 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / February 2005The Eel ' or 'Snake' Model for particles.
I would like to prsent in somwhat a mathaphoric way my understanding and my findings about the Eel model or if you like the 'snake model' as far as the poor tool of asci is alowing me ..... \ /\ \/\/ \ / \ \ / \ \/ \ Oh Ghosh what a pain in the neck tool (:-) now i didnt cntuimue with a stll bigger in radius but smaller in mass chin of orbitals that comes next because i am too lazy yet i hope the patiant reader can read what i mean now some corection to that imposible sci tool 1 those 'bars' that you see are not jut lines but symbolize an cirle orbilat ie actuall 3D structre 2 the angle between the folowing 'bars' is not about 30 deg as the asci lets me do but immagine 150 degrees instead ie a much more longitudinally 'flatter' structure now3 what is the innovation in it and what are its advantages: the innovationis that no one before could immagine or suggest that orbitals can join *linearily*! 2 it explaines the 'string' model that so many people feel is lacking so much and is very poweful in exlaining many of the contardictions in the existing dominalt paradigma like how can say an electron be a point particle and at the same time be 'wave behaving' not to mention my nuclear and atomic Model that fite perfectly to that base asumption 3 explaines (in unserstatment) much better say the 'generation of particvles ' phenomena ie how is it that particles can belong to the nuclear and electronic family as well ie the hybrid nature of many particles 4 explaines nicely the famous 'Zoo' of particles ie how is it that there is such a huge number of particles and subparticles etc etc. and that is only the 'tip of the iceberg' once a serious discussion will be open and while that model will be whidly exposed it will reveal its real power (as i am sure and hope) that is of course a suggestion, a good one i firmly beleieve. due to long experience with it. that hs too many indication that cannot be ignored. now that thread is not for parrots and not for proffesional crooks, personal politiciance, nor personal politiciance.(that are unfortunately too abundant here.- to abundat in the noice they make around themselves pompous chest drumming on others chests proffesional herring spreaders etc etc.) TIA Y.Porat ----------------------- [snip] > yet i hope the patiant reader can read what i mean > now some corection to that imposible sci tool I am a very patient reader, but since I can already see that you are trying to sell horse dung, I won't waste any further patience on you. [snip] Franz No one waas sking old farters like you and disturbed Uncle Al to respond it is not for you you are old crook farters the only innovation you did in your life is trhe Fertz innovation ie an em wave that has one cycle per year!! the only innovation that the other croock was creating diamonds fo rsaving the worlds economy so just piss of!! in my last remark i explcitly noted that this is not for old farters like you anyway i will try and correct the figure thre problem with it is that our Google editor takes for itself the liberty to change order of lines as they think should economize lines, yet if makes it complicated to insert an asci figure even if very abstract anyway may be i will try to correct it by some trick- may be 2 th wefigure itself is not the only thing i brough tthere there is beyond the figure. much beyond old dumb croocks ability to get. Y.Porat ----------------------------- Y.Porat ----------------------------- No one waas sking old farters like you and disturbed Uncle Al to respond it is not for you you are old crook farters the only innovation you did in your life is trhe Fertz innovation ie an em wave that has one cycle per year!! the only innovation that the other croock was creating diamonds fo rsaving the worlds economy so just piss of!! in my last remark i explcitly noted that this is not for old farters like you anyway i will try and correct the figure thre problem with it is that our Google editor takes for itself the liberty to change order of lines as they think should economize lines, yet if makes it complicated to insert an asci figure even if very abstract anyway may be i will try to correct it by some trick- may be 2 th wefigure itself is not the only thing i brough tthere there is beyond the figure. much beyond old dumb croocks ability to get. Y.Porat ----------------------------- Y.Porat ----------------------------- let me see if i can after all create and insert here and asci figure: /\ /\ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa / \ / \ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \/\/\/ \ / \ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa \/ \ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a test to insert an asci figure with the Google editor---------------------------------------- Y.Porat ps excuse ne if it failes any technical suggestions ??? TIA Y.Porat sory it does not work so i will put it in words: just imagine a zigzag line folowed on the same line by another zigzag line but with bigger lines and then another one with even bigger zigzag lines thats all. that is symbolically the chain of orbitals any thechnical suggetions will be appreciated the rest text is the same. Tia Y.Porat ------------------------------ an unexpectet help came to me from Franklinhu who shared a corner of his site to my abstract pdf file so it goes (something like this (:-) if not mistyping) http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/Y.Porat-model2.pdf so at the beginning of that file i show schmatically 3d the structure of the alpha particle in my model that is my biggest 'zoom' into my alpha undestnading later it becomes less 'zoomed' and more abstractly presentd iow mor esymbolic just inorder of saving time space etc. now at this alpha particle presentationyou can get the general notion of my idea about the * 'chin of orbitals* ie a proton or neotron are presented there as a chin of small links connected linearily that series of circles is just the nucleid linearikly to it the links become bigger in radius to make the 'medium' orbital and later still linearily the electron conneted to the medium links the electron in that case is just symbolically presentd as a dotted line yet that is in general the graphic symbol presentation that i could not make with the asci tool so a tanks to Franklin b i hope that will give me a tool to have more common language with other members. all the best Y.Porat --------------------------- soty about th espelling mistake in my last article instead of 'chin of orbitals' it should be 'Chain of orbitals' (thats on of the the new ideas) Y.Porat -------------------- > I would like to prsent in somwhat a mathaphoric way > my understanding and my findings about the > > Eel model or if you like the 'snake model' as far > as the poor tool of asci is alowing me ..... [snip] Spamming diidot. You've alredy postd your crap and had it shoved back down your throat. Here, have a second helping, <http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf> http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html <http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html> <http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html>  SignatureUncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.