who is 'Auty' ??!!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Y.Porat - 31 Aug 2005 07:13 GMT We meet lately a strange agressive nagging creature that calls itself Auty'
there is no real name no clear country or institute identity!!
which is a good starting sign of dishonesty and lack of integrity.
ie mainly personal politics motiveted and not *science motivated*
can someone take of the mask from that crookish creature?? including what country or institute he/she belongs ??
imho such a reveal will make this ng something more valuable and respectable .
TIA Y.Porat --------------
Autymn D. C. - 31 Aug 2005 09:48 GMT Auty is one of your projected delusions, spawned from your own failure as a contributing member to these newsgroups.
Y.Porat - 31 Aug 2005 10:12 GMT yes a very nice self estimate
does your woman think the same (:-)
lets hear other opinions
Y.P ------------------------
Y.Porat - 01 Sep 2005 07:36 GMT Carlos wrote :
quote:
18. Carlos L Sep 1, 2:41 am show options
Newsgroups: sci.physics From: "Carlos L" <carlo...@lix.intercom.es> - Find messages by this author Date: 31 Aug 2005 17:41:34 -0700 Local: Thurs, Sep 1 2005 2:41 am Subject: Re: Does the earth slow down? Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse
> can someone of the members here > reveal > from which country Auty is ?? Not his "country of origin" but there is a high probability that Auty is posting from Stockton, CA, US (since his Posting Host seems to be located there).
(Since he posts directly with Goggle Groups, his NNTP-Posting-Host appears in the heading of the "Original Message" option. It is 69.108.172.162 Then if you go to: http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm?GetLocation and input that IP number you get the location information).
end of quote
than you Carlos let anyone know who is Autmn yet that is only partial knowledge
and still the rest has to be found IE what is that 'personality to what organization it belongs
and more important what is the real real motivations of that creature and why hiding his real identity? ---------------------
TIA Y.Porat ----------------
-
Y.Porat - 01 Sep 2005 07:42 GMT now the 'get location' does not work on my computer can someone get it??
TIA Y.Porat ------------------------
Josie Margolis - 01 Sep 2005 17:27 GMT I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She signs herself as "Aut". She thinks that she's highly intelligent just because she had early experiences winning spelling bees. She can throw around scientific jargon glibly, but many of her posts are communication failures in the sense that other people often can't understand what she's saying. She considers this communication failure to be the fault of the reader, but of course the fault is in the writing, which tends to include incomplete sentences, question fragments such as "Why?" or "How?" in an ambiguous context, pronouns with unclear references, and not giving enough background information to let other people know what she's talking about.
When she's angry she tosses about unimaginative name-calling like a twelve years old, but I think she's probably in her twenties, merely too unskilled to come up with anything better to say.
She has a serious misunderstanding of the scientific method, the academic process, and the general human endeavor to seek the truth. She sees the world in a distorted black and white "I'm right -- You're a retard" that just doesn't fit the evidence. Even Wikipedia won't put up with her atrocious behavior and lack of respect for opinions that differ from her own.
She has no qualms about expressing her vulgar personal prejudices against Jews, homosexuals, people from other countries, and people from other parts of her own country. Unfortunately she's also an outspoken atheist who gives a bad name to all of the decent atheists out there. She makes me ashamed to be a female American.
No doubt her reply will be that she hates us and wants us to "stop making things up". But there isn't any need to "make things up" since she condemns herself with her own posts.
Hee spelling corrections are merely annoying. Apparently she doesn't believe in using "ph", an eccentricity that might be considered charming in less obnoxious person.
> now > the 'get location' [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Y.Porat > ------------------------ Josie Margolis - 01 Sep 2005 17:34 GMT I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She signs herself as "Aut". She thinks that she's highly intelligent just because she had early experiences winning spelling bees. She can throw around scientific jargon glibly, but many of her posts are communication failures in the sense that other people often can't understand what she's saying. She considers this communication failure to be the fault of the reader, but of course the fault is in the writing, which tends to include incomplete sentences, question fragments such as "Why?" or "How?" in an ambiguous context, pronouns with unclear references, and not giving enough background information to let other people know what she's talking about.
When she's angry she tosses about unimaginative name-calling like a twelve year old, but I think she's probably in her twenties, merely too unskilled to come up with anything better to say.
She has a serious misunderstanding of the scientific method, the academic process, and the general human endeavor to seek the truth. She sees the world in a distorted black and white "I'm right -- You're a retard" that just doesn't fit the evidence. Even Wikipedia won't put up with her atrocious behavior and lack of respect for opinions that differ from her own.
She has no qualms about expressing her vulgar personal prejudices against Jews, homosexuals, people from other countries, and people from other parts of her own country. Unfortunately she's also an outspoken atheist who gives a bad name to all of the decent atheists out there. She makes me ashamed to be a female American.
No doubt her reply will be that she hates us and wants us to "stop making things up". But there isn't any need to "make things up" since she condemns herself with her own posts.
