Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
means) would be emitted in *all* directions preserving the topology of
the grid?
What I am interested on is on th preservation of the topology, in two
or three dimensions. This is related to my threads in sci.skeptic
about the possiblity of telepathy and the poddible proof of its
existence.
Search under `Fabrizio J Bonsignore`, sort by date (google groups)
visit ghamac.org
ghamac.org/miniface.jpg
ghamac.org/documenti/rondop.mid
ghamac.org/guitar/isabelsdeath.mp3
ghamac.org/bachiana.mid
I am Danilo J Bonsignore
Uncle Al - 31 Oct 2004 02:57 GMT
> Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> about the possiblity of telepathy and the poddible proof of its
> existence.
[snip]
"ACK! THBBFT!"
Idiot. How will you separate uplinks and downlinks for 6+ billion
people when the maximum available EEG bandwith is a piddly Project
Sanguine 45 Hz tops? Idiot. Talking gives you 1000 Hz easy.

Signature
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
jimp@specsol-spam-sux.com - 31 Oct 2004 03:02 GMT
In sci.physics Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> > Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> > particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > existence.
> [snip]
> "ACK! THBBFT!"
> Idiot. How will you separate uplinks and downlinks for 6+ billion
> people when the maximum available EEG bandwith is a piddly Project
> Sanguine 45 Hz tops? Idiot. Talking gives you 1000 Hz easy.
More like 2-3 KHz unless you're whistling morse code.

Signature
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore - 31 Oct 2004 12:44 GMT
> > Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> > particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> people when the maximum available EEG bandwith is a piddly Project
> Sanguine 45 Hz tops? Idiot. Talking gives you 1000 Hz easy.
Listen *moron*, *I* don`t like to be called idiot and there are lots
of things you don`t know. Who`s talking about bandwith? I made a
question I expect a reply to that question. You already poted this in
my other thread. Are you still advertising tortured and murdered
women? How do we know you didn`t kill her?
Bubba Smurfette - 31 Oct 2004 22:20 GMT
> > > Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> > > particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> my other thread. Are you still advertising tortured and murdered
> women? How do we know you didn`t kill her?
Idiot, Moron, your Question is meaningless crap, stuff that keyboard up your
pattuttie.
Gen Gerhard Back - 31 Oct 2004 04:11 GMT
What is a Puntual? What is a Poddible?
You have a 2 dimentional grid, what does that have to do with the 3rd
dimension?
Is 2x2 => 2 inch by 2 inch?
> Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I am Danilo J Bonsignore
^^^ TOP ^^ POSTED ^ ^ ^ ^ RESPONCE ^^^^^^^^^
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore - 31 Oct 2004 20:28 GMT
Maybe tachyons would have this property? I am trying to recall what I
read once several months ago. I expect a serious answer. To dispel my
doubts.
zegerta - 31 Oct 2004 22:15 GMT
> Maybe tachyons would have this property? I am trying to recall what I
> read once several months ago. I expect a serious answer. To dispel my
> doubts.
not Tachyons, Tomatons, that is it. They are strictly rest particles that
fit with a 2d grid.
Old Man - 31 Oct 2004 22:27 GMT
> Maybe tachyons would have this property? I am trying to recall what I
> read once several months ago. I expect a serious answer. To dispel my
> doubts.
Tachyons ? Doubts ?
Bonsignore is in need of an education to dispel his ignorance.
[Old Man]
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore - 31 Oct 2004 12:46 GMT
Would neutrinos have this property? I have this idea in my head but
right now I cannot access my references, they are in the LA library
and I am in NY.
Somma - 31 Oct 2004 22:18 GMT
> Would neutrinos have this property? I have this idea in my head but
> right now I cannot access my references, they are in the LA library
> and I am in NY.
I have some neutrinos in a bottle on my desk, you are welcome to see if they
work out.
Steve Craig - 26 Nov 2004 17:11 GMT
> Would neutrinos have this property? I have this idea in my head but
> right now I cannot access my references, they are in the LA library
> and I am in NY.
Neutrinos, once created via weak interaction, take a direction to conserve
momentum, so its trajectory is dependent on the relative trajectory (ies) of
the incident particle(s).
As well Neutrinos interact with next to nothing, so they aren't very good at
relaying detailed information, unless you have a 1000 metric tons of
deuterated water lying around.
For example, in 1987 a Type II supernova went of in the LMC (Large
Magellinic Cloud [1]). The estimated neutrino energy output for all species
of neutrino was estimated to be 99.9% of the gravational binding energy of
the created neutron star, which is roughly ~10^51 ergs. (which is quite a
lot). Here on earth, with the Kamiokande neutrino observatory, we detected
8 neutrinos.
Steve
Billy Joe Redneck - 31 Oct 2004 20:02 GMT
Dear Moron:
There are no particles.
Now get buggered sideways on Mars by rabid sea urchins, and never post here
again.
> Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I am Danilo J Bonsignore
James Koepke - 31 Oct 2004 22:08 GMT
> Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
> means) would be emitted in *all* directions preserving the topology of
> the grid?
Learn some physics, Idiot.
Each and every particle has a momentum vector. A single
particle can't be emitted in a spherically or cylindrically
symmetric fashion. Only via statistics can a large number
of particles be said to have a symmetric emission distribution.
With respect to its source, total angular momentum, j = 0,
is absolutely forbidden for a single photon. A plane wave
isn't symmetric.
[Old Man]
... snip cracked pottery ...
> I am Danilo J Bonsignore
Old Man - 31 Oct 2004 22:21 GMT
> Imagine we have a grid of 2x2 of puntual sources. Is there any
> particle or family of particles that once generated (by whatever
> means) would be emitted in *all* directions preserving the topology of
> the grid?
Learn some physics, Idiot.
Each and every particle has a momentum vector. A single
particle can't be emitted in a spherically or cylindrically
symmetric fashion. Only via statistics can a large number
of particles be said to have a symmetric emission distribution.
With respect to its source, total angular momentum, j = 0,
is absolutely forbidden for a single photon. A plane wave
isn't symmetric.
[Old Man]
... snip cracked pottery ...
> I am Danilo J Bonsignore