SORRY Bilge ..about last POST.!! Bilge wrote:..
> The the entire point of the experiment is discover whether
> or not the `m' in Force = ma is the same `m' in Gm/r^2. --
You CONFUSE because "Gm/r^2" is NOT a FORCE, Bilge.!!
FOOT-in-MOUTH is the MOST GRUEsome afFLiCTion.. .. .. .. ..
..(RED-FACED) CLEANing up: Let notation for F = m2*a_2 ;
THEN: G-FORCE F = m1*g1
= m1*v1^2 / r1
= G*M1*m1 / r1^2
= 4*(pi)^2*m1*r1 / t1^2
= 4*(pi)^2*m2*(ORBiT radius) / (PERiOD sec)^2
= m2*(DiSTANCE) / (TiME ...second)^2
= m2*a_2.
CONCLUSiON:
An *EMBARASSiNG* example of "PEGGiNG" a "mis-nomer".!!
HANGin' up m'HOLSTER ( ..on that SleeveeEEN BilGE ).!!
VERY Sincerely c,
```Brian
p.s.
Note ANGULAR momentum pA = mass*radius*velocity:
But THERE's NO QUANTiTY for a CENTRAL MASS here.!!
Again, i am still red-faced about that misnomer.!!
That SLOPPY confsed Bilge makes me so irritated.!!
>><> >><> >><> >><> >><>
> -- A non-null
> result (which is what uncleal would like to get) means those
> two `m's are not the same. It shouldn't be much of a surprise
> that one can take advantage of the difference.
vanep@cox.net - 22 Sep 2005 20:58 GMT
You should be red faced you're an embarrassment to the human race.