Hee spelling corrections are merely annoying. Apparently she doesn't believe in using "ph", an eccentricity that might be considered charming in less obnoxious person.
> now > the 'get location' [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Y.Porat > ------------------------ Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors - 01 Sep 2005 17:53 GMT > I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her > gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She signs herself as [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > believe in using "ph", an eccentricity that might be considered > charming in less obnoxious person. IAWTP.
I suspect she's in her late twenties, even though she acts in a profoundly immature manner, and that she derives sexual pleasure from pointing out typos (and from nothing else, I'd wager).
Here she gets banned from a forum for being such a pain in the a.s:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/transparentscreens/discuss/23737/
It's kinda funny, IMO. lol.
-- http://cherenkov-radiation.blogspot.com/
Josie Margolis - 01 Sep 2005 18:39 GMT Sexual pleasure from pointing out typos? A questionable hypothesis I think, but then again maybe I've been doing it incorrectly all these years. Ego and boredom probably present a simpler explanation.
> > I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her > > gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She signs herself as [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > -- > http://cherenkov-radiation.blogspot.com/ Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors - 01 Sep 2005 19:02 GMT > Sexual pleasure from pointing out typos? A questionable hypothesis I > think, but then again maybe I've been doing it incorrectly all these > years. Ego and boredom probably present a simpler explanation. It's just a theory, but I posit that she has a typo-correction-fetish, and has become very adept at posting said corrections using only one hand.
-- http://cherenkov-radiation.blogspot.com/
Y.Porat - 01 Sep 2005 18:02 GMT Hi Josi!! if you are a woman you saved the Honor of women!!
i very nice character analysis!! now lets hear Auty how she responds to all those accusations that seems to be very justified.
it didnt took me too long to realize with whom i am dealing. now the most annoying part of it is her vast participation in any thread there is a saying in our place:
'what is worse than a fool'?? answer - a diligent fool !!!' now about her hatred for the 'strangers' i noticed it clearly!!
there fore i used not too happily the word Nazi. i felt it.... IE the unconditional irrational hatred. IE intellectual integrity is not in her dirt any way i am glad that we took of the mask of her face so anyone can know with whom we are dealing in this serious ng IE there is no room for such a behavior
for instance i indicated that while the price of oil is 70 $ and up wards it is lack of intelligence to deal with spelling in this ng!! etc etc etc .
so thanks Josie
and ATB Y.Porat ------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 02 Sep 2005 01:45 GMT Shitheaded Porat: didnt took -> didn't take
Josie: You can't prove a damned thing you said. You can't tell the difference between a sentence and an interjection. You can't answer where I said that I was a third the age of some people here; or that I used to battle religious racists including Christian Identity cultists, who /did/ attack Jews without reason; or where all of my namecalling is accurate and descriptive given that the other party can't write without being a liar. Nor do you give a damn about linguistic accuracy, that you think corruptions like "ph" is acceptable. Nor do you about scientific accuracy, that you might defend the mistakes the establishment has made, whose page-long list of grievances I conveniently posted herebelow: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free_energy/message/17865. You are nothing but a coward-supporting liar like Porat.
-Aut
Y.Porat - 02 Sep 2005 06:22 GMT OK from now on i will know that i am a coward and a lier
now about the little pisser Aut
you are a proved lier in your latest posts you said that you are third the age of many posters here
anyone can follow it and realize
so you even suffer form lack of memory or selective memory
not to mention your lies and lack of intelligence about the 'Gold - Platinum' process
that is one of the properties of a little disturbed Nazi. that is wasting the precious time of this ng and is a walking damage.
Y.Porat ----------------------
Autymn D. C. - 02 Sep 2005 08:43 GMT > OK from now on i will know that i am > a coward and a lier You're too retarded to know what lier or i means.
> you are a proved lier > in your latest posts you said that you are > third the age of many posters here Yes, I lie in bed as I post.
> so you even suffer form lack of memory > or selective memory I'm not a hard drive or chip.
> not to mention your lies and lack of intelligence about the > 'Gold - Platinum' process nonexistent
> that is one of the properties of a little disturbed Nazi. that is > wasting the precious time of this > ng > and is a walking damage. It is of you.
-Aut
Y.Porat - 02 Sep 2005 11:26 GMT lets hear what others say
Y.Porat ----------------------
donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 02 Sep 2005 11:58 GMT lets hear what others say
******************
OK.
"My water heater's been giving trouble lately"
Hope that helps.
Carlos L - 03 Sep 2005 19:30 GMT Hi Porat:
I've reached the conclusion that Auty likes you. (Or is it Josie that she likes?). Otherwise, why would she leave in her earlier post a trace so that you can find more about her? Because if you go to the URL that she gave you: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/free_energy/message/17865 you'll find at the bottom a broken link (that you can fix) and jump to 3 pages with plenty of juicy information about her. If you like ducks you are a fortunate man because, you know, she believes that in her earlier life "she was a duck". Good luck.
