A Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Richard Dawkins - 26 Nov 2005 03:44 GMT

Award-winning journalist Pamela Winnick will speak on her new book: A
Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion, at Discovery's DC offices.
In her book, Winnick reveals how science has today become a religion of its
own, complete with its own furious Inquisitors who ruthlessly punish even
the most innocuous dissent from its established line. Winnick, who describes
herself as "a New York liberal Democrat who is Jewish and not religious,"
was amazed to discover, while researching the latest science/religion
skirmishes, that social conservatives were the real heros and the champions
of free thought in the modern world.

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=179&program=&i
sEvent=true

Signature

~There are no true atheists in Christian newsgroups.~

Reply to this Message

Dante - 27 Nov 2005 17:19 GMT

"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> suddenly spluttered:

>~There are no true atheists in Christian newsgroups.~

You never tire of lying, do you, ray?

Reply to this Message

Richard Dawkins - 27 Nov 2005 20:33 GMT

> "Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> suddenly spluttered:
>
>>~There are no true atheists in Christian newsgroups.~
>
> You never tire of lying, do you, ray?

Thank you for lending validity and support to the sig.
You hate God and that's why you lurk in religious forums.
Dude get real.
No one believes that you're an atheist by the fact that your here.
Why is that so hard for you to accept?

Reply to this Message

<Yournamehere>'s personal Cthulhu - 27 Nov 2005 23:47 GMT

"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> suddenly spluttered:

>> "Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> suddenly spluttered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>No one believes that you're an atheist by the fact that your here.
>Why is that so hard for you to accept?

I don't lurk, I strut. I don't like liars like you, and wherever you
are, I will call you on your lies. The only option you have is to stop
lying and the easiest way you have of achieving this is to stop
posting.

------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.

D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN

AA #2208

Reply to this Message

Jesus H Christ - 02 Dec 2005 13:20 GMT

"Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> wrote in news:QKoif.103$T95.13060
@news.uswest.net:

>> "Richard Dawkins" <Dawkins@Hell.com> suddenly spluttered:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thank you for lending validity and support to the sig.
> You hate God and that's why you lurk in religious forums.

You retard, YOU posted originally to groups including

sci.anthropology.paleo,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.skeptic

which makes you a lying f.cking hypocrite.

> Dude get real.
> No one believes that you're an atheist by the fact that your here.

What, here in sci.skeptic where I read it?

You are one deranged fundie, aren't you?

> Why is that so hard for you to accept?

Because you're obviously deranged and unable to comprehend your own
actions.

You're out of your tiny little mind. You need psychiatric help.

Wash my feet, fundie!

jesus

Reply to this Message

John C. Randolph - 01 Dec 2005 03:54 GMT

> furious Inquisitors who ruthlessly punish even the most innocuous
> dissent from its established line.

Bullshit. Show me an example of an IDiot who's been punished by a scientist.

Criticism isn't censorship, and ridicule isn't punishment. If any of
the Discovery Institute clowns had been tossed in a dungeon or
stretched on a rack, then a comparison to the Inquisition might be in
order. They haven't, so it isn't.

-jcr

Reply to this Message

David Jensen - 01 Dec 2005 05:00 GMT

>> furious Inquisitors who ruthlessly punish even the most innocuous
>> dissent from its established line.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>stretched on a rack, then a comparison to the Inquisition might be in
>order. They haven't, so it isn't.

Let's also remember that the Inquisition was defending statements about
the state of the universe that were proving to be false, while the
Discovery Institute people are utterly indifferent to whether their
statements are true or false, though their ID statements are false, as
long as the statements fit their political goals.

Reply to this Message

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / December 2005

A Jealous God: Science's Crusade Against Religion