Early humans may have started talking half a million years ago
By Steve Connor Science Editor
22 June 2004
Scientists have come a step closer to answering one of the great unknowns in
human evolution - at what point did early man begin to use language?
A study of five skulls dating back 400,000 years suggests that humans of
that time already had the necessary auditory bones needed to understand
speech. The findings suggest the origin of language may date back even
further than those specimens, to perhaps as long as half a million years
ago, research said.
Although the ability to speak and understand language is a key development
in human evolution, estimates as to when it first arose vary wildly.
Some scientists suggest language proper only really took off when
anatomically modern humans evolved about 160,000 years ago because they had
the sufficiently complex brain needed for symbolic communication.
The latest study, however, suggests that language could have evolved at a
much earlier date, long before the first cave art paintings of about 35,000
years ago - the first unequivocal evidence of a symbolic brain.
All five hominid skulls in the study were found buried in a pit in a cave
site at Atapuerca in Spain. They belong to a species called Homo
heidelbergensis, which is thought to be a distant relative of the ancestral
line leading directly to modern man.
Because Homo heidelbergensis was not one of our direct ancestors, the
discovery that this hominid was able to understand speech suggests that
language may have in fact evolved in a much older common ancestor who lived
about 500,000 years ago, the scientists said.
Juan-Luis Arsuaga and Ignacio Martinez of the University of Alcala in Spain
analysed the bones of the skull's middle ear to estimate the range of sound
frequencies that they were most sensitive to.
They found that the owner of the skull would have been highly attuned to
sounds between 3 and 5 kilohertz which is similar to the 2-4kHz sensitivity
range of modern humans whose hearing is geared towards understanding spoken
words.
Read the rest at Independant News
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=533948
Comment:
An informal experiment that I did found that the chin boosted frequencies in
the same range (by 2-3db) indicating that the chin has a speech-language
relationship apart from anything else. If heidelbergensis has a chin then
this would be even more compelling evidence.

Signature
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek.
deowll - 22 Jun 2004 23:14 GMT
> Early humans may have started talking half a million years ago
> By Steve Connor Science Editor
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> range of modern humans whose hearing is geared towards understanding spoken
> words.
What range are chimps and other primates tuned to? Their auditory system
doesn't actually appear to be a stumbling block to them understanding spoken
language and many of them do understand it fairly well. Even dogs do.
> Read the rest at Independant News
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=533948
> Comment:
> An informal experiment that I did found that the chin boosted frequencies in
> the same range (by 2-3db) indicating that the chin has a speech-language
> relationship apart from anything else. If heidelbergensis has a chin then
> this would be even more compelling evidence.
deowll - 22 Jun 2004 23:25 GMT
> Early humans may have started talking half a million years ago
> By Steve Connor Science Editor
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> language may have in fact evolved in a much older common ancestor who lived
> about 500,000 years ago, the scientists said.
Some years ago I did some math on how many grand parents I would have had a
thosand or so generations back. It of course doubles each generation you go
back. The number got kind of large. At that point I figured out that you
couldn't look at my genes and state with any certainty who wasn't an
ancestor because I don't have any genes from most of them. All you can hope
to do is determine who might have been counted among them. I don't have
enough genes to have inherited anything from most of my ancestors.
This seems fairly simple minded and is but so is my point. Just because
somebody's genes are not to be found in the current population does not in
and off itself demonstrate who wasn't an ancestor especially if selection
has been operting on the population. Many genes will have been deleted that
were once common in my ancestors. That last statement is still true and self
evident even if they all did really only live in Aftrica up till 100,000
years or so ago.
You can prove, maybe, whose genes made it into the current gene pool but not
whose genes got weeded out but was still and ancestor X generations back.
> Juan-Luis Arsuaga and Ignacio Martinez of the University of Alcala in Spain
> analysed the bones of the skull's middle ear to estimate the range of sound
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Read the rest at Independant News
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=533948
> Comment:
> An informal experiment that I did found that the chin boosted frequencies in
> the same range (by 2-3db) indicating that the chin has a speech-language
> relationship apart from anything else. If heidelbergensis has a chin then
> this would be even more compelling evidence.