Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question re. diurnal dinosaurs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Arkitek - 01 Dec 2005 00:40 GMT
Hi,

I'm just peaking in to see if you can help me with some information.

Can you please tell me if allasaurs and/or giganatosaurs were diurnal?

Thanks!
John Harshman - 01 Dec 2005 01:53 GMT
> Hi,
>
> I'm just peaking in to see if you can help me with some information.
>
> Can you please tell me if allasaurs and/or giganatosaurs were diurnal?

How would anyone know? We try to recognize nocturnal animals by their
possession of very large eyes. Allosaurs and giganatosaurs do not have
unusually large eyes. Make of that what you will. Troodonts do have
unusually large eyes; perhaps they were nocturnal. Perhaps they weren't.
Arkitek - 01 Dec 2005 02:08 GMT
Thanks John!
John Harshman - 01 Dec 2005 03:13 GMT
> Thanks John!

That was helping?
deowll - 02 Dec 2005 02:26 GMT
>> Thanks John!
>>
> That was helping?

Learning that something isn't known can be a huge help. You might have added
that most or even all modern predators of any size seem to be diurnal.
John Harshman - 02 Dec 2005 03:15 GMT
>>>Thanks John!
>>
>>That was helping?
>
> Learning that something isn't known can be a huge help. You might have added
> that most or even all modern predators of any size seem to be diurnal.

I don't think that's true.
deowll - 03 Dec 2005 01:22 GMT
>>>>Thanks John!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
> I don't think that's true.

Name something.
John Harshman - 03 Dec 2005 01:43 GMT
>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Name something.

It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
mistaken?
John Wilkins - 03 Dec 2005 01:57 GMT
>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
> mistaken?

Leopards, jaguars, and I think tigers too. Large owls are nocturnal, of course.

Signature

John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Nihil tam absurdum quod non quidam Philosophi dixerit - adapted from Cicero

George - 03 Dec 2005 03:24 GMT
>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Leopards, jaguars, and I think tigers too. Large owls are nocturnal, of
> course.

As well as a few  prosimians.

George
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:31 GMT
>>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> George

Are they large preditors.
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:29 GMT
>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Leopards, jaguars, and I think tigers too. Large owls are nocturnal, of
> course.

The last one avoids being active in the day time. They also don't weigh very
much.
John Brock - 03 Dec 2005 01:57 GMT
>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
>mistaken?

I seem to remember reading that the main reason that hyenas were
originally considered to be primarily scavengers was most of their
active hunting was done at night.  It seems to me that all current
large land preditors can be classified as either cat family (including
hyenas) or dog family (including bears).  The cats are generally
active at night; the dogs aren't.  Have I missed anything?
Signature

John Brock
jbrock@panix.com

John Shakespeare - 03 Dec 2005 08:03 GMT
>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> hyenas) or dog family (including bears).  The cats are generally
> active at night; the dogs aren't.  Have I missed anything?

Large modern reptiles. I don't know whether Komodo dragons hunt at
night, but some large snakes definitely do. I'd class big pythons as
large predators - some can swallow a pig.

Is this limited this to terrestrial and aerial predators? A lot of
marine predators hunt at night. Those relying on vision might be
confined to diurnal hunting (e.g. octopuses) but those which primarily
use other senses (e.g. sharks, dolphins, angler fish) may not
particularly care whether it's day or night.

BTW, an activity requiring adequate lighting, such as sight-based
hunting, is not completely confined to daylight hours. A full moon or
near full moon with relatively clear skies also facilitates sight-based
hunting. Recall the term "hunter's moon" used by large primate hunters
which are otherwise mostly diurnal. So, primates on the list also?

Best Regards,
John.
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:36 GMT
>>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> but some large snakes definitely do. I'd class big pythons as large
> predators - some can swallow a pig.

But are they truly nocturnal as opposed to active day or night? I've seen
film of big cats hunting during the day and I've seen small cats hunting
during the day. I doubt if either the Komodo dragons or pythons care.