Carlos L
john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com - 03 Sep 2005 20:13 GMT > I've reached the conclusion that Auty likes you. (Or is it Josie > that she likes?). Otherwise, why would she leave in her earlier [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > you'll find at the bottom a broken link (that you can fix) and > jump to 3 pages with plenty of juicy information about her. And that about.com site in turn has a link, marked "Visit website", to a site http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EsotericWorldNews/ where there's a photo of a lady who in most respects roughly matches the personal details given at the about.com site, although it's hard to be sure as the image desn't include her entire figure and its quality isn't perfect, and the hair colour doesn't match for any real values of tan.
Autymn D. C. - 05 Sep 2005 03:42 GMT John, you fool, that's a picture of the EWN owner. I only posted there for awhile, a long while.
Autymn D. C. - 05 Sep 2005 03:48 GMT And I would never be that old or ugly, you illiterate liar.
Y.Porat - 05 Sep 2005 07:09 GMT and where from is your Hebrew knowledge??
TIA Y.Porat -----------------------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 05 Sep 2005 09:56 GMT why?
Y.Porat - 05 Sep 2005 17:15 GMT because it is very rare that 'an American' will know Hebrew !! (Hebrew is a language of about 4 thousand years.) it is based on those people who lived in 'Mesopotamia' (somewhere in todays Iraq ) and were called 'The Habiru' they were very punctual about writing not like me (:-) ----------------
ATB Y.Porat --------------------------
josiemargolis@aol.com - 05 Sep 2005 20:55 GMT I think that there are several people who've heard about the Golem story without necessarily knowing how to speak Hebrew or being any sort of expert on the subject of the ancient Hebrews. It's something that a person might (or might not)come across while reading about the history of science fiction and the subject of man-made life forms (the Frankenstein story, artificial intelligence, etc.)
I'm not sure that it makes a particularly good insult, however.
> because it is very rare that 'an American' > will know Hebrew !! [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Y.Porat > -------------------------- Robert J. Kolker - 06 Sep 2005 01:39 GMT > because it is very rare that 'an American' > will know Hebrew !! Several million do and not just Jews. As languages go, it is not all that hard to learn, once one gets past the alphabet.
Bob Kolker
Y.Porat - 06 Sep 2005 05:12 GMT yet for me as a native Israeli it sometimes enough to hear just one word to know with whom i am dealind ......
2 even if you are right her interest in Hebrew and knowledge of it has some meaning to me that seems not relevant to others but is relevant to me . explanations later ......
ATB Y.Porat -----------------------
Autymn D. C. - 06 Sep 2005 09:32 GMT > because it is very rare that 'an American' > will know Hebrew !! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > they were very punctual about writing > not like me (:-) Josie is right for once, about the language not being relevant to my knowing. I just know about golems from Nethack and then looked it up. However, my middle name is Hebrew for bee, which is quite right on.
-Aut
Y.Porat - 06 Sep 2005 09:39 GMT what is Net hack??
your middle name is Hebrew for bee?? please elaborate?? so are you a Jew??
TIA Y.Porat ---------------
Autymn D. C. - 06 Sep 2005 09:48 GMT > what is Net hack?? I said Nethack.
> your middle name is Hebrew for bee?? > please elaborate?? > so are you a Jew?? No, retard.
-Aut
Y.Porat - 06 Sep 2005 10:22 GMT so why did it took you so long to bring that 'story' of Nethack??
tell us the truth were from your Hebrew knowledge is !! Y.Porat --------------------------
josiemargolis@aol.com - 06 Sep 2005 19:57 GMT > so why did it took you so long to bring that 'story' of Nethack?? > > tell us the truth were from your Hebrew knowledge is !! > Y.Porat > -------------------------- I think you're on the wrong track here, as I was wrong when I jumped to the conclusion that Autymn was anti-Jewish based on a post that turned out to have been written by someone else. True, the world is full of anti-Semites and some of these people are secretly Jews who are ashamed of their own Jewish heritage, but there isn't any evidence indicating that Autymn is one of these people.
Besides, what difference does it make? I would think that most Jews who are proud of their heritage would sleep better at night if they believed that Autymn's ethnic origin was Scottish-Welsh-German or some other such combination that America tends to view as melting pot vanilla. Then again, maybe the Scots, Welsh, and Germans don't want her either.
Take my word for it, lots of non-Jewish people have heard of the word "golem" (such as JRR Tolkein.) I think that Autymn just looked at the ".il" on your e-mail address and went fishing for something Israeli to use in an insult. It certainly fits her pattern.
Also, plenty of Americans have names from the Bible (such as Deborah), and a person interested in spelling and linguistics would of course have looked up her name to see the language origin and meaning.
Autymn D. C. - 07 Sep 2005 10:23 GMT did it took -> did it take
retard
john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com - 06 Sep 2005 12:09 GMT > However, my middle name is Hebrew for bee, which is quite right on. Deborah, right?
