
Signature
Reply in group, but if emailing add another
zero, and remove the last word
>>>Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?
>>
>>Reptiles. Diapsids. Lepidosauromorphs. Sauropterygians.
>
> So, is there any indication that they were air breathing, or if any species
> had gills?
Gills, being soft and squishy, are very rarely preserved as fossils.
Some animals with gills have bony supports or covers for them, but some
don't. However, considering that no living amniotes have gills and that
there is no evidence for any extinct amniote ever having had gills, it's
safe to bet that plesiosaurs didn't either. It's also highly probable
that they didn't have feathers or flowers.
The Last Conformist - 25 Jul 2006 22:46 GMT
> >>>Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> safe to bet that plesiosaurs didn't either. It's also highly probable
> that they didn't have feathers or flowers.
On the subject of plesiosaur respiration, I can't help but wonder how
elasmosaur went about breathing. That's an awfull long and thin
windpipe.
I suppose being (presumably) ectothermic helped.
Aardvark J. Bandersnatch - 28 Jul 2006 15:23 GMT
> On the subject of plesiosaur respiration, I can't help but wonder how
> elasmosaur went about breathing. That's an awfull long and thin
> windpipe.
'Twould help summat were the esophagus heavily lined with capillaries.