Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / May 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Has this equation got a name?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Golden Boar - 28 May 2005 16:22 GMT
Has this equation got a name?

aG = G.m^2 / hbar.c

where,

aG = gravitaional equivalent of fine structure constant
G = Gravitaional constant
m = mass
hbar = Planck's constant / 2.pi
c = speed of light in vacuum
Golden Boar - 28 May 2005 18:07 GMT
aG, btw, is what I am suggesting this value is, since it is basically
the same as the equation used to calculate the fine structure
constant,eg,

a = kC.e^2 / hbar.c

where,

kC = coulomb constant
e = charge of electron
hbar = Planck's constant / 2.pi
c = speed of light in vacuum
FrediFizzx - 28 May 2005 18:51 GMT
| Has this equation got a name?
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| hbar = Planck's constant / 2.pi
| c = speed of light in vacuum

You must have been reading my mind. ;-)  This would be the
"gravitational coupling equation" if there is a mass quantum where m =
such mass quantum.  However, there may not be a mass quantum so that
presents difficulties.  If we plug in 1eV/c^2 (neutrino mass?) as the
mass quantum, we get ~ 6.71 x 10^-57 as the gravitational coupling
constant.  Very very weak.

Now let's paste in part of your other message.

"aG, btw, is what I am suggesting this value is, since it is basically
the same as the equation used to calculate the fine structure
constant,eg,

a = kC.e^2 / hbar.c"

This is also the "basic" form for weak coupling and strong coupling
where kC would be replaced by an appropriate proportionality factor and
e by "weak charge" and strong charge.  Unfortunately, all the couplings
vary with "energy level" so the actual coupling equations are not this
simplistic.

If there is no mass quantum, then I suspect that somehow electric, weak
and strong work together to make a gravitational coupling constant in
conjunction with the geometry of their interactions.  If extra compact
dimensions are a reality, then it gets pretty complicated.

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.