Ambipolar Massfree Energy

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Gravityman - 27 Mar 2006 00:50 GMT

According to Dr. Correa, "ambipolar charges continuously alternate
between polar states, or, to say it more accurately, constantly vary
their polarity during forward propagation"

Does anyone know a way to test this? If such a particle can be
charged with ambipolar electricity, would it create magnetic field when

accelerated. If not, what effects can you predict would occur for such
a
hypothetical ambipolar characteristic?

For more info see the entire details about aetherometry at:

http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=Aetherometry_(by_Malgosia_Askanas)

Just the passage about ambipolar electricity:

"Electric massfree energy consists of ambipolar charges that are
devoid of inertial effects and propagate longitudinally. In contrast
to the monopolar charges (electrons, protons) that characterize
ordinary massbound electricity, ambipolar charges continuously
alternate between polar states, or, to say it more accurately,
constantly vary their polarity during forward propagation.
Ambipolar electricity is a massfree phenomenon."

I'm just exploring a possible Aether correlate of General Relativity.

Grav

Reply to this Message

Bilge - 27 Mar 2006 10:53 GMT

Gravityman:

>According to Dr. Correa, "ambipolar charges continuously alternate
>between polar states, or, to say it more accurately, constantly vary
>their polarity during forward propagation"
>
>Does anyone know a way to test this? If such a particle can be
>charged with ambipolar electricity, would it create magnetic field when

It violates conservation of charge, which has never been observed to
be violated.

>accelerated. If not, what effects can you predict would occur for such
>a
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Grav

Reply to this Message

Gravityman - 27 Mar 2006 11:21 GMT

> Gravityman:
> >According to Dr. Correa, "ambipolar charges continuously alternate
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It violates conservation of charge, which has never been observed to
> be violated.

But it is said to be devoid of inertial effect and mass-free so
it doesn't obey the normal rule of physics. It's mention that
"Electric massfree energy consists of ambipolar charges that are
devoid of inertial effects and propagate longitudinally. In contrast
to the monopolar charges (electrons, protons) that characterize
ordinary massbound electricity, ambipolar charges continuously
alternate between polar states, or, to say it more accurately,
constantly vary their polarity during forward propagation.
Ambipolar electricity is a massfree phenomenon."

Grav

> >accelerated. If not, what effects can you predict would occur for such
> >a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >Grav
> >

Reply to this Message

Gravityman - 27 Mar 2006 11:26 GMT

To continue with the above. Look at this wikipedia page:

http://www.driftline.org/wikipediafascism/Aetherometry.html

look at the bottom about "Primary Superimposition, Secondary
Superimposition, Tertiary processes of superimposition". It
is details about how particles were seemingly created from
superimposition of mass-free energy.

Grav

Reply to this Message

Bilge - 28 Mar 2006 07:52 GMT

Gravityman:

>> Gravityman:
>> >According to Dr. Correa, "ambipolar charges continuously alternate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>But it is said to be devoid of inertial effect and mass-free so
>it doesn't obey the normal rule of physics.

Witchcraft doesn't obey the ``normal rule'' of physics either.

>It's mention that
>"Electric massfree energy consists of ambipolar charges that are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>constantly vary their polarity during forward propagation.
>Ambipolar electricity is a massfree phenomenon."

You can either waste your time investigating non-sense that doesn't
even meet the criteria for being called scientific speculation, or
you can study the science which has been verified through experiments
until you reach the point that you can sort the science from the
garbage. It's your time, but at least in the latter case, you will
have at least gained an understanding of the science that is well
known and experimentally verified.

>Grav
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> >Grav
>> >

Reply to this Message

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Particle Physics / March 2006

Ambipolar Massfree Energy