Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / July 2004

Ancient African Skull Fills Gap, Fuels Debate
Sarah Graham
July 02, 2004

Remains of the hominids that lived in Africa between a million and half a
million years ago are frustratingly rare in the fossil record. Bones from
this time period have been recovered in Europe and Asia, but the paucity of
finds from Africa has prevented a full understanding of just what members of
the species Homo erectus looked like. Indeed, some paleontologists posit
that hominids from this time period should be divided into multiple
lineages, whereas others suggest that there was simply wide variation within
H. erectus. A discovery described today in the journal Science is helping to
fill the fossil gap.

Richard Potts of the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.,
and his colleagues found 11 fragments of a single hominid skull during
excavations at an archaeological site in Olorgesailie, Kenya. Together these
finds mark the first discovery of ancient human bone at the site since
exploration began in 1942. Based on radiometric dating and sedimentary
evidence, the team estimates that the fossil is between 900,000 and 970,000
years old. The skull is from an adult or near-adult and shares some features
with H. erectus. If it is a member of this species, it is a very petite
representative. The researchers note that it is the smallest individual yet
known from the time interval spanning 1.7 million and half a million years
ago. Because many of the tools recovered from the same site are large and
would have required significant strength and size to handle, Potts and his
collaborators conclude that there was wide physical variation in the
population to which this hominid belonged, with both large and small
individuals present.

Other researchers interpret the new find differently, however. "[The skull]
doesn't look like anything else we know so far," contends Jeffrey H.
Schwartz of the University of Pittsburgh, who penned an accompanying
commentary in Science. He argues that a number of the fossils categorized as
H. erectus show too much variation from the original, or type, H. erectus
skull discovered in the late 19th century in Java to be considered members
of the same species.

From NewScientist