See http://www.behindthename.com/twins.php
Y.Porat - 04 Sep 2005 05:25 GMT so what is that information i think it becomes more interesting since she becomes a pain in the neck for too many people here. 2 i am interested to know whether she belongs to some institute (or may be a gang....?) TIA Y.Porat -------------------------
josiemargolis@aol.com - 05 Sep 2005 18:45 GMT > so what is that information > i think it becomes more interesting since she becomes a pain in the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Y.Porat > ------------------------- What scientific institute would accept someone who believes that falling objects travel in elliptical paths rather than parabolic paths? (see below)
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Autymn D. C. > Date: 4 Sep 2005 21:41:38 -0700 > Subject: Re: Inter group puzzler
>> Herc wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> >> Herc
> Based on what? How did you standardise this? By the way, the balls > /do not/ move in parabolic curves (scientific lige) but in [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > -Aut josiemargolis@aol.com - 03 Sep 2005 02:31 GMT > <snipped> > > Josie: You can't prove a damned thing you said. > <snipped> > > -Aut Well let's see. This could take a long time, so let's start off small. How about where I said that you are prejudiced against people from other countries? Here's a recent post of yours:
> From: Autymn D. C. > Date: 1 Sep 2005 21:07:14 -0700 > Subject: Re: Does the earth slow down? Carlos L wrote:
>> Not his "country of origin" but there is a high probability that Auty >> is posting from Stockton, CA, US (since his Posting Host seems to be >> located there).
> /her/, shithead. This coming from a Spanish dumbass who thinks that > "autumnus" translates into "otoño" and who can't even tell the sex of > an English name.
> -Aut How would the average person interpret the above remark of yours?
1. You intended the phrase "Spanish dumbass" to be an ethnic slur against Spanish people;
or
2. You intended the "dumbass" as a slur but the word "Spanish" was neutrally included so that readers would understand which dumbass you were talking about.
I vote for option 1. Is it proof? No. Is it evidence? In my opinion, yes.
Autymn D. C. - 03 Sep 2005 02:38 GMT Josie the failed lawyer, I was talking about languages. So Spanish as an ethnic determiner is off-subject. Also, you do not know what prejudiced means: I have never spoken out of prejudice, but of postjudice. Where I argue, you cannot win.
-Aut
josiemargolis@aol.com - 03 Sep 2005 17:47 GMT > Josie the failed lawyer, I was talking about languages. So Spanish as > an ethnic determiner is off-subject. Also, you do not know what > prejudiced means: I have never spoken out of prejudice, but of > postjudice. Where I argue, you cannot win. Lawyer? Does the word "evidence" make you think only of legality? Most people reading a physics newsgroup would assume that the use of the word "evidence" was a metaphor chosen in reference to observations presented to support a hypothesis. It was an attempt to present an analogy to the scientific method (but only an analogy since the subject is not science. You demanded proof, but absolute proof is not really how knowledge works unless the discussion is understood to take place within the realm of a field of study that has accepted axioms. Weighing the evidence is the best that we can do in the real world.
Regarding your "Spanish dumbass" comment: Linguistic chauvinism is no less repugnant than ethnic chauvinism, so what's your point? Let's look at this one...
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Autymn D. C. Date: 16 Jul 2005 14:43:26 -0700 Subject: Re: 7 articles published in a single year...wow!
> Here's a message to all illiterate Commonwealthlings out there: It's > /haven't/ a clue, and crap is a NOUN, not an adjective, which is > /crappy/. > -Aut Is this supposed to be a slur against people from countries in the British Commonwealth?
And have you ever considered the question of your inappropriate use of the word "retard" is a noun rather than a verb?
Autymn D. C. - 06 Sep 2005 09:48 GMT > Lawyer? Does the word "evidence" make you think only of legality? > Most people reading a physics newsgroup would assume that the use of > the word "evidence" was a metaphor chosen in reference to observations > presented to support a hypothesis. It was an attempt to present an The laws of man or of world are still laws. It is fit to call any debater using evidence a lawyer.
> analogy to the scientific method (but only an analogy since the subject > is not science. You demanded proof, but absolute proof is not really > how knowledge works unless the discussion is understood to take place > within the realm of a field of study that has accepted axioms. > Weighing the evidence is the best that we can do in the real world. I didn't say anything about absolute proof.
> Regarding your "Spanish dumbass" comment: Linguistic chauvinism is no > less repugnant than ethnic chauvinism, so what's your point? Let's > look at this one... http://dictionary.com/search?q=chauvinism
Hmm, nope, that was not chauvinism. Repugnant or not, it is true.
> Is this supposed to be a slur against people from countries in the > British Commonwealth? against speakers
> And have you ever considered the question of your inappropriate use of > the word "retard" is a noun rather than a verb? You mean as, not is. If you see the context and understand how parts of speech are identified in English, then you should know it's not inappropriate.
