> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
> extinction of the dinosaurs,
> there are other possibilities.
Do any of these other possibilities result in a worldwide layer of
iridium-enriched mud, shocked quartz, and tektites?
> The sun's output is not necessarily
> constant. There are many variable
> stars and a fluctuation of as little as 1% in solar output could have
> dramatic consequences.
> What was responsible for the ice ages?
Milankovitch cycles.
> Also, depletion of atmospheric
> carbon dioxide by plants
> and organisms could cause a reduction of average temperatures. There
> is quite a lot of carbon
> locked-up in coal and petroleum and in carbonate rock.
Any evidence for a sharp climate change at the K/T boundary?
Andy - 14 Feb 2007 17:38 GMT
>> The sun's output is not necessarily
>> constant. There are many variable
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Milankovitch cycles.
But Milankovitch doesn't explain lack of ice ages in the Devonian,
Triassic, Jurassic ... and more.
John Harshman - 14 Feb 2007 18:10 GMT
>>>The sun's output is not necessarily
>>>constant. There are many variable
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> But Milankovitch doesn't explain lack of ice ages in the Devonian,
> Triassic, Jurassic ... and more.
I'm sure that oceanic currents influenced by continental distributions
have a lot to say about it. The real question is whether this has
anything to do with the K/T extinction.
deowll - 15 Feb 2007 02:50 GMT
>>> The sun's output is not necessarily
>>> constant. There are many variable
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> But Milankovitch doesn't explain lack of ice ages in the Devonian,
> Triassic, Jurassic ... and more.
It is claimed that the position of the continents combined with the uplift
that produce the Himalayas triggered the cycle of ice ages.
deowll - 15 Feb 2007 02:49 GMT
>> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>> extinction of the dinosaurs,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Any evidence for a sharp climate change at the K/T boundary?
Major geologic changes were occuring but the climate didn't do a significant
cool off until much later to the best of my knowledge.
John Harshman - 15 Feb 2007 04:40 GMT
>>>While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>>>extinction of the dinosaurs,
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Major geologic changes were occuring but the climate didn't do a significant
> cool off until much later to the best of my knowledge.
Egzackly.
MyCat - 17 Feb 2007 03:32 GMT
>> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>> extinction of the dinosaurs,
>> there are other possibilities.
>
> Do any of these other possibilities result in a worldwide layer of
> iridium-enriched mud, shocked quartz, and tektites?
Please explain the even larger impacts that did NOT result in mass
extinctions.
deowll - 18 Feb 2007 05:14 GMT
>>> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>>> extinction of the dinosaurs,
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Please explain the even larger impacts that did NOT result in mass
> extinctions.
A lot of things were going on that could have stressed some organisms. The
impact would have made conditions much worse.
Which larger impacts did not cause mass extinctions?
Gautam Majumdar - 17 Feb 2007 08:46 GMT
>> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>> extinction of the dinosaurs,
>> there are other possibilities.
>
> Do any of these other possibilities result in a worldwide layer of
> iridium-enriched mud, shocked quartz, and tektites?
There was certainly a major impact at K-T boundary, but was that the only
cause of the mass extinction ? A major flood basalt eruption was going on
at the same time (Deccan Traps). Several other mass extinctions, such as
end-Permian (Siberian Traps) and end-Triassic (Central Atlantic) mass
extinctions also happened at the same time as major flood basalt
eruptions. Could there not be a cause-effect link between such eruptions
and mass extinction ? On the otherhand evidence for an impact is
non-existent, in spite of quite extensive search, for mass extinctions
other than at the K-T boundary.

Signature
gautam
deowll - 25 May 2007 03:59 GMT
>>> While I agree that it is possible that an asteroid impact caused the
>>> extinction of the dinosaurs,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> non-existent, in spite of quite extensive search, for mass extinctions
> other than at the K-T boundary.
I don't know much about it but there was a localized one in South America.
I listened watched a broadcast that seems to link major impacts with major
basalt flooding events but I leave it to others to fight that war.