Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is this empirical expression accurate?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jpsmith123@yahoo.com - 24 May 2005 14:34 GMT
Hello,

While looking at a patent recently, I came across the following simple
expression for the range (R) of an energetic electron in the atmosphere
(at sea level pressure):

R = 543*E - 106

Where R is in centimeters and E is in Mev. The patent refers to this
formula as "Feather's rule", and stipulates that it's valid for 2.5 Mev
< E < 20 Mev.

I'm wondering, has anyone else heard of this expression? Is it fairly
accurate?

Regards,
Joe
Mike Yarwood - 25 May 2005 01:35 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I'm wondering, has anyone else heard of this expression? Is it fairly
> accurate?

If you look at equation 7 in this
http://www.eas.asu.edu/~holbert/eee460/IonizationRange.pdf

they attribute it to katz and penfold.
I've not double checked but the two sources seem to disagree by a factor of
only around 1.3

best of luck - mike
jpsmith123@yahoo.com - 25 May 2005 04:08 GMT
Hi Mike,

Thanks for that!

Regards,
Joe

> > Hello,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> best of luck - mike
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.