Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Does the HUP prevents us from knowing geometric properties of the nuc.?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Y.Porat - 24 May 2005 05:44 GMT
my question is as in the title
Does HUP prevents us from knowing any geometric property
of the NUC.???

TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Old Man - 24 May 2005 07:40 GMT
> my question is as in the title
> Does HUP prevents us from knowing any geometric property
> of the NUC.???

Geometry ?  One can measure a nuclear scattering
cross-section to a degree limited only by the
funding.  HUP has naught to do with it (cross-
section is transverse to beam particle momentum).

[Old Man]

> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------------
Y.Porat - 24 May 2005 08:43 GMT
how about mutual location of nucleids??

Y.P
----------------------------------------
Y.Porat - 26 May 2005 06:08 GMT
if there is no answer
we may conclude that the answer is NO

the HUP cannt prevent us from knowing geometric properties of the nuc
and not of the Atom as well

all the best
Y.Porat
-------------------------------------
PD - 26 May 2005 15:51 GMT
> how about mutual location of nucleids??
>
> Y.P
> ----------------------------------------

How about you come up with a model that shows the mutual location of
blood cells in the human body?
They're *moving*, Porat.
What makes you think there is, or needs to be, some stable geometry of
nucleons?

PD
Y.Porat - 26 May 2005 16:09 GMT
for starters (just in my innovations- it is not your fault that you are
not yet familiar with it)

so lets take a simple example for starters:

take the Deutron nuc
it is composed of Proton and neutron right??
just the two of them thats why it is simple.

so may we say that the proton and neutron ther are
*located one next to the other ?*

i heared some smartying trying to object even such a simple
understanding
but if you dont waht to be too much a 'smartguy'
can we say the above ??
is that geomertric property of the deutron??

TIA
Y.Porat
----------------------------
η ταχύτητα του φωτός - 26 May 2005 20:45 GMT
protons, neutrons and stuff are only models, you fool, in absentia of
somthn better

you want to determine their position with respect to what?
Y.Porat - 27 May 2005 05:39 GMT
with each other idiot !!!
what is that funy name of yourse??

must you complicate the simlest things
waht is more simple then the structire of deutron
to have a proton and neutron side by side???!!!
how can we do dome advance with fuickers like you ???
Y.Porat
----------------------------
Y.Porat - 27 May 2005 08:00 GMT
what is more logic
stable geometry of a porridge of particles
is that podidge what is governing your thinking??

btw i noticed some cute behaviour of yourse:
once you think that you can refute me
you are ready to get in
but once you realise that i am going to get some point
you disapear
simple conclusion:
you are predetermined of not leting me get any credit!!
is there something motre simple than to say that
in the Deutron nuc-
proton and neutron are located side by side??!!!!!

have you heared about 'intellectual integrity in scince'???
i dont expect you to hear about it in politics!
neither personal politics !!!!.........
keep well
Y.Porat
--------------------------
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.