-Aut
Y.Porat - 03 Sep 2005 06:52 GMT Josi
that is a dialog of one person
you have to realizes thats going on here (i actually got it very quickly)
we are dealing here with two educational worlds!!
me and you and most western people are educated on: 'first honesty and only later 'i win or you win'
th world in which Auty was educated is :
first 'i win' and only at the third place - honesty!!
no matter the price 'i must win' even with the price of lying
go the little difference and this is in curable even at her young age she is .
bottom line she will never be a serious scientist(because intellectual integrity is the first condition for that or else you want to become a good lawyer (:-) or politician !!- thats the kind of a politician born type .
no matter if she gets marry ed or not ...(:-) and nothing is going to change that situation so second conclusion: any discussion with Auty is a wast of time
the most she can do is bringing some quotes as she was useful for me for proving me right(unwillingly !!) on the Gold platinum issue
yet nothing but parroting
ATB Y.Porat ------------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 03 Sep 2005 11:56 GMT Everyone knows that Porat is a pathological liar who can't back up anything he claims about people or the world. He twists being disproven and nonproven into being proven because he's a shameless shithead. You'll never catch me lyging, but I regularly catch others, who can't talk themselves out.
Y.Porat - 03 Sep 2005 14:40 GMT anyone who will follow this thread will realize who is a lier you can see it in another thread:
'Nuclear binding energies' in the Gold Platinum issue that verified unprecedentedly my prediction that Gold cannot be transformed to Platinum by any human deed as it is now .
now what is interesting me now is the following question:
is that psycho alone
or may be there is some organization behind that 'holy virgin'??
TIA Y.Porat -----------------------------
josiemargolis@aol.com - 04 Sep 2005 23:15 GMT >> Autymn D. C. wrote: >> <snipped> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> -Aut Here are some other rude Autymn DC posts showing her xenophobia...
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Autymn D. C. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >> sustem base-twelve, using our units, we would be on the ball. I'll fix >> that in due time...
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Autymn D. C. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >>/haven't/ a clue, and crap is a NOUN, not an adjective, which is >>/crappy/.
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Autymn D. C. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> Rambling foreigners get ignored fast. >> <snipped>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Autymn D. C. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >> >> -Aut Autymn D. C. - 05 Sep 2005 03:39 GMT I'm not afraid of strangers, fool.
john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com - 08 Sep 2005 09:45 GMT > Here are some other rude Autymn DC posts showing her xenophobia... > > >> Here's a message to all illiterate Commonwealthlings out there: > >> It's /haven't/ a clue, and crap is a NOUN, not an adjective, > >> which is /crappy/. Seeing Autymn/Deborah's spelling of "arse", I assumed she must be a Commonwealthling herself.
Richard Herring - 08 Sep 2005 11:19 GMT >> Here are some other rude Autymn DC posts showing her xenophobia... >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Seeing Autymn/Deborah's spelling of "arse", I assumed she must be >a Commonwealthling herself. No, that's just her spelling disorder. Her misuse of the transitive verb "retard" as an epithet suggests a North American origin.
 Signature Richard Herring
Y.Porat - 08 Sep 2005 15:51 GMT Hi Richard how about some physics ?
it is a physics ng remember
dont let that disturbed creature to take us all out of the track!!
ATB Y.Porat --------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 10 Sep 2005 01:02 GMT > >> Here are some other rude Autymn DC posts showing her xenophobia... > >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > No, that's just her spelling disorder. Her misuse of the transitive verb > "retard" as an epithet suggests a North American origin. I have no disorders, fool. (fool = verb, noun)
-Aut
josiemargolis@aol.com - 01 Sep 2005 17:20 GMT I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She thinks that she's highly intelligent just because she had early experiences winning spelling bees. She can throw around scientific jargon glibly, but many of her posts are communication failures in the sense that other people often can't understand what she's saying. She considers this communication failure to be the fault of the reader, but of course the fault is in the writing, which tends to include incomplete sentences, question fagments such as "Why?" or "How?" in an ambiguous context, pronouns with unclear references, and not giving enough background information to let other people know what she's talking about.
When she's angry she tosses about unimaginative name-calling like a twelve years old, but I think she's probably in her twenties, merely too unskilled to come up with anything better to say.
She has a serious misunderstanding of the scientific method, the academic process, and the general human endeavor to seek the truth. She sees the world in a distorted black and white "I'm right -- You're a retard" that just doesn't fit the evidence. Even Wikipedia won't put up with her atrocious behavior and lack of respect for opinions that differ from her own.
She has no qualms about expressing her vulgar personal prejudices against Jews, homosexuals, people from other countries, and people from other parts of her own country. Unfortunately she's also an outspoken atheist who gives a bad name to all of the decent atheists out there. She makes me ashamed to be a female American.
No doubt her reply will be that she hates us and wants us to "stop making things up". But there isn't any need to "make things up" since she condemns herself with her own posts.
