Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / December 2005

"The Flaw in High Energy Physics"

    When it comes to particle physics a question arises. High
Energy experiments have led to a plethora of short-lived high-energy
products.
As an example, a proton and an anti-proton, each having a mass equivalent
energy
of 1 GEV are accelerated to a velocity so close to that of light so that
they
each contain kinetic energy of hundreds of GEV. These particles are then
induced
to collide and, in so doing, produce short lived high-energy products having
observable mass equivalent energies of hundreds of GEV. Where did the energy
they represent come from?

    A:- The energy certainly wasn't in the original particles,
their rest mass indicates that their total energy was about 2 GEV.

    B:- The only source of the excess energy represented by the
collision products is the kinetic energy of the impacting protons. The
observed
total energy after the collision never seems to be reported as exceeding the
input energy. If the excess energy was hidden in the original protons and
did
not come from their kinetic energy, then where did the kinetic energy go?

    C:- Experiment indicates that electrons, and the quarks that
make up protons and neutrons have no solid structure down to the observation
limit of 10^-18 meters, as indeed they cannot have. The more rest mass
energy a
particle has, the smaller it is. If quarks contained smaller particles, the
rest
mass of those smaller particles would be greater than the rest mass of the
quark
and the proton or neutron would be more massive than it is. On the other
hand,
if particles making up the quark were less massive than the quark they would
also be larger and would not fit within the nucleon.

    Rather than accept the fact that these particles contain no
structure, theoreticians have resorted to Superstring Theory that asserts
that
reality consists of curled higher order dimensions having a radius 20 orders
of
magnitude smaller than the nucleon (a nice choice of scale since their
observation is not likely to ever be possible). At this scale level, the
combination of Quantum Theory and General Relativity is asserted to cause
space
to be a frothy foam. Unfortunately physicists would rather accept such a
concept
than accept the idea that there is an error in General Relativity, after all
the
quasi-religious "Faith" must not be challenged. Once the error is admitted
and
the necessary corrections made, the merging of the two theories becomes
obvious.
The need for the activity at 10^-34 meters vanishes and space becomes
smooth.

    Everything really does become much simpler when one follows
the rules of evidence in Science as well it is done in other activities and
recognize that it is necessary to consider the effects of possible changes
in
the size of the units of measurement used by instruments produced by a
change in
reference frame in addition to the results of those measurements. When one
takes
this step an entirely different view of reality results. This view of
reality is
much more straightforward and is capable of being understood by the average
man
since the operation of its mechanisms are clear.

    The disturbing part of the present process is that the next
generation of scientists is having their minds destroyed by being
indoctrinated
into the "True Faith".

    The source material for this posting may be found in http:///hoax.htm
("The Einstein Hoax" {1997}); http:///gravity.htm; ("Gravity" {1987}); and
http:///relcor.htm ("Corrections to Special Relativity" {1997}). EVERYTHING
WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE
ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST
BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http:///postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 5
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.