> Is this limited this to terrestrial and aerial predators? A lot of marine
> predators hunt at night. Those relying on vision might be confined to
> diurnal hunting (e.g. octopuses) but those which primarily use other
> senses (e.g. sharks, dolphins, angler fish) may not particularly care
> whether it's day or night.

My point was limited to large land preditors but have fun.

> BTW, an activity requiring adequate lighting, such as sight-based hunting,
> is not completely confined to daylight hours. A full moon or near full
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Best Regards,
> John.
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:30 GMT
>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> hyenas) or dog family (including bears).  The cats are generally
> active at night; the dogs aren't.  Have I missed anything?

That all of these animals hunt both day and night.
John Brock - 07 Dec 2005 02:22 GMT
>>>It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
>>>mistaken?

>> I seem to remember reading that the main reason that hyenas were
>> originally considered to be primarily scavengers was most of their
>> active hunting was done at night.  It seems to me that all current
>> large land preditors can be classified as either cat family (including
>> hyenas) or dog family (including bears).  The cats are generally
>> active at night; the dogs aren't.  Have I missed anything?

>That all of these animals hunt both day and night.

Are you saying it is typical of wolves or bears to hunt at night?
I'm not saying it never happens, but my impression was that it was
far less typical than for cats or hyenas.  Do you have any links
for this?
Signature

John Brock
jbrock@panix.com

deowll - 10 Dec 2005 05:30 GMT
>>>>It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
>>>>mistaken?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> far less typical than for cats or hyenas.  Do you have any links
> for this?

I've seen some film and read some books but never had to look this up on
line. Canines have fairly poor color vision and excellent night vision. My
guess is that bears might be the least active at night but then they eat a
lot of plant food and I don't think you'll have any trouble finding accounts
of bears raiding trash cans, camp sites, and such after dark.

Let me make a wild guess. You've never been out with a pack of coon hounds
(any dog in a pinch) after dark. You need the flash light. They don't.
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:28 GMT
>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> It seems to me that most cats are active at night. Even lions. Am I
> mistaken?

Very true. They are also active in the day time. That matches up with
diurnal which is what I said.
John Harshman - 07 Dec 2005 04:59 GMT
>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Very true. They are also active in the day time. That matches up with
> diurnal which is what I said.

I think that if you check you will find that most big cats do most of
their hunting at night. As do hyenas. Are you claiming that any
day-hunting makes an animal diurnal, not nocturnal?
deowll - 10 Dec 2005 05:40 GMT
>>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> their hunting at night. As do hyenas. Are you claiming that any
> day-hunting makes an animal diurnal, not nocturnal?

Isn't that what the dictionary says?

The two behaviors are on a continuum. Most animals might be more active
before or after dark but only a few large terrestrial meat eaters are
anything like cleanly one or the other.

Are you saying that you consider animals you know hunt during daylight hours
nocturnal?

Many owl species and bats are nearly or even completely nocturnal. Unless
disturbed they aren't going to do jack in light. I'd call them nocturnal.
Some squids and many kinds of fish are as well.
John Harshman - 10 Dec 2005 06:42 GMT
>>>>>>>>>Thanks John!
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Isn't that what the dictionary says?

I haven't looked, but I doubt it.

> The two behaviors are on a continuum. Most animals might be more active
> before or after dark but only a few large terrestrial meat eaters are
> anything like cleanly one or the other.
>
> Are you saying that you consider animals you know hunt during daylight hours
> nocturnal?

I think that would depend on percentages. I would consider an animal
that hunts mostly at night to be nocturnal, and one that hunts mostly
during the day to be diurnal, and if the proportions were about even I
wouldn't know what to call it.

> Many owl species and bats are nearly or even completely nocturnal. Unless
> disturbed they aren't going to do jack in light. I'd call them nocturnal.
> Some squids and many kinds of fish are as well.

This has become a very silly argument.
John Wilkins - 01 Dec 2005 05:26 GMT
>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> unusually large eyes. Make of that what you will. Troodonts do have
> unusually large eyes; perhaps they were nocturnal. Perhaps they weren't.

