> | > | > | > | > Ok... Reality and measurements:
-=-
> | > | > | > | > Earth clocks do not slow down,
> | > | > | > | > they stay in perfect agreement with sundials.
> | > | > | > |
> | > | > | > | Of course they do. The Earth clocks are in the
> | > | > | > | same reference frame as the sundials.
> | > | > | >
> | > | > | > And sundials slow down, do they? ahahaha.. HAHAHAHA..
> hahahaha...
-=-
> | > | Maybe. Have you asked them, or do you just *assume* they're
> | > | doing it without a periodic minor correction to account for
> | > | relative motion?
> | >
> | > I don't know how to periodically minor correct my sundial, -=-
> No, I'm not going to ask anyone with sense
> how to minor correct a sundial.
> It's your relativity, crackpot, you are the one
> saying moving clocks run slow,
> you tell me how to minor correct a sundial.
> You are the expert on moving clocks, *reality* and *measurement*,
> How come you can't tell me how to minor correct a simple sundial
> by 0.16 seconds a year? > | > Androcles.
> | > | PD
> | > | > "We establish by definition that the "time" required
> | > | > by light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it
> | > | > requires to travel from B to A." -- Albert Einstein.
> | > | > Maybe he couldn't figure out A is Earth and B is Cassini.
$$ Digital Vs Analog sundial.
$$ A SUN-dial is a *REAL* "TiME-clocker", not a *FREQUENCY COUNTER*.
$$ Where "ATOMiC-tics" are DiGiTAL ..a SUN-dial "clocker" is ANALOG.
tadchem - 27 Apr 2006 00:35 GMT
Google "analemma"
brian a m stuckless - 27 Apr 2006 10:25 GMT
$$ The analemma ("EQUATiON-of-TiME"):
$$ Set up a large magnifing glass on a standing pivot and burn
$$ an arc of SUN TiME in a piece of board ..flat on the ground.
$$ Do this the SAME PERiOD every sunny day through a full year.
$$ Save and date each piece of board and ..after the year ends,
$$ lay out all the pieces in a series, following the curvature.
$$ This will form a closed FiGURE-of-EiGHT ..an ANALOG "clock".
$$ [One loop of this figure-of-eight has much wider curvature].
$$ TiME is analog ..FREQUENCY is digital.
$$ The SHADOW knows.
$$ tadchem wrote: > > Google "analemma".
$$ The SHADOW knows the analemma ("Equation-of-Time").
$$ Go-go NETSCAPE News < alt.sci.nanotech > < bit.org >.
$$ A SUN-dial's a *REAL* "TiME-clocker", not a *FREQUENCY COUNTER*.
$$ Where "ATOMiC-tics" are DiGiTAL, a SUN-dial "clocker" is ANALOG.
Re: Digital Vs Analog sundial. ..END of POST.
Ben Rudiak-Gould - 27 Apr 2006 05:06 GMT
> $$ Where "ATOMiC-tics" are DiGiTAL ..a SUN-dial "clocker" is ANALOG.
$$ hTTp://WWW.digitalSUNDIAL.com/
-- Ben !!