Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / February 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: The Metastases of Entropy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
brian a m stuckless - 23 Feb 2006 22:16 GMT
Pentcho Valev wrote: >
> By the end of 19th century J. Gibbs converted the first law of
> thermodynamics >
>                               dE = dQ - PdV             (1)

$$ GUESS iSS Universal REST mass eM = E - eK              (1)
$$                         =   + (    E        ) - eK     (1)
$$                         = L + (    E - L    ) - eK     (1)
$$                         = L + (SUM mu_i dn_i) - eK     (2)
$$                  = degK*[S] + (SUM mu_i dn_i) - eK     (2)
$$                         = L + (SUM mu_i dn_i) - eK     (2)
$$                         = L + eF ..eF is Helmholtz FREE energy;
$$         ..and EiTHER.. = eG - eV ..eV is Volt*Amp*sec ..energy;
$$         .. .. ..OR..   = eG + (m1*v1^2/2).

> into              dE = TdS  + [SUM mu_i dn_i] - PdV     (2)

$$  Gibbs tried to differentiate what was a redundant LaGrangian.
$$  The GUESS differentiates Gibbs'free energy eG into, eM + eV ;
$$   ..  ..OR (..in another calculation), into, eM - (m1*v1^2/2);
A NET energy caN'T iNCREASE & DECREASE, at once, per calculation.

Hope this helps,           ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).

> Gibbs did not notice that (2) was a physical absurdity - according
> to (2) mu_i, the chemical potential, turns out to be the increase
> in the internal energy of the system as one mole of the i-th
> component is added to the system, on condition that the volume and
> the entropy (!?!?) remain constant. Still in the interpretation of
> Gibbs (2) was a limited absurdity: Gibbs restricted the
> application of the equation to SYSTEMS IN INTERNAL EQUILIBRIUM for
> which, when such systems were closed, the entropy change dS was
> defined. Later someone else applied (2) to CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
> DISTANT FROM EQUILIBRIUM and the absurdity increased dramatically,
> to an extent allowing thermodynamics zombies to call (2) "The
> Fundamental Equation of Chemical Thermodynamics". (In the era of
> Postscientism equations containing undefined quantities like dS
> are fundamental by definition.) Finally, the postscientific
> juggler I. Prigogine simply combined (1) and (2) (eqs. 4.2 and
> 4.3' in I.Prigogine, "From Being to Becoming", Freeman and Co,
> 1980), obtained a new absurd expression for the entropy (eq. 4.13
in Prigogine's book) and was awarded the Nobel prize for his
> spoonerism. > > Pentcho Valev
Re: 'The Big Bang Never Happened' ..many I Prigogine references.
Re: The Metastases of Entropy.
brian a m stuckless - 24 Feb 2006 01:29 GMT
Typo-CORRECTED; < Gibbs Free energy eG >.   Pentcho Valev wrote: >
> By the end of 19th century J. Gibbs converted the first law of
> thermodynamics >              dE = dQ - PdV             (1)
$$ GUESS iSS Universal REST mass eM = E - eK              (1)
$$                         =   + (    E        ) - eK     (1)
$$                         = L + (    E - L    ) - eK     (1)
$$                         = L + (SUM mu_i dn_i) - eK     (2)
$$                  = degK*[S] + (SUM mu_i dn_i) - eK     (2)
$$                         = L + (     eG      ) - eK     (2)
$$                         = L + eF ..eF is Helmholtz FREE energy;
$$         ..and EiTHER.. = eG - eV ..eV is Volt*Amp*sec ..energy;
$$         .. .. ..OR..   = eG + (m1*v1^2/2), ..Newton iso-system.
$$         .. .. ..OR..   = eG + (m1*v1^2/2), ..and Zero-Point eM.

> into               dE = TdS  + [SUM mu_i dn_i] - PdV     (2)
$$  Gibbs differentiated, (SUM mu_i dn_i) = Gibbs Free energy eG.
$$  Gibbs CLEARLY differentiated his unique Gibbs Free energy eG.
$$  The GUESS differentiates Gibbs Free energy eG into, eM + eV ;
$$   ..  ..OR (..in another calculation), into, eM - (m1*v1^2/2);
A NET energy caN'T iNCREASE & DECREASE, at once, per calculation.
Go-go Google GROUPs search:
< Re: Photon Mass. > & < Re: Elementary CHARGE (+ OR -), {e}. >.

$$         SI icon, {e} jOULE & {e} Amp*sec, NUMBER duality.
Note, {e}*Volt electronvolt energy; {e} has SI units of, Amp*sec.
Note, {e}*Volt electronvolt energy eV; SAME NUMBER as {e}->A*sec.
Note, {e}*Volt = Hartree eH / 10*("e") = 1*electronvolt -> joule.
Note, {e} -> Amp*sec = eH/Vu = eH/10*("e")*Volt -> {e} -> charge.
Note, Vu is Voltage POTENTiAL, at UNiT distance fron UNiT charge.
Hope this helps,           ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).

> Gibbs did not notice that (2) was a physical absurdity - according
> to (2) mu_i, the chemical potential, turns out to be the increase
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> in Prigogine's book) and was awarded the Nobel prize for his
> spoonerism. > > Pentcho Valev
Re: 'The Big Bang Never Happened' ..many I Prigogine references.
Re: The Metastases of Entropy.
Typo-CORRECTED < Gibbs Free energy eG >.     End of edited rePOST.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.