Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dummy indices in Wave packet equation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Zinc Potterman - 16 May 2005 10:13 GMT
In my quantum mechanics text book it states that if the normalisation
condition for a wave
packet Psi made of a superposition of states is

Psi*Psi=1

then the two occurences of Psi necessitate two different dummy indices in
the sum.
m amd n for example.
Is this a general thing in maths that if a function contains a sum then a
product of that function (with its complex conjugate in this case)requires 2
separate indices.
Regards
Zinc
Signature

zincnews123@tiscali.c123o.u123k
To reply to address don't click.
Cut and paste, then delete
all digits

------------------------------------

Jon Bell - 16 May 2005 13:29 GMT
>Is this a general thing in maths that if a function contains a sum then a
>product of that function (with its complex conjugate in this case)requires 2
>separate indices.

Yes.  To see this, simply write out the sum(s) and perform the indicated
multiplication.  Use a a small, finite number of terms in the sum to make
the algebra manageable.  For example, let f = f_1 + f_2 + f_3.  Then

f*f = (f_1 + f_2 + f_3)*(f_1 + f_2 + f_3)

f*f =   f_1*f_1 + f_1*f_2 + f_1*f_3
     + f_2*f_1 + f_2*f_2 + f_2*f_3
     + f_3*f_1 + f_3*f_2 + f_3*f_3

Writing the product using f in summation form, if you try to use a single
index you get

f*f = sum(f_n*f_n)

f*f = f_1*f_1 + f_2*f_2 + f_3*f_3

which is very different from what I wrote above.  On the other hand if you
have two indices, that indicates a "double sum" (even though we may write
it as a single summation for brevity):

f*f = sum over m (sum over n (f_m*f_n))

f*f = sum over m (f_m*f_1 + f_m*f_2 + f_m*f_3)

f*f =   f_1*f_1 + f_1*f_2 + f_1*f_3
     + f_2*f_1 + f_2*f_2 + f_2*f_3
     + f_3*f_1 + f_3*f_2 + f_3*f_3

which is what I wrote first above.

Signature

Jon Bell <jtbell@presby.edu>                        Presbyterian College
Dept. of Physics and Computer Science        Clinton, South Carolina USA

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.