The general wavefunction for a free particle is:
Y (x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) + iA sin (kx - wt)
and the complex conjugate is:
Y*(x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) - iA sin (kx - wt)
These are multiplied together to give,along with a proportionality
constant,
the probability of finding a particle at a particular place at a
particular time.It is not known why this should be so.Here is a
suggestion:
If the wavefunction already represents a probability before it is
squared,
then multiplying it by another wavefunction - the complex conjugate -
suggests that we are dealing with the probability of two events
occurring simultaneously.This could be the probability of a mass being
in a particular place at a particular time, and something that is
equivalent to the mass being at that place at the same time.Writing
new wavefunctions Y1 and Y2:
Y1 = A cos (kx - wt), Y2 = iA sin (kx -wt)
then Y = Y1 + Y2
and Y* = Y1 - Y2
This is the kind of relation between wavefunctions that one gets
for a hydrogen molecule, for example.
Does anyone agree that the product YY* could be
telling us about two different particles in the same place at the same
time?
alistair - 23 Sep 2004 00:14 GMT
The general wavefunction for a free particle is:
Y (x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) + iA sin (kx - wt)
and the complex conjugate is:
Y*(x,t) = A cos( kx - wt) - iA sin (kx - wt)
These are multiplied together to give,along with a proportionality
constant,
the probability of finding a particle at a particular place at a
particular time.It is not known why this should be so.Here is a
suggestion:
If the wavefunction represents the sum of the square roots of two
other wavefunctions before it is squared,
then multiplying it by another wavefunction - the complex conjugate -
gives a probability.Writing:
Y1^1/2 = [A cos (kx - wt)], Y2^1/2 = [iA sin (kx -wt)]
and
Y1 + Y2 = A^2 cos (kx -wt)^2 - A^2 sin (kx - wt)^2 = A^2 [1 - 2 sin
(kx -wt)]^2
Y1 - Y2 = A^2 cos (kx -wt)^2 + A^2 sin (kx - wt)^2 = A^2
These combinations of wavefunctions happen for two bonded particles of
different mass e.g a hydrogen chloride molecule.
The second of these wavefunction combinations is constant.
So the probability of finding a particle that "bonds" (like an
electron in
hydrogen chloride)at a given distance at a given time is constant -
the particle is equally likely to be everywhere.This is not the case
where the wavefunctions were added.The question arises:is the original
particle with
wavefunction Y really a combination of at least three other particles?
Igor - 24 Sep 2004 00:02 GMT
> The general wavefunction for a free particle is:
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> telling us about two different particles in the same place at the same
> time?
Actually, the squared amplitude of the wave function defines a
probability density function. The probability of locating a particle
at any given point is not well defined, but the probability of
locating it in a particular finite region is obtained by integrating
it's squared amplitude over the volume of the region. In general, a
wave function has two parts that differ by in phase by pi/2, hence the
sine and cosine parts. But it's still only one function, having one
real squared amplitude at any given point, namely Y Y*.