Although I love the idea of this huge, hyena-like beast, the one skull
fragment found looks just like an entelodont. I'm thinking this was
wishful thinking, rather than science.
Anyone else come to the same conclusion?
Pegleg
deowll - 19 Jul 2006 19:53 GMT
> Although I love the idea of this huge, hyena-like beast, the one skull
> fragment found looks just like an entelodont. I'm thinking this was
> wishful thinking, rather than science.
> Anyone else come to the same conclusion?
>
> Pegleg
Most sources seem to think it belonged to a very large hoofed meat eater
with a wolf like body. Smaller ones were common at the time and enough was
found to make the connection reasonably solid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrewsarchus_mongoliensishttp://en.wikipedia.org/w
iki/Andrewsarchus_mongoliensishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrewsarchus_mongoli
ensis
John Harshman - 19 Jul 2006 21:15 GMT
> Although I love the idea of this huge, hyena-like beast, the one skull
> fragment found looks just like an entelodont. I'm thinking this was
> wishful thinking, rather than science.
> Anyone else come to the same conclusion?
First, it's not a skull fragment -- it's pretty much everything except
the mandible. And no, it looks nothing like an entelodont to me: the
back teeth are shearing, there's no postorbital bar at all, there's a
big sagittal crest. And that's just from a cursory examination of a
photo. It sure looks like a mesonychian.
deowll - 21 Jul 2006 04:55 GMT
>> Although I love the idea of this huge, hyena-like beast, the one skull
>> fragment found looks just like an entelodont. I'm thinking this was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> big sagittal crest. And that's just from a cursory examination of a
> photo. It sure looks like a mesonychian.
There were some other fragments as well. All sources go for a largest known
mesonychain or something really close.