 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / November 2005CANCELL *ALL* Ph.Tivity degrees.!! GR PREDiCTs that "TWO (2) GR-WORLD-TEST-mass WiLL NOT ATTRACT".!! GTR predicts ONLY that TWO GR-TEST-mass will NOT attract. [ This GTR (GR) PREDiCTiON has NEVER been MEASURED yet ]. [ Because GR CONTRADiCTORY observations don't GET MADE ]. GR-TEST-mass is mass ..or WOULD be if it COULD HAVE mass in GR.!!
$ CANCELL *ALL* Ph.Tivity degrees.!! Tom Roberts wrote: > > Joe Fischer wrote: > Hmmm. That basically comes from writing down the Lagrangians for all > known forces and examining their coupling constants. The one for Gravity > is smaller than the others by an enormous factor. For instance, between > two electrons at a given distance the ratio of gravitational force to > electrostatic force is about 10^-42 -- that is INCREDIBLY TINY. Even "MiCRO", in YAB-a-dab-a-doo "infinitesimal piece of spacetime".!! i.e. The MORE "incredibly tiny" a Blackhole, the MORE "micro" it is.!! > Need I point out that this is in the Newtonian gravitation > approximation to GR, -=- You SURELY have your a.s ..backwards, before the cart there, Dimwit.!! > -=- so "gravitational force" does indeed make sense? > > > What would any of the intermoleular or even intraatomic > > forces be at the distance of one astronomical unit? > > Who cares? If you want to compare the strengths of forces, you should > compare them at the same distance. And you should use normal charges > appropriate for the forces involved. $ ABSORBED photon mass MEASURED.!! PHOTON mass, h*fL / c^2 = {mph} = 2*pi*h / tp*c^2 = hbar / ls*c.!! Go-go Google GROUP SEARCH < My BiGGER bang > ..a FiNE STRUCTURE.!! > It seems you are so accustomed to the electrical neutrality of ordinary > objects that you just don't fathom how strong EM forces really are -- > they are ENORMOUS compared to gravity. Why do you think scrap iron > weighing many tons is easily lifted by an electromagnet (that is MUCH > smaller than either the earth or the iron)? And electrostatic forces > between charged objects can be MUCH larger than that.... > > > It even seems that use of the word "force" to describe > > all aspects of gravity fails to convey the correct meaning to the > > various processes. > > Yes. -=- $ GR PREDiCTs that "TWO (2) GR-WORLD-TEST-mass WiLL NOT ATTRACT".!! $ Shortage of GR-CONTRADiCTiON observation: QM predicts ONLY probabilities ..AFTER many observations. SR predicts ONLY iNTRiNSiC e = RESTmass*c^2; m = e / c^2. $ GTR predicts ONLY that TWO GR-TEST-mass will NOT attract. [ This GTR (GR) PREDiCTiON has NEVER been MEASURED yet ]. [ Because GR CONTRADiCTORY observations don't GET MADE ]. $ GR-TEST-mass is mass ..or WOULD be if it COULD HAVE mass in GR.!! > -=- But the ratio of coupling constants in the Lagrangian -=- Duh... $ NEW SI GUESS iSS CODATA LaGrangian L: L = h*fL = nL*h*c / wl = nA*{mph}*ls*c^2 / rA = m1*c^2 = [mph]*c^2 = E - eM - eV = eK - eV = eM - eF = [(m1*v1^2 / 2)*(m1/M1 + 1)] .!! You'll NEED, essentially, iN THEORY, a *well-defined* LaGrangian.!! (Question: Why'd dimwits ALL stick to lunatic-Tivity LaGrangians.?) LiGHT velocity c is NOW a MATHEMATiCAL constant ..just as is, pi.!! LiGHT velocity v VARiEs, inversely, WiTH the path-PARTiCLE-COUNT.!! $ There is NO GR way down. brian a m stuckless >><> >><> >><> >><> >><> > -=- is a useful comparison. > > Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct. > $ CANCELL *ALL* Ph.Tivity degrees.!! > Tom Roberts wrote: > > Joe Fischer wrote: [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature > and that the results given by the math are essentially correct. Ahh I see, so your next statement is that we're all "clock worshippers". f.ck off spaceman. Brian! You need to watch what you post! You could lose your credibility! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.