Hee spelling corrections are merely annoying. Apparently she doesn't believe in using "ph", an eccentricity that might be charming in less obnoxious person.
> Carlos wrote : > [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > > - josiemargolis@aol.com - 05 Sep 2005 23:27 GMT I want to withdraw my comment about Autymn posting negative remarks about Jews. I jumped to this conclusion based on a web post that quoted and replied to Autymn, but I now believe that this particular post was misleading in that it handled the forwarding notation such that some paragraphs looked as if they were written by Autymn when in fact the writing style and opinions expressed are not consistent with her other posts (and therefore probably not attributable to her).
I apologize for my mistake on this specific item. The rest of my post still seems correct to me.
> I think you're right about Stockton California, but wrong about her > gender. Her name is Autymn Deborah Castleton. She thinks that she's [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] > > > > - donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 06 Sep 2005 01:53 GMT Actually, according to cybernetics, one must ignore the substrate of a metasystem when assessing its worth. An example - all of us think and reason giving no attention to the substrate, 100,000,000,000 neurons. Thus whatever Auty posts stands on it's own according to the Turing test regardless of any characteristics of the author. Thus the whole basis of this thread is invalid. Too bad the entire usergroup is nothing but name-calling by a few who have nothing better to do.
Autymn D. C. - 06 Sep 2005 09:30 GMT Josie Margolis - 06 Sep 2005 21:08 GMT > Actually, according to cybernetics, one must ignore the substrate of a > metasystem when assessing its worth. An example - all of us think and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > basis of this thread is invalid. Too bad the entire usergroup is > nothing but name-calling by a few who have nothing better to do. You make an interesting point here. I'll try to refrain from doing any more posts on this subject.
Y.Porat - 07 Sep 2005 06:09 GMT quote:
The rest of my post still seems correct to me. end of quote
Josi please dont forget the this REST OF YOUR POST IS THE MAIN PROBLEM HERE !!
IE that crook Autymn( that i am not sure it is at all a woman) is a pain in the neck
IE a walking damage that is disturbing any apposite physics discussion!! it is a sent gangster by some gang. for instance while i started a thread about energy crisis and what can QM contribute to solve it this crock completely obfuscated it by its crooked spelling business. so other people completely forgot what is the main issue
and that is exactly what that disturbed gangster and its gang wanted do do !!
do you get it?
Y.Porat --------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 07 Sep 2005 10:25 GMT I answered your QM question on-topic, deluded liar.
Y.Porat - 08 Sep 2005 04:29 GMT you answered nothing because you are unable to answer anything you are nothing but a little crook and anyone will realize it very soon
you can cheat a person forever you can cheat all - just once but you cant cheat everybody forever
Y.Porat ------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 08 Sep 2005 08:45 GMT Porat is a schizoid liar who can't give credit where it's due or shut up when he's wrong.
Y.Porat - 08 Sep 2005 15:56 GMT Little crook you supported Platinum Creation from Gold!!
(by Laser)!!
shows what is your real worth as a physicist so dont talk about admitting mistakes??
Autymn D. C. - 10 Sep 2005 01:03 GMT I supported rejecting your proofless lyging.
Y.Porat - 10 Sep 2005 10:54 GMT no one believes until now that Gold can be turned to Platinum by laser
it is not energetic enough to do such a transformation
if people claim they did it and you just parrot them means that you are a parrot.
th probability of producing it as 1 to 10 billion is good enough as null
if you dont get it others get it not to mention that the source sheet of Gold had more than 1 to 10 billion impurities no need to be too cleaver and minimal knowledgeable about those things to realize it. so the burden of prove is on the claimers of that experiment! no need to believe them blindly on such an important and principal issue
Y.P -------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 11 Sep 2005 05:11 GMT cleaver -> clever prove -> proof
How energetic is your "big bang" event, that is ever more a fiction than the petawatt laser?
Nick - 11 Sep 2005 05:25 GMT It was an energy buildup. A universal one.
Y.Porat - 11 Sep 2005 10:14 GMT do you realize how auty is (i try to be gentle)
missing knowledge??
th big band is alleged to be the most energetic even of this universe history
IE it crushed anything and any matter of was to the smallest sub particles and only later while cooling all our matter was created step by stem more heavy as it became more cooler
laser is not even 'the flee on the cat's tail' compared to that. laser of today as far as i know can make only minor changes of *light nuclei* and much less on the heavy ones. one day i am going to show in my site the structure of the say Gold Platinum mercury nuclei and you will understand what is the nuclear skeleton of the nuclei and what is the 'dressing' all around it laser of today can tough only the 'dressing' the 'clothes' of the nuc. not its 'bones' at the meantime you can ask Michael Moroney about that difference he got a copy of copy of my book. and may be you can have some idea about it in general in my site: you can see there the alpha particles building the 'rectangular pipe' that is the skeleton and on that skeleton smaller sub particles like protons Neutrons Deuteron's etc are connected peripherally.and they are the 'dressing of that skeleton the differ enc Between Gold and Platinum is in the skeleton!! it is not 'a different animal' but there is some noticeable difference
http://www.geocities.com/porat_y/mypage.html ---------
ATB Y.Porat -----------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 11 Sep 2005 10:28 GMT flee -> flea i -> I
I don't entertain frauds.
