Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Do Virtual Photons Exist?"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tas - 17 Sep 2005 15:23 GMT
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?"

    The Aether was original conceived as a means of explaining
"forces acting at a distance" (i.e.- electric, magnetic, gravitation, et
al).
When the idea of the classical Aether was abandoned early in the century,
there
was a need to find another means of explaining these forces because, if it
were
not possible to explain them by some other means then it would be necessary
to
retain the Aether and the absolute reference frame it represented. The
elimination of that reference frame was an absolute imperative of the
political
agenda of the academic community. Fortunately, the advent of quantum theory
allowed Dr. Feynmann to generate the idea that these forces were produced by
the
exchange of "virtual particles". These particles were so named because they
popped into and out of existence for periods of time that were so short that
the
rules of quantum physics insured that their temporary existence did not
violate
the Law of Conservation of Energy.

    It is easy to understand how these particles could provide a
force over a distance. A "virtual particle" emitted from one point would
absorb
momentum and travel ballistically to another where it would release that
momentum. The net result would be force acting between the points. The
situation
is analogous to the effect observed when two athletes throw a medicine ball
back
and forth to each other. Difficulty with the analogy is that the throwing of
the
medicine ball can only produce a repulsive force; it cannot produce an
attractive force! The mathematics associated with the force production by
"virtual particles" particles, however, does allow for the production of
attractive forces, but, since no explanation as to how this is possible is
provided, one is left with the suspicion that this is another example of a
solution where an effect that is allowed by the mathematics involved is
being
used outside of the constraints imposed by the physical realities of the
problem. These realities require a rather unusual exchange of momentum to be
involved. In order to produce the attractive force, the "virtual photon"
would
have to be launched with a momentum represented by a propagation direction
away
from its target, reverse its momentum (direction of travel), go past its
target
and repeat the process so as to acquire a momentum in the required direction
as
it struck the target from behind. (If anyone can provide a different
explanation
I would like to hear it.) Of course, if the "virtual photon" were
propagating
through a medium, such as the Aether, there would be no conceptual problem,
the
"virtual particle could make the necessary exchange of momentum with the
medium.
(A boomerang returns to the thrower because it exchanges momentum with a
medium,
air. But then, if the Aether were present we would have no need to consider
the
existence of "virtual photons".

    There is no need to resort to theoretical arguments, however.
If virtual photons produce electric and magnetic forces, they should be
observable. Consider a large electromagnet, such as is used in an MIR
machine. A
recent news report described an unfortunate incident where a steel oxygen
bottle
was not properly mounted to its wall bracket. The magnetic field of the MIR
pulled the bottle to the machine and killed a boy who was being scanned. It
is
obvious that the room was filled with a large and extremely powerful
magnetic
field. If "virtual photons" were present in that room, they would have
produced
a level of electromagnetic interference that would scream their presence. If
electric and magnetic forces were produced by "virtual photons", they would
have
to also effect any electromagnetic detectors in their vicinity and one would
expect that both natural and man-made electric and magnetic fields would
render
electromagnetic communication impossible.

    An experiment is described in Chapter 4 of "The Einstein Hoax"
in which a strong electric field is produced inside of an evacuated chamber
and
an antenna is located between the electrodes. Using a radiation detector
that
covers the entire spectrum would allow the detection of any spurious photons
that acted to produce the attractive force. Its a simple experiment and is
one
which should be performed it science is to accept "virtual photons" as
meaningful.

