 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Biology / Paleontology / November 2007Some Dinosaurs Had Two Brains
Some dinosaurs had two brains! Since nerve signals move from one part of the body to another relatively slowly - it takes 1/50 of second to notice a pain in your foot - and since these beasts were so large, a second brain was at the base of the tail to maintain control of the creature's backs. Interestingly, the rear brain was bigger than the one in their heads. - from the Animals section of www.odd-info.com > Some dinosaurs had two brains! Since nerve signals move from one part > of the body to another relatively slowly - it takes 1/50 of second to > notice a pain in your foot - and since these beasts were so large, a > second brain was at the base of the tail to maintain control of the > creature's backs. Interestingly, the rear brain was bigger than the > one in their heads. - from the Animals section of www.odd-info.com That was the dinosaur Core 2 Duo ... which later evolved into the human male. :-)  SignatureThomas T. Veldhouse We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. > > Some dinosaurs had two brains! Since nerve signals move from one part > > of the body to another relatively slowly - it takes 1/50 of second to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > That was the dinosaur Core 2 Duo ... which later evolved into the human male. > :-) This would explain why they were so big - heat radiation of the original hot designs. SignatureJohn S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts "He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious." > Some dinosaurs had two brains! Since nerve signals move from one part > of the body to another relatively slowly - it takes 1/50 of second to > notice a pain in your foot - and since these beasts were so large, a > second brain was at the base of the tail to maintain control of the > creature's backs. Interestingly, the rear brain was bigger than the > one in their heads. - from the Animals section ofwww.odd-info.com That's nice but absolutely false. I suggest referring to more reputable sources in the future. Nick Gardner |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.