Y.Porat - 11 Sep 2005 11:36 GMT Hi psycho
Y.Porat - 14 Sep 2005 09:02 GMT i just wonder:
what is the date in which 'Auty' first entered this NG??
TIA Y.Porat ------------------------------------
NunYa Bidness - 14 Sep 2005 15:34 GMT >what is the date in which 'Auty' first entered >this NG?? "Auty" Murphy, medal of dishonor winner.
Y.Porat - 15 Sep 2005 06:48 GMT as far as my Goggle search this creature came here just a few months ago !!!!!!!!
btw it is much worse than dishonor it is mental decease!!
ATB Y.Porat --------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 15 Sep 2005 15:07 GMT There's no such thing as a Goggle search, retard. If I had a mental decease, I couldn't be posting here, illiterate retard.
Y.Porat - 15 Sep 2005 15:52 GMT OK not a mantel decease but deep mental disturbance
now you didn't answer a question that a normal person would answer:
what is the first date in which you cam into this news group??
TIA Y.Porat ------------------------
Y.Porat - 16 Sep 2005 05:57 GMT and the answer is .....????
TIA Y.Porat -------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 16 Sep 2005 08:20 GMT Disturbances are neutral, neither good nor bad. Why ask such a dumb question? Why don't you look it up?
Y.Porat - 16 Sep 2005 09:15 GMT why are you evading such a simple question??
is it not disturbance
i want an authorized answer IE just from the 'horse mouth'
2 what is your formal education
i want to know how can i rely on your physics judgments.
3 evasion maneuvering will be an answer as well ..........!!
4 it seems that these questions might interest other readers except me.
TIA Y.Porat ----------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 17 Sep 2005 13:50 GMT 1. I evade easy questions. 2. Such education has nothing to do with these judgements. Many degreed and doctors are fools. 3. You evade every time someone asks you to prove your claims against the establishment. Your denial of the relativistic [correct] predictions of length contraction in the heavy atoms, in the thread about why mercury is a liquid, was pathetic, and your children should be ashamed that they have a mentally disturbed and deluded fool in their care. 4. Who's reading? except -> besides
-Aut
Y.Porat - 18 Sep 2005 07:01 GMT > 1. I evade easy questions. no that is not the reason you evade the question of how long are you in this ng because every one will understand that your arrogant mad behavior cannot by anyway fit a creature that is attending here just a few months!!
only if you are disturbed completely you are in this ng for many years but with another name which sows that you are a crook even your posing as a woman is a ridiculous lie of a disturbed crook!! only at the goo Case for you you are just a gangster sent by gangsters btw Michael Varney is a good enough name for you --
> 2. Such education has nothing to do with these judgements. Many > degreed and doctors are fools. surprisingly enough i agree with you only on that point (:-)
> 3. You evade every time someone asks you to prove your claims against > the establishment. first i show the absurd and contradiction second you cant understand my claims without having my full model.
Your denial of the relativistic [correct]
> predictions of length contraction in the heavy atoms, where have you found me deny it ?? (may be in the few mounts that you are on this ng??(:-) dont you realize that you are dealing with an intelligent person that can reveal contradictions in your behavior? a person who revealed some important secrets of the nucleus cannot dis mask a human crook?? -----------
in the thread
> about why mercury is a liquid, was pathetic, -------- what is that thread of yours it was many years before you appeared here in this ng!!!!!..
dont you get that you reveal the mask of your real face?? 2 i explained why mercury is liquid one must have my Mercury Atoms scheme in order to understand it!! without it you cant understand it
2 btw thank you for helping me to verify my unprecedented prediction that Gold cannot turn into Platinum!! and the second prediction of Mercury to Gold is on the way!! can you even come close to such predictions ?? crook ----------------
and your children should
> be ashamed that they have a mentally disturbed and deluded fool in > their care. who is retarded and worse than that- a psycho anybody can see
dont forget your pills. and dont forget to answer in detaile not just by one line. as an alleged scientist.
Y.Porat -------------------
Autymn D. C. - 18 Sep 2005 10:19 GMT > you evade the question of how long are you in this ng > because every one will understand that your arrogant mad behavior > cannot by anyway fit a creature that is attending here just a few > months!! non sequitur
> only if you are disturbed completely > you are in this ng for many years but with another name > which sows that you are a crook I'm not. You couldn't even tell what country I was in.
