Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Article: Farming origins gain 10,000 years

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 23 Jun 2004 21:32 GMT
Farming origins gain 10,000 years
Humans made their first tentative steps towards farming 23,000 years ago,
much earlier than previously thought.
Stone Age people in Israel collected the seeds of wild grasses some 10,000
years earlier than previously recognised, experts say.

These grasses included wild emmer wheat and barley, which were forerunners
of the varieties grown today.

A US-Israeli team report their findings in the latest Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences.

The evidence comes from a collection of 90,000 prehistoric plant remains dug
up at Ohalo in the north of the country.

The Ohalo site was submerged in prehistoric times and left undisturbed until
recent excavations by Ehud Weiss of Harvard University and his colleagues.

This low-oxygen environment beautifully preserved the charred plant remains
deposited there in Stone Age times.

Archaeologists have also found huts, camp fires, a human grave and stone
tools at the site.

Broad diet

Most of the evidence points to the Near East as the cradle of farming.
Indeed, the principal plant foods eaten by the people at Ohalo appear to
have been grasses, including the wild cereals emmer wheat and barley.

Grass remains also included a huge amount of small-grained wild grasses at
Ohalo such as brome, foxtail and alkali grass. However, these small-grained
wild grasses were to disappear from the human diet by about 13,000 ago.

Anthropologists think farming may have started when hunter-gatherer groups
in South-West Asia were put under pressure by expanding human populations
and a reduction in hunting territories.

This forced them to rely less heavily on hunting large hoofed animals like
gazelle, fallow deer and wild cattle and broaden their diets to include
small mammals, birds, fish and small grass seeds; the latter regarded as an
essential first step towards agriculture.

These low-ranking foods are so-called because of the greater amount of work
involved in catching them than the return from the food itself.

Investigations at Ohalo also show that the human diet was much broader
during these Stone Age times than previously thought.

"We can say that such dietary breadth was never seen again in the Levant,"
the researchers write in their Proceedings paper.

From the BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3826731.stm

Signature

Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek.

R.Schenck - 25 Jun 2004 14:48 GMT
snip
> From the BBC
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3826731.stm

These is considered evidence that they gathered and ate the seeds tho
no?  Not that they planted and maintained them right?

Tho the article does mention that they had huts and that this was
wider evidence that people were eating a broader array of foodstuffs,
so I would think that that indicates that this was a sedentary sort of
settlement, which would be something of a prerequisite for full-blown
farming.
Tom McDonald - 25 Jun 2004 20:19 GMT
> snip
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> settlement, which would be something of a prerequisite for full-blown
> farming.

    The BBC article is based on an article in PNAS.  This is the
link to the PNAS abstract of that article.  (For some reason, I
was able to read the full text in .pdf, yesterday and this
morning.  Now I can't.)

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0402362101v1

    If you can get this full-text, I think you will find it
interesting, but not epochal.  YMMV.

    I don't think this study is evidence for sedentism.  I think it
may be evidence for increasing population, with concomitant
decrease in the home territory of human groups.

    To answer your first and second questions, yes.  The study
doesn't indicate or imply domestication or farming, but rather a
broadening of the range of food resources used.

    I found it interesting that the find studied included use of a
number of large-grained grasses (cereals, like emer wheat and
large barley) as well as smaller-grained grasses (SGG).  While
the SGG remains were numerically far greater than the cereal
grains, the total mass of used seeds was significantly in favor
of the larger grained cereals.

    This indicates that the people were willing to go to the
trouble to gather and prepare SGGs (which winds up with a very
small net energy gain), but probably preferred the larger grain
cereals, which require far less energy to gather and prepare
than the SGGs.  Unsurprisingly, when much later the folks with
access to this variety of grains started the process of
domestication, they focused on the grains that provided the
biggest energy income for the least energy outlay.

Tom McDonald
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.