Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / September 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Electron

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Thomas Cuny - 11 Sep 2004 01:01 GMT
The electron has three quanta of charge.
How can this be since the electron is small and like
charge repels?
FrediFizzx - 11 Sep 2004 05:31 GMT
| The electron has three quanta of charge.
| How can this be since the electron is small and like
| charge repels?

Doubtful.  Maybe the real quantum of charge is +,- sqrt(hbar*c).  Then
electrons also have fractional charge of the charge quantum.  Fermions can't
be isolated from the quantum vacuum.  So the electron is really not much
different than quarks that can't be isolated.

FrediFizzx
Guck - 11 Sep 2004 11:15 GMT
> | The electron has three quanta of charge.
> | How can this be since the electron is small and like
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> FrediFizzx

Can someone give me some links to the latest theories of the electron?
If the electron is a fundamental particle with no discernable internal
structure, how does it carry a negative charge? What mechanism links
the charge to the physical mass of the electron?
Guck (marcus4767@canada.com)
FrediFizzx - 11 Sep 2004 18:08 GMT
| > | The electron has three quanta of charge.
| > | How can this be since the electron is small and like
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
| the charge to the physical mass of the electron?
| Guck (marcus4767@canada.com)

It is called the Standard Model of particle physics.  Do a google search.
You will find plenty.  IMHO, the structure of an electron is not "internal".
When you count the quantum vacuum, and you really have to, the structure is
external.

FrediFizzx
Guck - 12 Sep 2004 05:50 GMT
> | "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>  news:<2qfdubFtjqd7U1@uni-berlin.de>...
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> FrediFizzx

I have done searches on "electron" and on "particle physics" and I
have found that there are only 4 particles that make up ALL observable
detectable matter in the Universe (i.e. not counting "dark matter")-
the electron, the up quark, the down quark and the electron neutrino.
I have not come across such a cocncept as quantum vacuum for an
electron.

And if a proton is just composed of quarks and gluons, what causes
gravity in hydrogen?

Anyway, God bless you, FrediFizzx!

Guck
FrediFizzx - 12 Sep 2004 07:05 GMT
| > | "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| >  news:<2qfdubFtjqd7U1@uni-berlin.de>...
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
| I have not come across such a cocncept as quantum vacuum for an
| electron.

http://www.physics.purdue.edu/topaz/research/emagcoupl.html

| And if a proton is just composed of quarks and gluons, what causes
| gravity in hydrogen?

Between hydrogen molecules?  Basically, their mass.  Mass "tilts" the
spacetime surrounding it in such a way to make two nearby masses attract
each other.  It is described classically by Einstein's General Theory of
Relativity.

| Anyway, God bless you, FrediFizzx!

Why, thank you.

FrediFizzx
Paul Draper - 15 Sep 2004 19:37 GMT
> "Guck" <marcus4767@canada.com> wrote in message
<snip>

> | I have done searches on "electron" and on "particle physics" and I
> | have found that there are only 4 particles that make up ALL observable
> | detectable matter in the Universe (i.e. not counting "dark matter")-
> | the electron, the up quark, the down quark and the electron neutrino.
> | I have not come across such a cocncept as quantum vacuum for an
> | electron.

The universe has many more particles than this, and that reveals the
weaknesses of trying to learn things from references found on the web.

At the very least, this list ignores the particles that are the
mediators of the interactions between the above particles. Photons for
electromagnetic interaction, W & Z particles for weak interaction,
gluons for the strong interaction, gravitons for the gravitational
interaction. Call the electron, the two quarks, and the neutrino
fermions, and call the others bosons.

At an intuitive level, what a fermion is can be described by what
happens when it runs into boson. The strength of the interaction is
what we mean by "charge". So there is a "charge" associated with
interacting with a photon, another "charge" associated with
interacting with a gluon, another "charge" associated with interacting
with a graviton (which charge we sometimes call mass). If a fermion
has a "charge" value of zero of a certain kind, then it doesn't
directly interact with that boson. So far, we know that quarks
interact with photons, gluons, W&Z bosons and gravitons. Electrons
interact with photons, W&Z bosons, and gravitons. Neutrinos interact
with W&Z bosons and (until recently we thought) that's it. (Neutrinos
may interact with gravitons, as it turns out.) In a very real sense,
if a fermion were conceived that didn't interact with any boson, then
by definition it wouldn't exist!

For the experienced, I know I'm glossing over a lot. But by and large,
this gets the point across, I hope.

PD
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.