> even your posing as a woman is a ridiculous lie of a disturbed crook!! you
> only at the goo Case for you > you are just a gangster sent by gangsters > btw Michael Varney is a good enough name for you paranoid delusions
> surprisingly enough i agree with you only on that point (:-) i -> I You might be one of them.
> first i show the absurd and contradiction i -> I No, you don't.
> second > you cant understand my claims without having my full model. cant -> can't with unseen structures?
> where have you found me deny it ?? > (may be in the few mounts that you are on this ng??(:-) I already told you. Stop reading behind and replying like a retard.
> dont you realize that you are dealing with an intelligent person dont -> don't
> that can reveal contradictions in your behavior? I deal with myself.
> a person who revealed some important secrets of the nucleus > cannot dis mask a human crook?? cannot what?
> what is that thread of yours > it was many years before you appeared here in this ng!!!!!.. Use Google Groups search, fool. It wasn't "my" thread.
> dont you get that you reveal the mask of your real face?? dont -> don't wrong
> 2 i explained why mercury is liquid i -> I
> one must have my Mercury Atoms scheme in order to understand it!! > without it you cant understand it cant -> can't How about the numbers?
> 2 btw thank you for helping me to verify my unprecedented prediction > that Gold cannot turn into Platinum!! wrong
> and the second prediction of Mercury to Gold > is on the way!! > can you even come close to such predictions ?? crook Where are your numbers, liar?
> dont forget your pills. dont -> don't
> and dont forget to answer in detaile dont -> don't detaile -> detail
> not just by one line. as an alleged scientist. You're only worth one line.
Y.Porat - 18 Sep 2005 10:59 GMT Hi imbecile disturbed crook people already realize whom you are a scum disturbed Nazi you are not worth exchanging a single sentence with anybody just a peace of human sh.t.
Y.P ----------------
Autymn D. C. - 18 Sep 2005 15:49 GMT Yes you are.
Y.Porat - 19 Sep 2005 08:03 GMT Auty is certainly not a woman no woman would ever behave that way
and that the first sign of a human sh.t phenomena
so if anyone can add some more information about that creature welcome for instance that creature refuses to tell what is its formal education i never before met such behavior-- clear sing of a dishonest crook and tells everybody how to relate to its scientific judgment so what is and who is behind that human peace of sh.t?? that is wasting the precious time of this ng.
Y.Porat ---------------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 21 Sep 2005 09:27 GMT I reflect the other writer's personality and amplify their flaws. Anyone learnt and caring will notice your delusions and roast you for them. So you are what you've groundlessly accused, shithead.
Y.Porat - 21 Sep 2005 15:14 GMT shitty Auty what is your formal education why do you refuse to tell it i never before met a case like that of someone who refuses to tell that.
just tell the people about how seriously they can take you as a science physics judge.
Y.P -------------------------
Autymn D. C. - 22 Sep 2005 11:48 GMT There is no such person here, schizo.
donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 22 Sep 2005 12:00 GMT Do you two realize how incredibly boring you two are outside the Porat-Autymn system??????
Y.Porat - 22 Sep 2005 12:07 GMT OK i agree with you so the solution is a cease fire IE i ignore her (him) and he ignores me if you arrange it you get the Nobel prize for peace ..........
ATB Y.Porat ------------------------------
brian a m stuckless - 22 Sep 2005 13:02 GMT $ Y (You can call me DR-like!) Porat Within the PARTiCLE PHYSiCs sausage of LiFE; Y Porat is MOST OUTSTANDiNGLY, the FiLLER.!! SOMEone please ask him what is his learning. Perhaps, Y (You can call me DR-like!) Porat. He so DESPERATELY! wants SOMEone to ASK him. DR-like Y [CRACKED-pot (GR crackpot)] Porat. GET the GUTs to say, "i AM, DR-like Y Porat. Sincerely c, ```Brian
>><> >><> >><> >><> >><> onstockbauer@hotmail.com wrote:
> Do you two realize how incredibly boring you two are > outside the Porat-Autymn system?????? brian a m stuckless - 22 Sep 2005 13:02 GMT > Do you two realize how incredibly boring you two are outside the > Porat-Autymn system?????? $ Y (You can call me DR-like!) Porat Within the PARTiCLE PHYSiCs sausage of LiFE; Y Porat is MOST OUTSTANDiNGLY, the FiLLER.!! SOMEone please ask him what is his learning. Perhaps, Y (You can call me DR-like!) Porat. He so DESPERATELY! wants SOMEone to ASK him. DR-like Y [CRACKED-pot (GR crackpot)] Porat. GET the GUTs to say, "i AM, DR-like Y Porat. Sincerely c, ```Brian
>><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Y.Porat - 23 Sep 2005 07:08 GMT sorry i understood nothing of what you said can you say it in one simple sentence?? and btw the issue here is Auty not Porat ---------------------- TIA Y.Porat -------------------------
Y.Porat - 19 Sep 2005 15:12 GMT you are not even original shitty
Y.P ------------------------------
|
|
|