Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / June 2005

Wesley,

Thanks for the prompt and intelligent reply. I, myself, am into a new
type of physics called: "Reality Physics" where time is very real, the
reasoning goes like this: You say: ", a line between two points is a
concept. The line does not exist, but the two points, which lets say
are two people, exists". > I say: "the line repersents a REAL PHYSICAL
DISTANCE between the two points, let's say two people [you and I]. If
the line (DISTANCE) wasn't there, we would be next to each other, but
we are not, so the distance (or line) between us IS physically real,
much more than just a concept, since concepts are NOT physically real,
and cannot put real physical distance between people. The passing of
time has to be physically real to continually create the real distance
covered by the clock's hands as they physically rotate around the
clock's face. Would you consider the actual, physical  distance covered
by the clock's hands as only a "concept", or something physically real?

In Reality Physics, the background referernce of the universe has
always existed, and will always exist, and is infinitely large. Our
"Big Bang" is just one of the small ripples in a very large pond.

The website for Reality Physics is:     > www.realityphysics.com <
if you are interested.

all the best,

Jeff Lee   CENTER for REALITY PHYSICS