Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Plesiosaurs

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tom Del Rosso - 19 Jul 2006 01:06 GMT
Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?

Signature

Reply in group, but if emailing add another
zero, and remove the last word.

John Harshman - 19 Jul 2006 01:17 GMT
> Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?

Reptiles. Diapsids. Lepidosauromorphs. Sauropterygians.
Tom Del Rosso - 19 Jul 2006 08:26 GMT
> > Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?
> >
> Reptiles. Diapsids. Lepidosauromorphs. Sauropterygians.

So, is there any indication that they were air breathing, or if any species
had gills?

Signature

Reply in group, but if emailing add another
zero, and remove the last word

John Harshman - 19 Jul 2006 15:28 GMT
>>>Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?
>>
>>Reptiles. Diapsids. Lepidosauromorphs. Sauropterygians.
>
> So, is there any indication that they were air breathing, or if any species
> had gills?

Gills, being soft and squishy, are very rarely preserved as fossils.
Some animals with gills have bony supports or covers for them, but some
don't. However, considering that no living amniotes have gills and that
there is no evidence for any extinct amniote ever having had gills, it's
safe to bet that plesiosaurs didn't either. It's also highly probable
that they didn't have feathers or flowers.
The Last Conformist - 25 Jul 2006 22:46 GMT
> >>>Were plesiosaurs fish, amphibians, or reptiles?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> safe to bet that plesiosaurs didn't either. It's also highly probable
> that they didn't have feathers or flowers.

On the subject of plesiosaur respiration, I can't help but wonder how
elasmosaur went about breathing. That's an awfull long and thin
windpipe.

I suppose being (presumably) ectothermic helped.
Aardvark J. Bandersnatch - 28 Jul 2006 15:23 GMT
> On the subject of plesiosaur respiration, I can't help but wonder how
> elasmosaur went about breathing. That's an awfull long and thin
> windpipe.

'Twould help summat were the esophagus heavily lined with capillaries.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.