red blood cells (RBC’s) don’t carry enough oxygen to human brain. Every hour a human being produces and destroys hundreds of millions of RBC’s. If some dinosaurs dared to try “evolving” their mammalian RBC’s into birds’ RBC’s, they will suffer brain death in seven minutes like humans, as birds’ RBC’s cannot deform to pass through the capillaries in the brain of the dinosaur. > Dinosaurs will suffer brain death in 7 minutes if their RBC’s evolved > into birds’ RBC’s. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > humans, as birds’ RBC’s cannot deform to pass through the capillaries > in the brain of the dinosaur. Stick with rocks, that's my advice. Dinosaurs presumably had the same kind of red blood cells as birds (i.e. with nuclei), as do crocodiles, lizards, frogs, and in fact all vertebrates other than mammals. On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > Dinosaurs will suffer brain death in 7 minutes if their RBC’s evolved > > into birds’ RBC’s. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > kind of red blood cells as birds (i.e. with nuclei), as do crocodiles, > lizards, frogs, and in fact all vertebrates other than mammals. You know little about red blood cells. I have read a 300-page book focusing on hematolgoy and blood cells. You still cannot tell the difference between birds' and mammals' red blood cells. Learn something about blood cells before babbling and presuming "Dinosaurs presumably had the same kind of red blood cells as birds" > On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > presumably had the same > kind of red blood cells as birds" I can easily tell the difference. Birds (and most vertebrates) have nuclei, and mammals don't. Isn't this stated somewhere in your 300-page book? You haven't explained what's wrong with my claim. >> On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman >> <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > nuclei, and mammals don't. Isn't this stated somewhere in your 300-page > book? You haven't explained what's wrong with my claim. I think the camal does not that I exactly care. >>> On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman >>> <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > I think the camal does not that I exactly care. Could you rephrase in English? > On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > presumably had the same > kind of red blood cells as birds" Learn something about dinosaurs and mammals before babbling and presuming that dinosaurs are mammals. News flash! Man uses sh.t-for brains! Full story at eleven on Action News 8!! > On 6月26日, 下午10時52分, John Harshman <jharshman.diespam...@pacbell.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > You know little about red blood cells. He seems to know more than you do, based upon your ridiculous OP. > I have read a 300-page book > focusing on hematolgoy and blood cells. And seem not to have learned a damned thing from it. > You still cannot tell the > difference between birds' and mammals' red blood cells. Learn > something about blood cells before babbling and presuming "Dinosaurs > presumably had the same > kind of red blood cells as birds" For someone as dumb as *you* to say someone else is "babbling" is the height of irony. -Panama Floyd, Atlanta. aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA! > Stick with rocks, that's my advice. Dinosaurs presumably had the same > kind of red blood cells as birds (i.e. with nuclei), as do crocodiles, > lizards, frogs, and in fact all vertebrates other than mammals. I'm more than a bit embarrassed to say I didn't know that most vertebrates had nucleated erythrocytes. I must have slept through my comparative hematology class. ;-) Thanks, Steve  SignatureMark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 On Jun 30, 12:40 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > Stick with rocks, that's my advice.Dinosaurspresumably had thesame > >kindofredbloodcellsas birds (i.e. with nuclei), as do crocodiles, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > vertebrates had nucleated erythrocytes. I musthaveslept through my > comparative hematology class. ;-) Hi, Doctor, you are my savior. You have corrected me a couple of times in the past. Now correct me again if the following were not mammalian red blood cells. http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203611&p=23 http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203612&p=24 Thank you, Steve. Lin Liangtai > Thanks, > Steve [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Brooklyn, NY > 718-258-5001 > On Jun 30, 12:40 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld > <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> Brooklyn, NY >> 718-258-5001 If you need me as a savior, you have bigger problems than erythrocytes. I'm not an expert on erythrocytes, though I certainly have seen enough human erythrocytes through a microscope. Those aren't human erythrocytes. I'll stick my neck out (the photomicrograph is not exactly in good focus) and say those do look like nuclei in them there cells. Steve SignatureMark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 On Jul 2, 2:50 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > On Jun 30, 12:40 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld > > <bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Dr. Steve, the following is an SEM of erythrocytes leaving broken blood vessels. Are they not mammalian RBC's ? > On Jul 2, 2:50 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld > [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > Dr. Steve, the following is an SEM of erythrocytes leaving broken > blood vessels. http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881251766&p=33 Were they mammalian or non-mammalian RBC's ? - Hide quoted text - > - Show quoted text - >> On Jul 2, 2:50 am, Mark & Steven Bornfeld >> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Were they mammalian or non-mammalian RBC's ? Time to learn the difference between a scanning electron microscope and a transmission light microscope. > RBC’s. If some dinosaurs dared to try “evolving” their mammalian > RBC’s Dinosaurs weren't mammals. >> RBC’s. If some dinosaurs dared to try “evolving” their mammalian >> RBC’s > > Dinosaurs weren't mammals. Maybe the 'Martian' ones were mammals :-) SignatureSmiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279 All gods are bespoke. They're all individually tailor made to perfectly fit the prejudices of their believer. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.