Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / December 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Two universes - one made of antimatter, one of  matter

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
alistair@goforit64.fsnet.co.uk - 10 Dec 2004 13:22 GMT
A universe made of positive matter would repel a universe
made of negative matter.These two universes would need some attractive
force to make them oscillate towards and away from one  another.A
constant number of vacuum particles in and around,and joining the
universes together, would emit energy as space expands (to account for
the observed geometry of the universe).When it has emitted all the
energy of its excited states the vacuum would start reabsorbing energy
again and the universes would move together again as space contracts.
In the positive mass universe a charge surrounded by mass-causing
particles (magnetic particles?)and moving through space
would compress mass-causing particles in front of it (magnetic
particles?).Behind the charge a gap would form in the mass-causing
particles and this would have to be filled by energy
emitted by vacuum particles, or the charge would slow down because
of the pressure difference.So, in this scenario,a charge moving through
space causes the emission of energy from the vacuum.
If some of this energy becomes new charges then their movement
will cause even more energy to be emitted from the vacuum per unit time
and the expansion of the universe will accelerate.The same mechanism
would apply to the negative mass antimatter universe too.
alistair@goforit64.fsnet.co.uk - 10 Dec 2004 18:18 GMT
If inflation of the universe had taken place more slowly then the
relative abundances of the light elements would be expected to be
different.
However,if mass is caused by a finite number of mass-causing particles,
and these can exist
inside and outside a ball of proton,electrons  etc.
present at the start of the universe, then
when the ball was small there would be fewer
mass-causing particles per charge in the ball
(not enough room for as many),
and so the mass and energy of charges in the ball
would have been less.There would have been fewer
hydrogen atoms with sufficient energy to form
helium atoms by fusion and so a slower expansion
would have been needed  to keep the relative abundances of the elements
the same by giving
hydrogen atoms with sufficient energy  more time to combine.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.