> "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
Occasionally this nonsense is worth responding to.
> When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High
> Energy experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> observable mass equivalent energies of hundreds of GEV. Where did the energy
> they represent come from?
It is mistaken to assume that energy must reside *inside objects*.
> A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles,
> their rest mass indicates that their total energy was about 2 GEV.
Well, this isn't their total energy either individually or
collectively. Nor is their rest mass as a colliding pair equal to 2
GeV. Rest mass is not calculated as the sum of matter or the sum of the
rest masses of the objects in the system.
> B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the
> collision products is the kinetic energy of the impacting protons. The
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> did
> not come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic energy go?
The kinetic energy is the source, but note that the kinetic energy of
the system does not reside *inside* the protons.
> C:- Experiment indicates that electrons, and the quarks that
> make up protons and neutrons have no solid structure down to the observation
> limit of 10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have. The more rest mass
> energy a
> particle has, the smaller it is.
This is not obvious at all. A neutrino is not smaller than an electron,
nor vice versa, as far as we know.
> If quarks contained smaller particles, the
> rest
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Rather than accept the fact that these particles contain no
> structure, theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory
This is not the reason for superstring theory.
> that asserts
> that
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> the
> quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged.
Well, one might ask reflectively why the reverse (a smooth space) is a
more desirable foundation.
> Once the error is admitted
> and
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> man
> since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.
The truth is also understandable by the average man, if one is willing
to examine some preconceived notions.
> The disturbing part of the present process is that the next
> generation of scientists is having their minds destroyed by being
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> the responder's inadequacy with one exception for which a correction was
> provided.