Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Score one for the mammals!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Darren Garrison - 12 Jan 2005 22:35 GMT
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=dinosaur+mammal

I bet it tasted like chicken.
John Harshman - 12 Jan 2005 23:03 GMT
> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=dinosaur+mammal
>
> I bet it tasted like chicken.

Science press releases are so annoying. Once again all of our views of
the Mesozoic have been revolutionized by a single fossil. Yawn.
John Brock - 14 Jan 2005 18:43 GMT
>> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=dinosaur+mammal
>>
>> I bet it tasted like chicken.

>Science press releases are so annoying. Once again all of our views of
>the Mesozoic have been revolutionized by a single fossil. Yawn.

Given its size, the fact that this mammal ate (young) dinosaurs is
no surprise at all.  It's the size that's a surprise (at least to
me).  Did we know for sure, before now, that mammals in that time
period got that big?
Signature

John Brock
jbrock@panix.com

John Harshman - 14 Jan 2005 19:26 GMT
>>>http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=dinosaur+mammal
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> me).  Did we know for sure, before now, that mammals in that time
> period got that big?

Actually, there are two species. The big one is new. The one that had
the dinosaur in its stomach was previously known, but is smaller. What
this find has done is confirm a little bit about the dietary habits of
one species and increased the size of the largest known Mesozoic mammal
by 50%. But those were two separate events.
hanafin@alloymail.com - 14 Jan 2005 03:49 GMT
I saw this article in the metro this morning.  It is a very nice find!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.