    The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax/hoax.htm ("The Einstein Hoax" {1997});
http://einsteinhoax/gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http://einsteinhoax/relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity" {1997}).
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE
WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND
IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not
monitored on a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the
same
courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of
our
parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material that
you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for
over 5 years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF
THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals
who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without questioning it.
If
anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be objectively answered,
the
material at the Website will be withdrawn. Challenges to date have revealed
only
the responder's inadequacy with one exception for which a correction was
provided.
Y.Porat - 22 Sep 2005 05:27 GMT
Virtual photons are     (surprise) - virtual science!
the same as Aether

Y.Porat
--------------------------------
Tony Lance - 01 Nov 2006 17:25 GMT
Big Bertha Thing progress
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/progress.html
Access page to 6K Web page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.transport

The Progress of Discontent

by T. Warton
(Written at Oxford in 1746)

From the book
Half-hours With the Best Authors
The "Chandos Classics"
Edited by Charles Knight
Published by Frederick Warne and Co. 1890

Big Bertha Thing besides

Some people think that Big Bertha is less suitable for the
OUSA Astronomy Conf., than for OUSA Classical Particle Conf.
Have they heard the long name for CP Conf?

High Energy Particle Physics Rock Hard Science With a Fringe
Perspective.

They think that is a better place to put Big Bertha.
They must be besides themselves, which proves the thing.

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
To comply with my copyright,
please distribute complete and free of charge.

Tony Lance
tonylance@bigberthathing.co.uk

Big Bertha Thing Probe-B

In the Sunday Telegraph of 11th April 2004, the QED section, gave the story of
the Gravity Probe-B satellite launch. This is expected to prove the existence of
a new force of nature, proposed by Einstein.

Free Press Pack Download (11MB PDF)
http://www.gravityprobeb.com/gpb_presskit.pdf

There are one or two problems with this:-
1. Einstein never proposed this new force of nature. (Funding canard)
2. It is a magnetic force directly proportional to angular momentum. (Memomagnetism)
3. It is weak at Newtonian speeds and strong at near light speeds.
4. The big three in gyroscopes are Einstein, Professor Francis Everitt of
     Stanford University and Harold Crabtree M.A.
5. One wrote the definitive book on the subject and the other two read it.
6. The relevant extract from the book is given below. (Spider published 4th March 1998)
7. They do not credit the costermonger, with the definitive experiment,
     which proves the existence of the new force of nature.
8. They do not accept that the novelty item was a valid experiment.
9. They believe that the spider wheel was magnetized.
10. The costermonger did not magnetize the spider wheel, he exploited a force of nature.
11. The costermonger discovered, applied and sold the first working application.
12. There is an eye-witness account from 1850 by the author, which kindled his
     life-long interest.
13. The description was published in 1909, in the same book.
14. The force of nature has been missing for 150 years, since its discovery.
15. The first modern publication on the subject is spider, on 4th March 1998. (Usenet)
16. Attribution and due credit are two of the failings of modern science.

Big Bertha Thing spider  
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://web.onetel.com/~tonylance/spider.html
Access page JPG 11K Image
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including uk.rec.cycling

Drawing of a clockwork spider wheel and hairpin.

Extract from Introductory Chapter;-
The "Spider tops," which are frequently sold in the streets of London,
consist of a heavy little disc mounted on a spindle (Fig. XIV.).
When the disc has been set spinning a small curved piece of
metal is placed to touch the toe, and at once begins to slide round it,
first the side (a) in the figure, and then the side (b),
the motion continuing backwards and forwards till the top comes to rest.
The fact is that the toe is magnetic, and this being the case it is easy
to see that the rolling of the toe on the side of the metal produces
the motion.

From the book
An Elementary Treatment of the Theory of
Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion.
By Harold Crabtree M.A.
Formerly Scholar of Pembroke College, Cambridge
Assistant Master at Charterhouse
Longmans, Green and Co. 1923
First Edition 1909
Second Edition 1914
New Impression 1923
(C) Copyright Tony Lance 1998
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.

Big Bertha Thing fact

Anything but a fact, changes the face of twentieth century science.
1. No iron moons and planetary cores.
2. No red shift measure of speed.
3. No Patrick Moore star at 95% the speed of light.
4. Muons arrive on earth.
5. Relativity is like an imaginary number; useful but not real.
6. Einstein-Haas gives a field strength 1/10000th the electric field.
7. Wave particle duality is a field effect.
8. Schroedinger is an approximation.

Who has the wit to check the fact?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.