Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Paper: Late Pleistocene Human Skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and Modern Human Origins

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert Karl Stonjek - 13 Jan 2007 04:57 GMT
Science 12 January 2007:
     Vol. 315. no. 5809, pp. 226 - 229
     DOI: 10.1126/science.1136294
     

Late Pleistocene Human Skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and Modern Human Origins
F. E. Grine,1* R. M. Bailey,2 K. Harvati,3 R. P. Nathan,4 A. G. Morris,5 G. M. Henderson,6 I. Ribot,7 A. W. G. Pike8
The lack of Late Pleistocene human fossils from sub-Saharan Africa has limited paleontological testing of competing models of recent human evolution. We have dated a skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, to 36.2 ± 3.3 thousand years ago through a combination of optically stimulated luminescence and uranium-series dating methods. The skull is morphologically modern overall but displays some archaic features. Its strongest morphometric affinities are with Upper Paleolithic (UP) Eurasians rather than recent, geographically proximate people. The Hofmeyr cranium is consistent with the hypothesis that UP Eurasians descended from a population that emigrated from sub-Saharan Africa in the Late Pleistocene.

1 Departments of Anthropology and Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
2 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
3 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
4 Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
5 Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
6 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PR, UK.
7 Département d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
8 Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UU, UK.

Source: Science
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/315/5809/226?etoc

Signature

Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

Jois - 13 Jan 2007 14:41 GMT
       Science 12 January 2007:
       Vol. 315. no. 5809, pp. 226 - 229
       DOI: 10.1126/science.1136294
       

 Late Pleistocene Human Skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, and Modern Human Origins
 F. E. Grine,1* R. M. Bailey,2 K. Harvati,3 R. P. Nathan,4 A. G. Morris,5 G. M. Henderson,6 I. Ribot,7 A. W. G. Pike8
 The lack of Late Pleistocene human fossils from sub-Saharan Africa has limited paleontological testing of competing models of recent human evolution. We have dated a skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa, to 36.2 ± 3.3 thousand years ago through a combination of optically stimulated luminescence and uranium-series dating methods. The skull is morphologically modern overall but displays some archaic features. Its strongest morphometric affinities are with Upper Paleolithic (UP) Eurasians rather than recent, geographically proximate people. The Hofmeyr cranium is consistent with the hypothesis that UP Eurasians descended from a population that emigrated from sub-Saharan Africa in the Late Pleistocene.

 1 Departments of Anthropology and Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
 2 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
 3 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
 4 Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.
 5 Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, South Africa.
 6 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PR, UK.
 7 Département d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
 8 Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UU, UK.

 Source: Science
 http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/315/5809/226?etoc

 --
 Posted by
 Robert Karl Stonjek

 Thanks, Robert, be interesting to learn which archaic features were present in the skull.

 Does anyone estimate how long it would take to go from sub-Saharan Africa to Eurasia?  

 Jois

 --
 My dogs are not my children.
 At least that is what their piano teacher says.
John Roth - 14 Jan 2007 15:37 GMT
>         Science 12 January 2007:
>         Vol. 315. no. 5809, pp. 226 - 229
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>   My dogs are not my children.
>   At least that is what their piano teacher says.

You might want to look at what Hawks is saying. It's very mild
compared to the criticism that's come up in some other venues.

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/fossils/upper/africa/hofmeyr_2007.html

John Roth
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.