Well, no one's ever seen one about at night. That counts for something,
doesn't it?

Signature

John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Nihil tam absurdum quod non quidam Philosophi dixerit - adapted from Cicero

George - 01 Dec 2005 07:44 GMT
>>>Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Well, no one's ever seen one about at night. That counts for something,
> doesn't it?

I thought I saw one once under my bed when I was a child.  It turned out to
be an old shirt.  lol

George
John Harshman - 01 Dec 2005 17:50 GMT
>>>Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Well, no one's ever seen one about at night. That counts for something,
> doesn't it?

Dunno about you, but I've seen plenty: owls, nighthawks, and nightjars
mostly. You may have seen a frogmouth or two.
Arkitek - 01 Dec 2005 18:19 GMT
Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
experts on this question.

The reason I ask is because I am working on an animation for a biotech
company that is producing a drug which targets the negative effects of
macular degeneration. We are starting off by showing eye structure
comparisons (rods vs. cones) between a dinosaur and a mammal.  Didn't
want to risk making a poor choice of dinosaurs to illustrate this. If
for some reason one of the two types I mentioned were suspected to be
nocturnal and not diurnal, then that would affect the credibility of
the introduction.

I really do appreciate the input, and the giggles. So once again,
thanks John!

> >>>Hi,
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Dunno about you, but I've seen plenty: owls, nighthawks, and nightjars
> mostly. You may have seen a frogmouth or two.
John Harshman - 01 Dec 2005 20:04 GMT
> Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
> experts on this question.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I really do appreciate the input, and the giggles. So once again,
> thanks John!

Sure, but however would you determine the eye structure of an extinct
theropod? You would be better off using a living theropod, like a
chicken or pigeon. For the extinct ones, I suppose you could pick
something in between a crocodile and a bird, but that would closely
resemble a random guess.

[snip]
deowll - 02 Dec 2005 02:34 GMT
>> Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
>> experts on this question.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> something in between a crocodile and a bird, but that would closely
> resemble a random guess.

Are you sure that their eyes are that different?

> [snip]
John Harshman - 02 Dec 2005 03:16 GMT
>>>Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
>>>experts on this question.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Are you sure that their eyes are that different?

No. If we're talking about maculae, though, structure differs
tremendously within birds. I don't know anything about crocodile eyes.
deowll - 02 Dec 2005 02:33 GMT
> Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
> experts on this question.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I really do appreciate the input, and the giggles. So once again,
> thanks John!

As a group the remaining dino relatives have excellent color vision normally
including animals which continue to be active at night. This suggests that
the trait of being active during the day is very old. Humans have some of
the best color vision going for mammals which as a group don't have first
rate color vision. Dino age mammals may have been mainly nocturnal.

I guess I'm saying you should be safe showing any dino as being active
during the day time with good vision.

>> >>>Hi,
>> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>> Dunno about you, but I've seen plenty: owls, nighthawks, and nightjars
>> mostly. You may have seen a frogmouth or two.
John Wilkins - 02 Dec 2005 02:56 GMT
> Alright now, I knew I was potentially inviting ridicule by going to the
> experts on this question.

I'm no expert - I'm a professional Mocker. John H knows this.
...

Signature

John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
Nihil tam absurdum quod non quidam Philosophi dixerit - adapted from Cicero

Barney Purple Dinosaur - 05 Dec 2005 19:35 GMT
"Arkitek" <amyesj@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1133397654.081243.182520
@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Thanks!

If you believe they were exothermic, then probably.

-- Barney, who usually comes out at 10:30 am, check your local listings
deowll - 07 Dec 2005 01:38 GMT
> "Arkitek" <amyesj@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1133397654.081243.182520
> @g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> If you believe they were exothermic, then probably.

Okay you lost me. Don't you mean the other way around? Of course these
animals were so large as adults that being evenly mildly active would
produce a lot of heat not rapidly lost.

> -- Barney, who usually comes out at 10:30 am, check your local listings
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.