> http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/package.jsp?name=fte/seamonster/seamonster&floc
=wn-np
Ack. More crap. It would appear to be a protorosaur, which is at least a
diapsid.
John Scanlon - 20 Oct 2005 05:22 GMT
See
Li, C., O. Rieppel, and M.C. LaBarbera. 2004. A triassic aquatic
protorosaur with an extremely long neck. Science 305(Sept. 24):1931.
Abstract available at
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/305/5692/1931