aG, btw, is what I am suggesting this value is, since it is basically
the same as the equation used to calculate the fine structure
constant,eg,
a = kC.e^2 / hbar.c
where,
kC = coulomb constant
e = charge of electron
hbar = Planck's constant / 2.pi
c = speed of light in vacuum
| Has this equation got a name?
|
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
| hbar = Planck's constant / 2.pi
| c = speed of light in vacuum
You must have been reading my mind. ;-) This would be the
"gravitational coupling equation" if there is a mass quantum where m =
such mass quantum. However, there may not be a mass quantum so that
presents difficulties. If we plug in 1eV/c^2 (neutrino mass?) as the
mass quantum, we get ~ 6.71 x 10^-57 as the gravitational coupling
constant. Very very weak.
Now let's paste in part of your other message.
"aG, btw, is what I am suggesting this value is, since it is basically
the same as the equation used to calculate the fine structure
constant,eg,
a = kC.e^2 / hbar.c"
This is also the "basic" form for weak coupling and strong coupling
where kC would be replaced by an appropriate proportionality factor and
e by "weak charge" and strong charge. Unfortunately, all the couplings
vary with "energy level" so the actual coupling equations are not this
simplistic.
If there is no mass quantum, then I suspect that somehow electric, weak
and strong work together to make a gravitational coupling constant in
conjunction with the geometry of their interactions. If extra compact
dimensions are a reality, then it gets pretty complicated.
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps